政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98839
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造訪人次 : 51620459      線上人數 : 752
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/98839


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98839


    題名: 企業CEO之權力型態與融資偏好關聯性之研究-以上市公司為例
    CEO Power Type and Preference on Financing Instruments-Evidences from Listed Companies in Taiwan
    作者: 鍾依玲
    貢獻者: 張清福
    鍾依玲
    關鍵詞: CEO權力
    融資決策
    CEO Power
    Financing Strategy
    日期: 2016
    上傳時間: 2016-07-11 16:54:14 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在企業中擔任領導者的CEO，對於公司決策之執行具有重大影響力，對於擁有不同權力型態之CEO，在公司面臨外部資金需求時，是否因其自身的條件因素，而影響其作出不同的融資決策。本研究之CEO權力乃參考Finkelstein(1992)與Grabke-Rundell and Gomez-Mejia(2002)之定義，將CEO權力分類為專家知識權力、聲望權力、結構權力與所有權權力四種型態，以2006至2015年的台灣上市公司為樣本，探討CEO之權力型態如何影響公司外部融資偏好。研究結果顯示，具備不同權力之CEO會因其權力指標不同而作出不同的融資決策，高聲望權力與高所有權之CEO傾向權益融資為主，高專家知識權力與高結構權力的CEO則選擇優先採取負債融資之方式。
    CEO plays a key role in forming a variety of business strategies. This study investigates the relation between CEO power type and preference on financing instruments when company needs external funds.
    Based on Finkelstein(1992), Grabke-Rundell and Gomez-Mejia’s(2002), the CEO power is classified as four types: expert knowledge power, reputation power, structure power and ownership power. In addressing how CEO power type influences her/his preference on financing instruments, this sample consists of all listed companies in Taiwan for the period for 2006 to 2015.
    The empirical result indicated that CEO power type does matter in choosing financing instrument. CEO with high reputation power or high ownership power prefers equity financing while those with high expert knowledge power or high structure power prefer liability financing.
    參考文獻: 王俊元，2010，高階文官在決策過程扮演的角色之研究，考銓研究報告，考
    試院，臺北。
    牛建波，2013，高管權力研究的評述與基本框架構建，公司治理，2，頁1-
    29。
    林秀鳳與李建然，2008，管理特質對企業績效之影響，中山管理評論，第16
    卷，第4 期，頁703-742。
    吳昆皇，1995，上市公司董事會組成與特性對企業經營績效之關聯性研究，
    國立臺灣大學商學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    吳建頤，1999，董事會規模對公司價值的影響，國立中正大學財務金融研究
    所碩士論文。
    洪世馨，2003，設立外部董事與企業經營績效之關係，國立成功大學會計學
    研究所碩士論文。
    張明峰，1991，股權結構對公司績效影響之研究，國立政治大學企業管理研
    究所未出版碩士論文。
    曾江洪、何鵬，2004，從格拉索事件看CEO 權力對CEO 薪酬的影響，經濟
    管理，15，頁58-61。
    劉韻僖，2006，臺灣高科技產業高階經營團隊及董事會權力與組織績效關係
    之研究，交大管理學報，26(1)，頁173-200。
    劉韻僖、林玟廷，2010，CEO 權力與薪酬關係之實證研究－代理和資源依
    賴觀點，中原企管評論，8(1)，頁35-60。
    韓立岩、李慧，2009，CEO權力與財務危機—中國上市公司的經驗證據，金
    融研究，343(1)，頁179-193。
    Adams, R. B., H. Almeida and D. Ferreira. 2005. Powerful CEOs and their impact on corporate performance. Review of Financial Studies 18(4): 1403-1432.
    Baskin, J. 1989. An empirical in investigation of the pecking order hypothesis.
    Financial management 18: 26-35.
    Bhagat, S. and B. S. Black. 2002. The non-correlation between board independence and long-term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law 27: 231-273.
    Chatterjee, A. and D. C. Hambrick. 2007. It’s all about me: Narcissistic Chief Executive Officers and Their Effects on Company Strategy and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 52(3): 351-386.
    Daily, C. M. and J. L. Johnson. 1997. Sources of CEO power and firm financial performance: A longitudinal assessment. Journal of Management 23 (20): 97-117.
    Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, and J. L. Johnson. 1998. Meta-Analytic Reviews of Board Composition, Leadership Structure, and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal 19(3): 269-290.
    Fama, E.F. 1980. Agency Problems and the Theory of Firm. Journal of Political Economy 88(2): 288-307.
    Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of Ownership and Control. Journal of Law and Economics 26(2): 301-325.
    Finkelstein, S. 1992. Power in Top Management Teams: Dimensions, Measurement and Validation. Academy of Management Journal 35(5): 505-538.
    Finkelstein, S. and D. C. Hambrick. 1990. Top-Management-Team Tenure and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Managerial Discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(3): 484-503.
    Frank, M. Z. and V. K. Goyal. 2003. Testing the Pecking Order Theory of Capital Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 67: 217-248.
    Fuerst and Kang. 2000. Corporate governance, expected operating performance and pricing. Working paper. Yale School of Management. New Haven.
    Geletkanycz, M. A. and D. C. Hambrick. 1997. The External Ties of Top Executives: Implications for Strategic Choice and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(4): 654-681.
    Grabke-Rundell, A. and L.R. Gomez-Mejia. 2002. Power as a Determinant of Executive Compensation. Human Resource Management Review 12: 3-23.
    Haleblian, J. and S. Finkelstein. 1993. Top management team size, CEO dominance and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal 36(4): 844-863.
    Haynes, K.T. and A. Hillman. 2010. The effect of board capital and CEO power on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 31(11): 1145-1163.
    Hayward, M. L. A. and D. C. Hambrick. 1997. Explaining The Premiums Paid for Large Acquisitions: Evidence of CEO Hubris. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(1):103-127.
    Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3(3): 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C. and R. Ruback. 1983. The Market for Corporate Control: The Scientific Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.
    Jensen, M. C. 1986. Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economic Review 76(2): 323-329.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit and the Failure of Internal Control Systems. Journal of Finance 48(3): 831-880.
    Kramer, R. M. 1999. Trust and Distrust in Organizations: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions. Annual Review of Psychology 50: 569-598.
    Lemmon, M. L. and K. V. Lins. 2003. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: Evidence from the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of Financial 58(4): 1445-1468.
    Mangel, R. and H. Singh. 1993. Ownership structure, board relationships and CEO compensation in large US corporations. Accounting and Business Research 23: 339-350.
    Meyer J. W. and B. Rowan. 1977. Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure As Myth And Ceremony. American Journal of Sociology 83(2): 340-363.
    Milbourn, T.T. 2003. CEO reputation and stock-based compensation. Journal of Financial Economics 68(2): 233–262.
    Myers, S. C. 1977. Determinants of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 799-819.
    Myers, S. C. 1984. The capital structure puzzle. Journal of Finance 39: 575-592.
    Myers, S. C. and N. S. Majluf. 1984. Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics. 13: 187-221.
    Pfeffer, J. and G.R. Salancik. 1978. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. Harper and Row, New York.
    Pfeffer, J. 1992. Managing with Power. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Shen, W. and A. A. Cannella. 2002. Power Dynamics Within Top Management and Their Impacts on CEO Dismissal Followed by Inside Succession. Academy of Management Journal 45(6): 1195-1206.
    Shyam-Sunder, L. and S. C. Myers. 1999. Testing static tradeoff against pecking order models of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics 51: 219-244.
    Ting, H.I. 2013. CEO turnover and shareholder wealth: Evidence from CEO power in Taiwan. Journal of Business Research 66: 2466-2472.
    Weisbach, M. 1988. Outside Directors and CEO Turnover. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 431-460.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    103353022
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103353022
    資料類型: thesis
    顯示於類別:[會計學系] 學位論文

    文件中的檔案:

    沒有與此文件相關的檔案.



    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋