政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98902

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98902

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | 全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 50967384 在线人数 : 923

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

搜寻范围

查询小技巧：

您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果

若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据

进阶搜寻

主页 ‧ 登入 ‧ 上传 ‧ 说明 ‧ 关于政大典藏 ‧ 管理

到手机版

政大機構典藏 > 理學院 > 心理學系 > 學位論文 > Item 140.119/98902

请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98902

题名:	成人依戀風格在羅夏克墨漬測驗上的表現：Fonagy精神分析理論的檢證 The performance of Rorschach inkblot test in adult attachment style: a verification of Fonagy’s psychodynamic theory
作者:	林楷庭 Lin, Kai Ting
贡献者:	林耀盛 Lin, Yaw Sheng 林楷庭 Lin, Kai Ting
关键词:	羅夏克墨漬測驗依戀理論 Fonagy精神分析論 Rorschach inkblot test Attachment theory Fonagy`s psychodynamic theory
日期:	2016
上传时间:	2016-07-11 17:41:58 (UTC+8)
摘要:	研究目的：本研究釐清不同成人依戀風格在羅夏克墨漬測驗上的表現，並檢證Fonagy的精神分析理論，進而反思臨床心理學上的應用。研究程序：研究期間，共招募到302位大學部學生填寫《親密關係經驗量表—關係結構版》。而後，根據量表信、效度分析後，篩選出高焦慮依戀分數、高逃避依戀分數及兩分數均低之控制組各25人，邀請其參與羅夏克墨漬測驗。最終收取焦慮依戀組12人、逃避依戀組12人、安全依戀控制組15人進行資料分析。研究結果：認知及投入向度方面，焦慮依戀者與逃避依戀者在F%顯著高於安全依戀者；同時，焦慮依戀者在Complexity、Sy、Blend、M及MC 表現亦差於安全依戀者，答題使用範圍則顯示Dd%較高、W%較低。情緒指標方面，焦慮依戀者在V變數上顯著高於其他兩組。人際互動方面，焦慮依戀者的SumH及H顯著低於安全依戀者。研究貢獻：本研究初步支持Fonagy精神分析論於不安全依戀者的認知與心智化、情緒控制與人際表徵分化等證據。此一結果亦可增加臨床實務中對不安全依戀者的衡鑑遞增效度，並探究其背後的心理病理機制。 Objective: When attachment comes to assessment, many clinicians would utilize self-report inventories to gather information. However, different attachment styles, in fact, represent diverse behavior patterns; thus, using instruments adopting multi-rating techniques such as the Rorschach would be ideal. Based on Fonagy’s psychodynamic theory and past Rorschach results, we predict participants with different attachment styles will have different pattern in Rorschach task. Methods: We conducted a double-blind research design and recruited 302 volunteers. All participants were required to fill out the Experiences in Close Relationship - Relationship Structure inventory, a measurement used to classify the adult attachment styles. The top 7% of highest scoring participants on the Anxiety Dimension were assigned to the Anxiety Group(ANG), and the same strategy was applied to those in the Avoidance Group(AVG). The Control Group(CG) consisted of 7% of the randomly-selected individuals who scored below the means of both Anxiety and Avoidance Dimensions. Participants in these three groups were invited and encouraged to take the Rorschach test according to the R-PAS. Results: Current research collected 39 participants Rorschach protocols (n = 12 for both the ANG and ACG; n = 15 for the CG). Results shows that both ANG and AVG have higher F% then CG, and ANG have lower Complexity, Sy, Blend, M, W%, MC, SumH and H then CG. ANG have higher V then AVG and CG. Conclusion: Current results partially supported Fonagy’s psychodynamic theory. Results also support using multi-rating tasks to increase assessment validity when evaluating different attachment styles in clinical settings.
參考文獻:	王雅鈴（2007）：《華人依戀焦慮傾向與忍耐調控機制：對偶資料之多層次模式分析》。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系，碩士論文。王慶福、王郁茗（2010）：〈台灣當今的依戀研究：系統性回顧與後設分析〉。2010 國際心理治療研究學會台灣分會(TWSPR)國際學術研討會，發表論文。林怡青（2007）：〈哀悼與親職功能關係之探討〉。《台灣精神醫學通訊》。林旻沛、丁建谷、賴雅純、柯慧貞（2005）：〈不同成人依戀型態大學生在網路成癮傾向上之差異〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，第 18 期，頁 93-119。孫頌賢（2007）：《大學生伴侶間人際行為對愛情依戀的影響》。國立政治大學心理學研究所，碩士論文。孫頌賢、修慧蘭（2007）：〈成人依戀的測量：成人世界中不同依戀對象的測量差異與關連〉。《中華心理衛生學刊》，第 20 期，頁 31-51。陳金定（1997）：《依戀行為與情緒調適能力之因果模式探討暨情緒調適團體對不安全依戀者依戀相關變項之實驗研究》。國立台灣師範大學教育心理與輔導學系，碩士論文。陳曉維（2004）：《成人依戀型態的內隱測量》。國立台灣大學心理學研究所，碩士論文。黃玉蓮、陳淑惠（2011）。〈成人依戀量表台灣修訂版的心理計量特性與預測心理適應之探討〉。《中華心理學刊》，第 53 期，頁 209-227。楊雅惠（2004）。《依戀、負向情緒調適預期和壓力因應對情緒經驗的影響歷程之探討：以大四學生的生涯抉擇壓力為例》。國立政治大學教育學系教育心理與輔導組，博士論文。謝玲玉、柯慧貞（2000）：〈依附形態與婦女的憂鬱症與焦慮症〉。《台灣精神醫學》，第 14 期，頁 49-60。譚偉象、張淑慧、夏允中、蔣世光（2006）：《邊緣性人格特質測驗》。台北：心理出版社。 Ainsworth. (1963). The development of infane-mother interaction among the Ganda. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), Determinants of infant behavior (pp. 67-112). New York: Wiley. Ainsworth. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. American Psychologist, 44, 709- 716. Ainsworth, Blehar, M., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of Attachment. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Baldwin, M., Keelan, J., Fehr, B., Enns, V. & Koh-Rangarajoo. (1996). Social- cognitive conceptualization of attachment working models: avaliability and accessibility effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 94- 109. Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A thest of four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226-244. Berant, E., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., & Segal, Y. (2005). Rorschach correlates of self-reported attachment dimensions: Dynamic manifestations of hyperactivating and deactivating strategies. Jorunal of Personality Assessment, 84, 70-81. Berant, E., & Wald, Y. (2009). Self-reported attachment patterns and rorschach- related scores of ego boundary, defense process, and thinking disorders. Jorunal of Personality Assessment, 91, 365-372. Bernecker, S. L., Constantino, M. J., Pazzaglia, A. M., Ravitz, P., & McBride, C. (2013). Patient Interpersonal and Cognitive Changes and Their Relation to Outcome in Interpersonal Psychotherapy for Depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22038 Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and loss: Vol. 1. Attachment. New York: Basic Books. Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationship (pp. 46-76). New York: The Guilford Press. Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105. Cassella, M. J., & Viglione, D. J. (2009). The rorschach texture response: a construct validation study using attachment theory. Jorunal of Personality Assessment, 91, 601-610. Cassidy, J. (1999). The nature of the child`s ties. In J. Cassidy & P. S. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical application. New York: The Guilford Press. Christenson, R. M. & Wilson, W. P. (1985). Assessing pathology in the separation- individution process by an inventory: a preliminary report. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorder, 173, 561-565. Collins, N. L. (1996). Working model of attachment: implication for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810-832. Collins, N. L. & Read, S. J. (1990). Adult attachment, working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 644-663. Crowell, J., Fraley, R. C., & Shaver, P. (1999). Measurement of individual differences in adolescent and adult attachment. In J. Cassidy & P. S. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical application. New York: The Guilford Press. Daly, K. D., & Mallinckrodt, B. (2009). Experienced therapists` approach to psychotherapy for adult with attachment avoidance or attachment anxiety. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56, 549-563. Exner, J. E. (2003). The Rorschach: A comprehensive system (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ, US: John Wiley & Sons Inc. Exner, J. E., & Erdberg, S. P. (2005). The Rorschach: A Comprehensive System, volume 2: Advanced Interpretation. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Fonagy, P. (2010). Attachment theory and psychoanalysis. London: Other Press, LLC. Fonagy, P., Gergely, G., Jurist, E. L., & Target, M. (2002). Affect regualtion, mentalization, and the development of the self. London: Other Press LLC. Fonagy, P., Redfern, S., & Charman, T. (1997). The relationship between belief- desire reasoning and a projective measure of attachment security(SAT). British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 51-61. Fraley, R. C., Heffernan, M. E., Vicary, A. M., & Brumbaugh, C. C. (2011). The experiences in close relationships - relationship structures questionnaire: a method for assessing attachment orientations across relationships.Psychological Assessment, 23, 615-625. Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item-response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350-365. Funder, D.C. (2012). Persons, situations and person-situation interactions. In O.P. John, R. Robins & L. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of Personality (3rd Ed.), pp. 568-580. New York: Guilford. Gabbard, G. (2005/2007). Psychodynamic psychiatry in clinical practice, 4th ed. Washington D. C.: American Psychiatric Publishing. George, C., Kaplan, N., & Main, M. (1996). Adult Attachment Interview Protocol (3ed ed.). Unpublished manuscript. University of California at Berkeley. Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Babaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the implicit association test: III. meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 14-41. Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511-524. Hesse, E. (1999). The adult attachment interview: protocal, method of analysis, and empirical studies. In J. Cassidy & P. S. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of attachment: theory, research, and clinical application. New York: The Guilford Press. Holt, R., Rapaport, D., Gill, M. & Schafer, R. (1968). Diagnostic Psychological Testing, revised ed. New York: International Universities Press. James. (1890). Principle of psychology. New York: Holt. Kohout, F. J., Berkman, L. F., Evans, D. A. & Cornoni-Hutley, J. (1993). Two shorter forms of the CES-D depression symptoms index, Journal of Aging Health, 5, 179-193. Kring, A., Johnson, S., Davison, G. C., & Neale, J. M. (2009). Abnormal psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Lerner, P. M. (1997). Psycholoanalytic perspective in the Rorschach. New Jersey: Analytic Press. Lerner, P. M. (2005). Defense and its assessment: the lerner defense scale. In R. F. Bornstein & J. M. Masling (Eds.), Scoring the Rorschach: Seven Validated System. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Lewis, M. (1994). Does attachment imply a relationship or multiple relationships? Psychological Inquiry, 5, 47-51. Levy, K. N., Meehan, K. B., Auerbach, J. S., & Blatt, S. J. (2005). Concept of the Object on the Rorschach Scale. In R. F. Bornstein & J. M. Masling (Eds.), Scoring the Rorschach: Seven Validated System. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahler, M. S., Pine, F. & Bergman, A. (1975). The psychological birth of the human infant. New York: Basic Books. Mayman, M. (1977). A multi-dimentional view of the Rorschach movement response. In Rorschach Psychology, ed. Rickers-Ovsiankina. Huntington, NY: Krieger, pp. 229-250. McBride, C., Atkinson, L., Quilty, L. C., & Bagby, R. M. (2006). Attachment as moderator of treatment outcome in major depression: a randomized control trial of interpersonal psychotherapy versus cognitive behavior therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 74(6), 1041-1054. Meins, E., Fernyhough, C., Wainwright, R., Gupta, M. D., Fradley, E., & Tuckey, M. (2002). Maternal Mind-Mindedness and Attachment Security as Predictors of Theory of Mind Understanding. Child Development, 73, 1715-1726. Meyer, G. J., Hsiao, W.-C., Viglione, D. J., Mihura, J. L., & Abraham, L. M. (2013). Rorschach scores in applied clinical practice: a survey of perceived validity by experienced clinicians. Jorunal of Personality Assessment, 95, 351-365. Meyer, G. J., Viglione, D. J., Mihura, J. L., Erard, R. E., & Erdberg, P. (2011). Rorschach performance assessment system: administration, coding, interpretation, and technical manual. Teledo, Ohio Rorschach Performance assessment System, LLC. Mihura, J. J., Meyer, G. J., Dumitrascu, N., & Bombel, G. (2013). The validity of individual rorschach variables: systematic reviews and meta-analyses of the comprehensive system. Psychological Bulltin, 139, 548-605. Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2008). Adult attachment and affect regulation. In J. C. P. R. Shaver (Ed.), Handbook of attachment: Theory, research, and clinical applications (2nd ed.) (pp. 503-531). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press. Moreira, H., Martins, T., Gouveia, M. J. & Canavarro, M. C. (2015). Assessing adult attachment across different contexts: validation of Portuguese cersion of the Experience in Close Relationships-Relationship Structure questionnaire. Journal of Personality Assessment, 97, 22-30. Ontai, L. L., & Thompson, R. A. (2008). Attachment, Parent–Child Discourse and Theory-of-Mind Development. Social Development, 17, 47–60. Rorschach, H. (1921/1942). Psychodiagnostics. Bern, Switzerland: Huber. Sahachtel, E. (1966). Experiential Foundation of Rorschach’s test. New York: Basic Books. Shweder, R. A. (2000). The psychology of practice and the practice of the three psychologies. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 207–222. Su, W.-S. (2012). Cultural and linguistic adaptability of the rorschach performance assessment system as a measure of schizophrenia spectrum symptomatology and severity of mental disturbance in Taiwan. Unpublished doctor’s thesis, Alliant International University. Teyber, E., & McClure, F. H. (2011). Interpersonal Process in Therapy: An Integrative Model, 6e. New York: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning. Urist, J. (1977). The rorschach test and the assessment of object relations. J Pers Assess, 41, 3-9. Viglione, D. J., Blume-marcovici, A. C., Miller, H. L., Giromini, L., & Meyer, G. (2012). An inter-rater reliability study for the rorschach performance assessment system. Jorunal of Personality Assessment, 94, 607-612. Weiner, I. B. (1998). Principles of rorschach interpretation. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Wimmer, & Perner. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children`s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103-128.
描述:	碩士國立政治大學心理學系 101752014
資料來源:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G1017520141
数据类型:	thesis
显示于类别:	[心理學系] 學位論文

文件中的档案:

档案	大小	格式	浏览次数
014101.pdf	866Kb	Adobe PDF2	2382	检视/开启

在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - 回馈