English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50920059      Online Users : 777
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98186


    Title: 臺灣地區高中多元入學與教育機會的關聯性之實徵研究
    Other Titles: An Empirical Study on the Relationship between Multiple Entrance Program of Senior High School and Educational Opportunity in Taiwan
    Authors: 陳怡靖 ; 陳密桃 ; 黃毅志
    Keywords: 高中多元入學 ; 教育機會 ; 社經背景
     Multiple entrance program of senior high school ; Educational opportunity ; Social economic background
    Date: 2006-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-21 17:07:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 許多人批評高中多元入學使得高社經背景者在升學機會上占盡優勢，不符合機會的公平性，而建議回復聯考，但是聯考真的較不受社經背景影響，而較符合教育機會均等嗎？這仍需實徵資料來佐證。本研究以全國性大樣本資料「臺灣教育長期追蹤資料庫」（TEPS）做分析的結果顯示：相較於低社經背景的學生，高社經背景的學生在多元入學中的確占了優勢；他們有較多機會透過聯考入公立高中，與直升私立名校，而且高中成績較佳。低社經背景的學生在聯考與直升中都居劣勢，他們較多以申請或登記分發進入私立高中，成績較差，不過透過推甄進入公立高中的機會，並不低於高社經背景的學生。值得關注的是直升入學，家庭收入較高的學生，直升學費昂貴的私立名校來幫助其往後的升學，教育機會受社經背景的影響最明顯。而聯考也以高社經背景的學生占優勢，故回復聯考很可能仍難以降低教育機會不均等。
    Many people criticize students from rich family get much benefit of multiple entrance program and the educational opportunity is unequal so that some people suggest to return to the joint entrance examination. Nonetheless, is it true that the joint entrance examination is less influenced by social economic background and more accord with the equality of educational opportunity? It needs empirical data to evidence. This study analyzes the national samples from “Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS)” and the results are stated as follows: Students with higher social economic backgrounds have more opportunities to enter public and famous private senior high school in multiple entrance program than the lower ones. They have more opportunities to enter public senior high schools through the joint entrance examination and enter private famous senior high schools through the direct entry, and their grades in senior high school are better. Students with lower social economic backgrounds have few opportunities in those two ways, and many of them enter private senior high schools by application or admission and their grades in senior high school are lower, but the opportunity of entering public senior high schools through recommendation and screening is no less than students with higher social economic background. The direct entry is the most unequal way. Students from rich family can directly enter private expensive high schools that are beneficial to enter high-level college in the future. Therefore, the students with higher social economic backgrounds have more opportunities for the joint entrance examination, so return to the joint entrance examination may not probably reduce the inequality of educational opportunity.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 29(3),433-459
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2428View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback