English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50796601      Online Users : 713
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 文學院 > 哲學系 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/99012


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/99012


    Title: 《大乘莊嚴經論》的兩種唯識三性說模型
    Authors: 耿晴
    Contributors: 哲學系
    Keywords: 《 大乘莊嚴經論》;三性說;單層結構;雙層結構;《辯中邊論》
    Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra;Theory of Three Natures;single-layer model;double-layer model;Madhyântavibhāga
    Date: 2015-12
    Issue Date: 2016-07-13 14:29:42 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文首先檢討過去學者對於《大乘莊嚴經論》三性說的討論，然後簡述單層結構與雙層結構兩種不同的三性說模型。據此對於現存《大乘莊嚴經論》的頌文進行仔細的文本分析，主張其中包含了單層與雙層結構兩種不同的三性說模型。現存《大乘莊嚴經論》頌文〈真實品〉中隱含支持的是單層結構三性說；但〈述求品〉明白主張的則是雙層結構三性說。類似的狀況也出現在《辯中邊論》中：〈相品〉與〈真實品〉分別主張單層與雙層結構的三性說。然而本文也進一步指出，不同於某些學者的主張，雙層結構三性說並不必然蘊涵依他起性是終極清淨的、因而無需滅除。事實上，本文認為在整部現存《大乘莊嚴經論》的頌文以及散文註釋中，都找不到明確支持「終極清淨依他起性」概念的證據。最後，依據現存《大乘莊嚴經論》中存在兩種三性說模型以及《攝大乘論》對於《大乘莊嚴經論》引用之不一致的兩個線索，本文建議現存《大乘莊嚴經論》頌文應該被視為是一個多層次的文獻，其中至少包含較古老以及較新的兩個文獻層次。
    This paper begins with a criticial review of the scholarly discussions of the Theory of Three Natures (trisvabhāva-nirdeśa) in the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra. I then give a brief introduction to the two different models for the Theory of Three Natures, i.e., the single-layer vs. the double-layer model. With the distinction in mind, I carefully examine the verses in the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra and conclude that the sixth chapter implicitly supports the single-layer model whereas the eleventh chapter explicitly endorses the double-layer model. A similar situation, as I have argued, also appears in the Madhyântavibhāga (verses only): there the first chapter supports the singled-layer model but the third chapter maintains the double-layer one. Different from other scholars’ opinions, I argue that even the double-layer model does not necessarily entail that the dependent nautre is ultimately pure and hence needs not be eliminated. In fact, I argue that throughout the whole Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra (verses only) and the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra-bhāṣya the notion of “ultimately pure dependent nature” is nowhere found. Finally, based on the two clues－i.e., there are two different models for the Three of Three Natures and that the Mahāyānasaṃgraha is inconsistent when quoting from Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra－, I suggest that our current version of the Mahāyānasūtrâlaṃkāra (verses only) should be viewed as a multilayered text, consisting of older and newer strata.
    Relation: 臺大佛學研究, 30, 1-63
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[哲學系] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    1-63.pdf1168KbAdobe PDF2550View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback