政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98160
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51036252      Online Users : 906
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98160


    Title: 幼稚園教師科學教具製作的創造思考研究
    Other Titles: The Creative Thinking of Early Childhood Teachers in Designing Science Learning Materials for Young Children
    Authors: 陳淑芳
    Keywords: 幼稚園教師 ; 創造思考 ; 科學信念 ; 科學教學 ; 教具製作
     Kindergarten teachers ; Creative thinking ; Science teaching ; Design of learning materials
    Date: 2005-06
    Issue Date: 2016-06-21 16:49:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究目的在了解科學教具的創造思考和創造表現，並探討影響教具創造表現的因素。以幼稚園教師和幼兒教育學系學生共26名為研究對象，分為即席教具創作和自然情境教具創作兩階段蒐集資料。資料來源包括現場和電話訪談、教師創作手記、書面創作說明和口頭報告。 本文僅先針對下列四個部分進行分析與討論：（1）參與教師的科學觀點和信念；（2）參與教師的創意經驗和對創造性人格特質的看法；（3）科學教具創作表現；（4）科學教具創作過程和影響因素。 結果發現幼稚園教師科學教具創作點子多來自於看見材料和現成教具；製作時多會考量使用者特性；製作目的多設定為提供幼兒試驗和發現的工具，較少以解釋科學原理為主；即席製作時多集中心力解決材料和製作技術問題；在自然情境中則多苦惱於沒時間和尋找主題。幼兒對教具喜愛程度和參與程度是教師用以判斷教具成效之依據。設計教具與設計玩法並重，且花在「創意玩法」的心力比花在「製作」本身多。科學知識的缺乏僅對少數教師形成困擾。最後提出對未來研究、提升幼稚園教師的創造力，以及改進幼稚園教師自製科學教具表現的建議。
    The purpose of this study is to extend the understanding of the creative process, factors that affect teachers` creative performance, and the effects of teacher knowledge on creativity. Twenty-six teachers at different professional development levels participate in this study. Data was collected in two sessions: (1) a quasi-experimental environment, and (2) teacher`s natural teaching/learning environments. Multiple methods used to collect data include Kelly`s Repertory Grid Techniques, semi-structured interviews, questionnaires and reflective journal writing. Finally, teachers` creative products were evaluated by peer teachers and the creators themselves. Data were analyzed to answer the following questions: What are the processes of creative thinking teachers involve when they design science learning materials? What are factors reported by participating teachers that prohibit creativity? What are factors reported by participating teachers as facilitators to creative performance? Suggestions for further studies, early childhood science education, and teacher education programs are made based on the findings of this study.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 28(2),219-239
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Education ＆ Psychology] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2460View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback