政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98273

政大典藏 > Journals of NCCU > Journal of Librarianship and Information Science > Journal Articles > Item 140.119/98273

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98273

Title:	經濟學者及社會學者引用文獻特性及學術表現之研究
Other Titles:	Citation Behavior and Research Performance of Economists and Sociologists
Authors:	黃慕萱楊曉雯
Keywords:	經濟學者;社會學者;學術評鑑;書目計量學 Economist;Sociologist;Research evaluation;Academic evaluation;Bibliometrics
Date:	2012-05
Issue Date:	2016-06-23 17:19:29 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本研究採用引文分析方法，以臺灣地區出版之七種經濟學與12種社會學期刊為研究對象，從臺灣學者之引文角度，探討經濟學者及社會學者引用文獻特性及學術表現。在引用文獻特性方面，經濟學者引用文獻類型以期刊引用為主；社會學者則以圖書為主，顯示不同領域、學門引用文獻特性不同。在臺灣學者學術表現方面，首先瞭解學者於域內期刊與全域期刊被引用次數排名之差異，並進行域內被引次數與學術成就表現的相關檢定。結果顯示經濟學及社會學期刊於域內與全域之被引用次數排名無極大差異，也就是說兩種領域以少數域內期刊之引用次數排名即可用以代表多數期刊被引用數的排名。然而經濟學與社會學期刊域內被引次數與傑出學者與否的檢定中，雖然兩者被引次數的平均值有差異，但仍未達顯著差異；在被引次數排名與國科會計畫數的相關檢定方面，經濟學呈中度相關，但於社會學則未達顯著相關。因此，期刊引文分析未必能用來評鑑臺灣經濟學及社會學學者之學術表現，以期刊引文分析來評鑑臺灣經濟學與社會學學者學術表現時需謹慎進行。 This article uses citation analysis to study citation behavior and research performance of economists and sociologists in Taiwan. Regarding citation behavior, economists tend to cite materials from journal articles, while sociologists tend to apply citations from books. As for research performance, the results show that there is a consistency between citation rankings made among top economics and sociology journals and citation rankings made among journals of general fields. The consistency indicates that citation counts made among top economics and sociology journals can generally reflect the impact of researchers from the two fields. In contrast, rankings of highly cited researchers nonetheless show no close correlation with rankings of outstanding researchers. Also, the correlation between rankings of cited researchers and numbers of their research projects sponsored by National Science Council (NSC) is statistically moderate in economics while unobvious in sociology. The discovery suggests that citation analysis may not necessarily be applicable to evaluations of research performance in the fields of economics and sociology. Evaluations based on the standard of citation behavior require well-judged interpretations.
Relation:	圖書與資訊學刊, 80(4:1), 59-75 Journal of Librarianship and Information Science
Data Type:	article
DOI link:	http://dx.doi.org/10.6575/JoLIS.2012.80.04
DOI:	10.6575/JoLIS.2012.80.04
Appears in Collections:	[Journal of Librarianship and Information Science] Journal Articles

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
80(59-75).pdf		431Kb	Adobe PDF2	336	View/Open

社群 sharing

Loading...