English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 114014/145046 (79%)
Visitors : 52044847      Online Users : 649
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98644


    Title: 以專利衡量研發創新投入之資源錯置問題 - 以中國內外資製造業廠商為例
    Misallocation of R&D Inputs by Using Patent Value Index - A Case of the Manufacturing Companies with Foreign Investment and Domestic Investment
    Authors: 歐潤芸
    Contributors: 李文傑
    王信實
    歐潤芸
    Keywords: 公司所有權
    研發創新
    專利價值指數
    資源錯置
    Ownership
    Innovation
    Patent value index
    Misallocation
    Date: 2016
    Issue Date: 2016-07-01 15:24:12 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 創新能力是近年產業發展的趨勢，過去文獻常只單用專利數量來衡量研發效率，方法直觀卻無法真實反應專利價值。本研究嘗試利用專利數量及專利價值指數一起衡量廠商研發投入與產出間的效率，研究對象為2005年至2007年間中國規模水準以上廠商，利用其專利總價值指數與該公司所投入的資本要素與勞動要素探討該公司資源錯置的現象。有鑑於中國積極引進外資企業進駐中國，本研究依公司註冊登記類型將公司分為國有企業、民營企業及外資企業三大類，藉以研究中國經濟發展政策對此三類企業研發效率發展的影響。結果顯示，國有企業的研發效率優於民營企業與外資企業。因為政府積極實施產業政策以促進國內研發創新能力，給予國有企業相當多的政策優惠，故國有企業擁有較高的研發生產力；而民營企業因核心技術的不足，多以替國外大廠代工為主要經營模式，研發創新能力較低。中國改革開放後，積極引進外資企業進駐中國，而當時外資企業看中的是中國低廉的勞動成本與廣大的潛在市場，核心研發技術並未引進中國，導致外資企業研發能力在資料區間內呈現最為低落的情形。
    Innovation has become the trend for the industrial development nowadays. In the past, little research can measure the industrial outcome due to inadequate knowledge on patent value index. In this paper, I compute the patent value index based on the surveyed data of the manufacturing firms in China from 2005 to 2007. The misallocation between research output and input is computed as the major result. Based on firm registration data, I divided firms into three categories, state-owned firms, private firms and foreign firms. Our result shows that state-owned firms have higher innovation efficiency than others. The high research efficiency belonging to state-owned firms benefited from many industrial policies and preferential policy implemented by government. Due to the lack of innovation technology characterized by OEM (Original equipment manufacturer) model, private firms record lower research performance. Other than domestic firms, foreign firms simply utilize cheap production inputs and the larger market size as a base for process trade. Innovation activities are only conducted by parent companies. That is why foreign firms’ record lower innovation efficiency in this research.
    Reference: 英文參考文獻
    1. Aiginger, K. (2014). Industrial Policy for a sustainable growth path. Policy Paper, (13).
    2. Aitken, B. J., & Harrison, A. E. (1999). Do domestic firms benefit from direct foreign investment? Evidence from Venezuela. American economic review, 605-618.
    3. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: Past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of management review, 20(2), 343-378.
    4. Chen, C. P., Hu, J. L., & Yang, C. H. (2013). Produce patents or journal articles? A cross-country comparison of R&D productivity change. Scientometrics, 94(3), 833-849.
    5. Coase, R. H. (1937). The nature of the firm. economica, 4(16), 386-405.
    6. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. The economic journal, 99(397), 569-596.
    7. Djankov, S., & Hoekman, B. (2000). Foreign investment and productivity growth in Czech enterprises. The World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 49-64.
    8. Driffield, N. (2001). The impact on domestic productivity of inward investment in the UK. The Manchester School, 69(1), 103-119.
    9. Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (1996). Trade in ideas Patenting and productivity in the OECD. Journal of international Economics, 40(3), 251-278.
    10. Griffith, R., Redding, S., & Van Reenen, J. (2004). Mapping the two faces of R&D: Productivity growth in a panel of OECD industries. Review of economics and statistics, 86(4), 883-895.
    11. Gu, F. (2005). Innovation, future earnings, and market efficiency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20(4), 385-418.
    12. Howitt, P. (2000). Endogenous growth and cross-country income differences.American Economic Review, 829-846.
    13. Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2009). Misallocation and manufacturing TFP in China and India (No. w13290). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    14. Hsieh, C. T., & Klenow, P. J. (2012). The life cycle of plants in India and Mexico(No. w18133). National Bureau of Economic Research.
    15. Jaef, F., & Roberto, N. (2012). Entry, Exit and Misallocation Frictions. Mimeo, IMF.
    16. Klenow, P. J., & Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2005). Externalities and growth.Handbook of economic growth, 1, 817-861.
    17. Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankerman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators*. The Economic Journal, 114(495), 441-465.
    18. Lutz, S., & Talavera, O. (2004). Do Ukrainian firms benefit from FDI?.Economics of Planning, 37(2), 77-98.
    19. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra‐industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
    20. Riboud, M. (2000). Foreign investment and restructuring: the evidence from Hungary (Vol. 453). World Bank Publications.
    21. Robinson, J. A. (2009). Industrial policy and development: a political economy perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank..
    22. Romer P., 1990, “Endogenous Technological Change“, Journal of Political Economy 98(5)：71-102.
    23. Song, Z., & Wu, G. L. (2011). A structural estimation on capital market distortions in UK and Chinese manufacturing firms. Unpublished manuscript, Booth Sch. Bus., Univ. Chicago.
    24. Tsai, K. H., & Wang, J. C. (2004). The R&D performance in Taiwan`s electronics industry: a longitudinal examination. R&D Management, 34(2), 179-189.
    25. Xu, B., & Chiang, E. P. (2005). Trade, patents and international technology diffusion. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 14(1), 115-135.
    26. Yang, M. J. (2011). Micro-level misallocation and selection: Estimation and aggregate implications. Mimeo, UC Berkeley.

    中文參考文獻
    1. 何潔. (2000). 外國直接投資對中國工業部門外溢效應的進一步精確量化. 世界經濟, 23(12), 29-36.
    2. 辛永容,陳圻, &肖俊哲. (2009).要素產出彈性與技術進步貢獻率的測算. 管理科學 ,22 (1), 113-120.
    3. 徐濤. (2003).引進FDI與中國技術進步. 世界經濟 , 26 (10), 22-27
    4. 張小蒂, & 王中興. (2008). 中國 R&D 投入與高技術產業研發產出的相關性分析. 科學學研究, 26(3), 526-529.
    5. 謝長泰,&宋錚. (2015).抓大放小：中國國有部門的轉型
    6. 蔣殿春, &夏良科. (2005).外商直接投資對中國高技術產業技術創新作用的經驗分析. 世界經濟 , 28 (8), 3-10.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    經濟學系
    103258027
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103258027
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[經濟學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    802701.pdf973KbAdobe PDF279View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback