English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50998233      Online Users : 866
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98169


    Title: 模糊理論在心理衡鑑上的應用:以認知風格分析為例
    Other Titles: Application of Fuzzy Theory in Psychology Assessment: An Example of Cognitive Style Analysis
    Authors: 羅豪章
    Keywords: 模糊理論 ; 認知風格 ; 認知風格分析 ; 衡鑑
    Fuzzy theory ; Cognitive style ; Cognitive style analysis ; Assessment
    Date: 2005-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-21 16:50:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Riding與Cheema(1991)所發展之認知風格分析(Cognitive Style Analysis, CSA)軟體,由於施測簡便,已被普遍用於認知風格的衡鑑工作。本研究旨在利用模糊理論,發展出改良CSA數值處理的模糊推論系統,並以44名國二學生為對象,團體藏圖測驗為效標,分析在傳統數值和模糊推論處理下認知風格衡鑑的結果,並將模糊推論結果的認知風格類型,與受測者的性別和學習成就進行關聯性的考驗。研究結果顯示,模糊推論所得結果和效標間存在較高的關聯性,表示以模糊推論系統搭配CSA原第二、第三分測驗,衡鑑個體的整體/分析認知風格,是適切可行的。同時,經本研究分析後發現:認知風格和性別與學習成就間,皆無顯著相關存在。對於後續研究工作,本文亦提出了若干建議。
    CSA, Cognitive Style Analysis, proposed by Riding and Cheema in 1991 has been used widely in assessing cognitive style for its convenience. This study aimed at developing alternative approach for CSA based on fuzzy theory. Forty-four 8-grades students were involved. Fuzzy and traditional approaches were discussed and Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) was employed. Besides, correlation was analyzed among cognitive style, sex and academic achievement. Results showed that fuzzy approach for CSA proposed in this study was suitable for assessing wholist-analytic cognitive style. Cognitive style was not significantly correlated with sex and the same result between cognitive style and academic achievement. Some suggestions were proposed for further research, too.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 28(3),527-549
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2358View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback