政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98557
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51592446      在线人数 : 903
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98557


    题名: 研發扣抵與兩稅合一之政策效果 ‒ 以台灣與 OECD 國家比較
    The policy effect of research & development tax credit and dividend imputation credit – International comparison between Taiwan and OECD countries
    作者: 林奕成
    Lin, Yih Cheng
    贡献者: 何怡澄
    林奕成
    Lin, Yih Cheng
    关键词: 研發扣抵
    兩稅合一
    促進產業升級條例
    產業創新條例
    R&D tax credit
    dividend imputation credit
    Statute for Upgrading Industry
    Statute for Industrial Innovation
    日期: 2016
    上传时间: 2016-07-01 14:58:03 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 　　研發扣抵政策之有效性在過去文獻有著不一致的結果，許多研究者認為可能原因之一即為與兩稅合一的衝突，實施兩稅合一之後，在有限的資金之下將增加公司發放股利的誘因；同樣的，在實施研發扣抵後亦將增加公司研發投資的金額，都會影響彼此的政策效果。
    　　近年來台灣經歷獎勵投資條例、促進產業升級條例及現在的產業創新條例，其對投資之效果飽受爭論。而我國除採取研發扣抵政策外，亦實施兩稅合一政策以解決重複課稅之問題，因此在台灣兩稅合一與研發扣抵是否會互相衝突會是一項值得探討的議題。
    　　本文以 1996 年至 2014 年台灣與 OECD上市公司的非均衡追蹤資料 (Unbalanced panel data) 來進行分析。實證結果指出，同時實施兩稅合一及研發扣抵的國家相較於其他樣本，其股利支付與研發投資之間的關係呈現更為顯著的負相關，代表當同時實施雙重扣抵制度，兩項支出之間的衝突性更為明顯。
    　　本文另外也做了台灣與其他國家的比較，實證結果指出，台灣雖實施雙重扣抵制度，但其支出之間的關係，反而呈現較為顯著的正相關。可能的原因即為台灣之研發扣抵相較於兩稅合一，其誘因明顯為大，因此文末亦作了 difference in difference 的敏感度分析，但結果顯示不論是 1998 年兩稅合一或 2010 年產創條例實施後，研發投資與股利支付之間的關係並沒有顯著的改變。
    The effectiveness of R&D tax credit is inconsistent in past literature, and many researchers believe one possible reason is the impact of dividend imputation credit. After imputation credit, it will increase the company’s incentive to pay dividend. Also, after R&D tax credit, it will increase the payment of R&D investment. So both of the policy will affect the effect of each other.
    In recent years in Taiwan, we experienced Statute for the Encouragement of Investment, Statute for Upgrading Industry and current Statute for Industrial Innovation, and their effect on investment suffered controversy. In Taiwan, we have not only R&D tax credit, but also the implementation of dividend imputation to relieve the problem of double taxation, so it becomes an important issue.
    This paper examines the unbalanced panel data of Taiwan and OECD from 1996 to 2014. Empirical results indicate that in the context of both R&D tax credit and dividend imputation credit compared to the other sample, the negative correlation is more significant between the dividend payments and R&D investment. It means when we implement both credits, the payments of dividend and R&D conflict more.
    This paper also examines Taiwan with respect to OECD countries, and the empirical results indicate that although the implementation of both credits, the positive correlation is more significant between the two payments in Taiwan. One possible reason is that the R&D tax credit in Taiwan is obviously more attractive than the dividend imputation credit. Therefore, I also use the sensitive analysis of difference in difference to examine this problem. However, it shows that after the implementation of dividend imputation in 1998 or R&D tax credit of Statute for Upgrading Industry in 2010, the relationship of payments doesn’t differ obviously.
    參考文獻: 何怡澄、郭振雄、羅光達、陳國樑，(2014)。《產業創新條例第 10 條之稅式支出及績效評估》。財政部 103 年度委託研究計劃：財政部。
    汪瑞芝，(2002)。兩稅合一制前後上市公司股利發放、租稅規劃及資本結構之實證研究。未出版之博士論文，國立政治大學，會計學系，台北市文山區指南路二段64號。
    羅光達、單珮玲，(2013)。《我國兩稅合一制度現況檢討與未來改革方向》。財政部 102 年度委託研究計劃：財政部。

    Akhigbe, A., and J. Madura, (1996). Dividend policy and corporate performance, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 34: 1267–1287.
    Alli, K., A. Khan, and G. Ramirez, (1993). Determinants of corporate dividend policy: A factorial analysis, The Financial Review 28: 523–547.
    Auerbach, Alan J., (1984). Taxes, Firm Financial Policy, and the Cost of Capital: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Public Economics 23, 27–57.
    Baber, W., P. Fairfield, and J. Haggard, (1991). The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development, The Accounting Review 66 (October): 818–829.
    Bagwell, Laurie S., and John B. Shoven, (1989). Cash Distributions to Shareholders, Journal of Economic Perspectives 3, 129–140.
    Berger, P., (1993) Explicit and implicit tax effects of the R&D tax credit, Journal of Accounting Research 31 (Autumn): 131–171.
    Bernstein, J., (1986). The effect of direct and indirect tax incentives on Canadian industrial R&D expenditures, Canadian Public Policy 12-3: 438–448.
    Bhagat, S., and I. Welch, (1995). Corporate research and development investments: International comparisons, Journal of Accounting and Economics 19: 443–470.
    Bhattacharya, S., (1979). Imperfect Information, Dividend Policy, and the “Bird in the Hand Fallacy, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 10 (Spring): 259–270.
    Billings, B. A., and Y. Fried, (1999). The Effects of Taxes and Organizational Variables on Research and Development Intensity, R&D Management 29: 289–301.
    Black, E. L., J. Legoria, and K. F. Sellers, (2000). Capital Investment Effects of Dividend Imputation, The Journal of the American Taxation Association 22 (Fall): 40–59.
    Bradley, M., G. A. Jarrell, and E. Han Kim, (1984). On the Existence of an Optimal Capital Structure: Theory and Evidence. The Journal of Finance 39(3): 857–878.
    Brown, K. M., (1985). The R&D Tax Credit: An Evaluation of Evidence on Its Effectiveness, Washington, DC: A staff study prepared for the Joint Economic Committee, U.S. Congress (August 13, 1985), No. 99–73.
    Brown, P., and A. Clarkem (1993). The ex-dividend behaviour of Australian share prices before and after dividend imputation, Australian Journal of Management 18-1: 1–40.
    Coopers & Lybrand, (1992). International Tax Summaries, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    Coopers & Lybrand, (1998a). International Tax Summaries, New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    Coopers & Lybrand, (1998b). Economic benefits of the RD credit, Tax Notes 78-8: 1019–1039.
    Eisner, R. A. and M. Sullivan, (1984). The New Incremental Tax credit for R&D: Incentive or Disincentive, National Tax Journal 37 (June): 171–183.
    Goel, R. K., (1990). The Substitutability of Capital, Labor, and R&D in US Manufacturing, Bulletin of Economic Research 42(3): 211–223.
    Gordon, Roger and David F. Bradford, (1980). Taxation and the Stock Market Valuation of Capital Gains and Dividends: Theory and Empirical Results, Journal ofpublic Economics 14, 109–36.
    Grabwoski, H., (1968). The determinants of industrial research and development: A study of the chemical, drug and petroleum industries, Journal of Political Economy 82 (November/December): 1119–1143.
    Green, J., A. Stark, and H. Thomas, (1996). U.K. evidence on the market valuation of research and development expenditures, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 23 (March): 191–216.
    Hall, B., and J. Reenen, (2000). How effective are fiscal incentives for R&D? A review of the evidence, Research Policy 29: 449–469.
    Hill, C. W. and S. A. Snell, (1989). Effects of Ownership Structure and Control on Corporate Productivity, Academy of Management Journal 32(1): 25–46.
    Hoskisson, R. and R. Johnson, (1992). Corporate Restructuring and Strategic Change: the Effect on Diversification Strategy and R&D Intensity, Strategic Management Journal 13(6): 625–634.
    John, K. and J. Williams, (1985). Dividends, Dilution, and Taxes: A Signaling Equilibrium, Journal of Finance 40 (September): 1053–1070.
    Jorgenson, D. W., (1963). Capital theory and investment behavior, The American Economic Review, 52(3): 247–259.
    Kamian, M., and N. Schwartz, (1978). Self-financing of an R&D project, American Economic Review 68 (June): 252–261.
    Lev, B., and T. Sougiannis, (1996). The capitalization, amortization and value-relevance of R&D, Journal of Accounting and Economics 21: 107–138.
    Link, A. and J. Long., (1981). The Simple Economics of Basic Scientific Research: A Test of Nelson’s Diversification Hypothesis, The Journal of Industrial Economics 30 1: 105–109.
    Manly, T. S., D. W. Thomas, and C. T. Schulman, (2001). Assessing the impact of conflicting policy goals: The case of the investment tax credit and the research and development tax credit, Working paper series, Center for Business and Economic Research. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas.
    Mansfield, E., (1986). The R&D Tax Credit and Other Technology Policy Issues, American Economic Review 76(2): 190–194.
    Mansfield, E., and L. Switzer, (1985). How effective are Canada’s direct tax incentives for R and D?, Canadian Public Policy 11: 241–246.
    Mary Catherine Cleaveland, (2006). The Relationship between R&D Investment and Dividend Payment Tax Incentives and Their Role in the Dividend Tax Puzzle, ScholarWorks of Georgia State University.
    McClure, C., (1977). Must Corporate Income Be Taxed Twice?, Washington: Brookings Institution.
    McKenzie, K. and A. Thompson, (1995). Dividend Taxation and Equity Value: The Canadian Tax Changes of 1986, Canadian Journal of Economics 28: 463–472.
    McKenzie, K. and A. Thompson, (1997). The Economic Effects of Dividend Taxation, Technical Committee on Business Taxation Working Paper 96-7, Department of Finance, Ottawa, Ontario.
    Michelle Hanlon, Edward L. Maydew and Daniel Saavedra, (2013). Understanding Why Firms Hold So Much Cash: A Tax Risk Explanation, Working paper.
    Miller, M., and F. Modigliani, (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of shares, Journal of Business 34 (October): 411–433.
    Miller, M., and M. Scholes, (1978). Dividends and taxes, Journal of Financial Economics 6: 333–364.
    Partington, G. H., (1985). Dividend policy and its relationship to investment and financing policies: Empirical evidence, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 12 (Winter): 531–542.
    Partington, G. H., (1989). Variables influencing dividend policy in Australia: Survey results, Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 18 (Spring): 165–182.
    Poterba, J. and L. Summers, (1985). The economic effects of dividend taxation, NBER Working Paper No. W1353.
    Ross, S. A., (1977). The Determination of Financial Structure: The Incentive Signaling Approach, The Bell Journal of Economics. 8(1): 23–39.
    Schulman, C. T., D. W. Thomas, K. F. Sellers, and D. B. Kennedy, (1996). Effects of tax integration and capital gains tax on corporate leverage, National Tax Journal 49 (March): 31–54.
    Shehata, M., (1991). Self-selection bias and the economic consequences of accounting regulation: An application of two-stage switching regression to SFAS No. 2, The Accounting Review 66 (October): 768–787.
    Smith, D., (1995). What has dividend imputation done to R&D tax benefits?, Australian Accountant (December): 33–35.
    Sougiannis, T., (1994). The accounting based valuation of R&D, The Accounting Review 69 (January): 44–68.
    Switzer, L., (1984). The determinants of industrial R&D: A funds flow simultaneous equation approach, Review of Economics and Statistics 66: 163–168.
    Thomas, D. W., and K. F. Sellers, (1994). Eliminate the double tax on dividends, Journal of Accountancy (November): 86–90.
    Thomas, D. W., C. T. Schulman, and K. F. Sellers, (1996). Tax integration and corporate dividend policy: The Canadian experience, Working paper series, Center for Business and Economic Research. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas.
    Thomas, D. W., T. S. Manly, and C. T. Schulman, (2003). An international investigation of the influence of dividend taxation on research and development tax credits, Journal of the American Taxation Association 25 (Fall): 35–54.
    Tillinger, J. W., (1991). An analysis of the effectiveness of the research and experimentation tax credit in a q model of valuation, The Journal of the American Taxation Association 13 (Fall): 1–29.
    U. S. Department of Treasury, (1992). Integration of the Individual and Corporate Tax Systems. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office
    Woolridge, J. R. and C. Ghosh, (1988). An Analysis of Shareholder Reaction to Dividend Cuts and Omissions, Journal of Financial Research 11(4): 281–294.
    Woolridge, J. R. and C. Ghosh, (1991). Dividend Omissions and Stock Market Rationality, The Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 18(3): 315–330.
    Zodrow, G., (1991). On the “Traditional” and “New” Views of Dividend Taxation, National Tax Journal 44: 497–509.
    描述: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    財政學系
    103255004
    資料來源: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0103255004
    数据类型: thesis
    显示于类别:[財政學系] 學位論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    index.html0KbHTML2297检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈