政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/99104
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113313/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50946032      Online Users : 853
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99104


    Title: 中國「派系政治」途徑分析：以「大躍進」起源為例
    Other Titles: An Analysis of the Factional Politics Approach in the CCP : the Origin of the Geat Leap Forward as an Example
    Authors: 蔡文軒
    Tsai, Wen-Shuen
    Keywords: 大躍進;多元主義;派系政治;研究綱領;保護帶;硬核;極權主義;實踐意識形態
    factional politics;great leap forward;hard core;pluralism;practical-ideology;protective belt;researsh programs;totalitarianism
    Date: 2005-03
    Issue Date: 2016-07-18 17:31:58 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 就過去所定義下的中國(共)研究典範嬗移而論, 西方學界對於[大躍進]起源的研究可與之對應, [極權主義]典範與[多元主義]典範的研究結論可謂涇渭分明. 本文認為, 這五十多年來的中國研究, 由於[極權主義]典範的[硬核]未變, 所以該典範的適用性至始為最高, 而[派系政治]途徑僅存在於[極權主義]典範的[保護帶]中. 本文採取此架構, 以大躍進的起源為例, 重新檢視[極權主義]典範和[派系政治]途徑的定義. 研究結果發現: 第一, [極權主義]典範制約下的中共政治, [派系政治]確實存在於該典範中; 第二, [派系政治]的成因主要是權力鬥爭, 次為政策分歧或官僚組織利益; 第三, [派系政治]的行動體是[非正式團體], 而非[派系]; 最後, 若以權力鬥爭為[派系政治]主要成因, 則鬥爭結果趨向[零和]結局, 若以政策分歧或官僚組織利益形成, 則趨向[非零和]結局.
    In this article, we attempt to combine the paradigm of totalitarianism and pluralism to analyze the intent of "factional politics". Three main debates regarding "factional politics" exist in academic circles, including the contributing factor to the theme, the quality of actor in factional politics, and the various outcomes of factional struggles? We take the origin of the Great Leap Forward as an example to examine the three arguments and to identify the conceptual foundation of factional politics. The findings of the research include: first, power struggle is the main cause of factional politics. Second, the informal groups are key actions in the factional policy. Lastly, the informal group resulting from the power struggle leads to zero-sum game consequences. We hope that by way of discussions of this article to clarity the concept of factional politics.
    Relation: 中國大陸研究, 48(1), 85-104
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Mainland China Studies] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    48(1)p85-104.pdf1120KbAdobe PDF2799View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback