政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98561

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98561

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50978404 Online Users : 910

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Finance > Theses > Item 140.119/98561

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98561

Title:	投資銀行購併顧問費用取決因素 The Factors Affecting M&A Advisory Fee
Authors:	許孝銘 Syu, Shao Ming
Contributors:	吳啟銘許孝銘 Syu, Shao Ming
Keywords:	購併費用財務顧問購併顧問價值
Date:	2016
Issue Date:	2016-07-01 14:58:34 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究探討購併費用是否反映投資銀行在購併案中提供的價值,與過去研究不同的是,過去研究大多從主併公司的角度進行探討,本研究分別研究主併公司及被併公司購併顧問費用。因為購併過程中主併方及被併方都會聘請投資銀行擔任財務顧問,同時對兩端進行分析可以比對投資銀行在擔任不同角色時購併顧問費用取決因素是否不同,並且可以對投資銀行提供給主併公司及被併公司的價值進行推論。本研究以美國購併案為研究對象,主併與被併公司皆為美國公司,研究期間為 2000 年至 2015 年。由 885 筆被併顧問費用購併交易樣本及 229 筆主併顧問費用購併交易樣本進行研究,實證結果發現:(1) 被併公司股價 CAR 越高,被併公司顧問費用越高,(2) 購併案所花時間越短,被併公司顧問費用越高。對於主併公司購併顧問費用而言,(1) 投資銀行排名上升,主併公司顧問費用越低。原先我們認為購併溢價會影響購併顧問費用,但透過實證研究發現,不論對主併公司或被併公司投資銀行而言,購併溢價與購併顧問費用統計上均無顯著影響。 This paper investigates the relationship between M&A advisory fee and the advisory value which investment bank provides in M&A transaction. Most of papers studied M&A issues related to acquirer, different with previous studies, we not only focus on target fee but also acquirer advisory fee. Both of target and acquirer firm hire financial advisors to help them deal with the M&A transaction, to check if the factors affecting M&A advisory fee are different, we divided the model into two parts, one focus on target advisory fee, and the other focus on acquirer advisory fee. Evidence from 885 M&A transactions focus on target and 229 M&A transactions focus on acquirer between 2000 and 2015 supports that (1) Higher target company CAR, higher target M&A advisory fee, (2) Faster deal closing, higher the target M&A advisory fee. For acquirer investment bank, the evidence shows that (1) As the ranking move up, the advisory fee should be lower. One of the hypothesis is that higher premium, higher target and acquirer advisory fee, according to the result, we found that the premium is not statistically significant to target and acquirer advisory fee.
Reference:	Bowers, H. M., & Miller, R. E. (1990). Choice of investment banker and shareholders` wealth of firms involved in acquisitions. Financial Management, 34-44. Chahine, S., & Ismail, A. (2009). Premium, merger fees and the choice of investment banks: A simultaneous analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 49(2), 159-177. Chuang, K. S. The role of investment banks on the impact of firm performance in mergers and acquisitions: evidence from the Asia-Pacific market. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 1-23. da Silva Rosa, R., Lee, P., Skott, M., & Walter, T. (2004). Competition in the market for takeover advisers. Australian Journal of Management, 29(1 suppl), 61-92. Diamond, P. A., & Maskin, E. (1979). An equilibrium analysis of search and breach of contract, I: Steady states. The Bell Journal of Economics, 282-316. Francis, B. B., Hasan, I., & Sun, X. (2014). Does relationship matter? The choice of financial advisors. Journal of Economics and Business, 73, 22-47. Kesner, I. F., Shapiro, D. L., & Sharma, A. (1994). Brokering mergers: An agency theory perspective on the role of representatives. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 703-721. Kurkela, M. (2014). "Boutique" financial advisors vs. full-service investment banks: An analysis of advisor choice and deal outcomes in mergers and acquisitions, Master’s Thesis, Aalto University School of Business. Lowinski, F., Schiereck, D., & Thomas, T. W. (2004). The effect of cross-border acquisitions on shareholder wealth—evidence from Switzerland. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 22(4), 315-330. McLaughlin, R. M. (1990). Investment-banking contracts in tender offers: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 28(1-2), 209-232. McLaughlin, R. M. (1992). Does the form of compensation matter?: Investment banker fee contracts in tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 223-260. Michel, A., Shaked, I., & Lee, Y. T. (1991). An evaluation of investment banker acquisition advice: the shareholders` perspective. Financial Management, 40-49. Mortensen, D. T. (1982). The matching process as a non-cooperative bargaining game. In The economics of information and uncertainty (pp. 233-258). University of Chicago Press. Rau, P. R. (2000). Investment bank market share, contingent fee payments, and the performance of acquiring firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(2), 293-324. Rau, P. R., Rodgers, K. J. (2002). Do bidders hire top-tier investment banks to certify value? Working Paper, Purdue University and Penn State University. Saunders, A., Srinivasan, A. (2001). Investment banking relationships and merger fees. Working Paper, University of Georgia, Terry College of Business. Schiereck, D., Sigl-Grüb, C., & Unverhau, J. (2009). Investment bank reputation and shareholder wealth effects in mergers and acquisitions. Research in International Business and Finance, 23(3), 257-273. Sibilkov, V., & McConnell, J. J. (2014). Prior client performance and the choice of investment bank advisors in corporate acquisitions. Review of Financial Studies, hhu031. Song, W., Wei, J. D., & Zhou, L. (2013). The value of “boutique” financial advisors in mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 20, 94-114. Plaksen, E. (2011). The Value of your Advisor’s Advice: An M&A perspective. SFI, University of Zurich. Walter, T. S., Yawson, A., & Yeung, C. P. (2008). The role of investment banks in M&A transactions: Fees and services. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 16(4), 341-369.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學財務管理研究所 103357006
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103357006
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Finance] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Size	Format
700601.pdf	1152Kb	Adobe PDF2	140	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback