English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50916730      Online Users : 829
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99146


    Title: 民意乎？黨意乎？－大陸新京報讀者投書的近用權實踐
    Other Titles: Whose Voice: Chinese People or the Chinese Communist Party?The Right of the Reader’s Access to Media in China through Op-Ed Page : A Case Study of Beijing News
    Authors: 張裕亮
    Chang, Yu-liang
    Keywords: 中國大陸傳媒;讀者投書;媒介近用權;輿論引導
    China media;op-ed contribution;the right of access to media;public opinion shaping
    Date: 2009-09
    Issue Date: 2016-07-19 16:26:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 九○年代以來，大陸都市報紛紛開闢讀者投書版，公開向社會大眾徵求就公共議題發表個人看法，也從而開啟了大陸媒介讀者投書的近用權實踐。本研究分析了在北京報業市場首創讀者投書版的新京報，發現投書論述主題背後反映的意義，在打造市民輿論平台，確有其一定成效，但卻明顯迴避了同時間台灣及國際傳媒關注的中國負面新聞。同時，在比對同時間新京報的社論論述主題，發現這些看似「民意」的讀者投書，在經過編輯室守門過程後，往往只是「黨意」的再現，亦即再現黨國當局「輿論引導」的框架。研究也發現，新京報讀者投書版主要是中高社會階層發聲的場域，並非任何民眾都可以參與討論的公共論壇。這說明了新京報讀者投書版距離作為哈伯馬斯所謂的公共論壇，必須具備議題開放、參與成員公平的要件，仍有相當差距。
    Since 1990s, many newspapers of major cities in China opened up op-ed pages, soliciting opinions over public issues from readers. This opened up readers’ access right to media in China. Taking a case study of Beijing News, a Beijing newspaper which initiated the op-ed page in Beijing, this paper aims at analyzing the significance of op-ed contents. Beijing News’s op-ed page as a platform did accomplish its functions in certain areas of public concerns. Nevertheless, the newspaper deliberately skipped those news negative to China’s image. Further, those op-ed pieces were likely to be edited before being published. What the above observations imply is that these op-eds only serve the Chinese Communist Party’s goal. This paper also projects that op-ed sections in China’s media have not achieved the level of what Jurgen Habermas calls “public forum,” that opens to all people to discuss all issues regardless of social class, race, gender, political faith, and religion.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 52(3), 1-38
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[中國大陸研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    52(3)p1-38.pdf2476KbAdobe PDF2214View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback