English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50794698      Online Users : 743
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98104


    Title: 從蒙特內哥羅獨立檢視歐盟的軟權力工具
    Other Titles: An Analysis on Enlargement as an Instrument of EU’s soft power in the case of Montenegro’s Independence
    Authors: 葉錦娟
    Yeh, Chin-Chuan
    Keywords: 歐洲聯盟;軟權力;擴大政策;蒙特內哥羅;塞爾維亞
    Enlargement;EU;Montenegro;Serbia;Soft power
    Date: 2008-07
    Issue Date: 2016-06-20 16:37:38 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 奈伊認為歐盟是美國軟權力的競爭對手。事實上,歐盟的軟權力比起美國的更為可靠,因為它擁有明確而強大的軟權力資源─擴大政策。歐盟第五次擴大成功地讓想要加入歐盟的中東歐國家,進行平和的政體轉變和經濟發展。擴大政策讓歐盟成為一塊磁鐵,吸引開發中的歐洲國家想要加入歐盟,以擠進先進國家之林。歐盟藉由擴大政策,從原本只是和計畫入盟國家進行的雙邊談判,進而開始運用這個軟權力干預其內部衝突,而蒙特內哥羅的獨立是其最鮮明而成功的例子。\\r蒙特內哥羅和塞爾維亞平和地分家,可說是歐盟利用其最強大的軟權力工具─擴大政策的結果使然。蒙特內哥羅從開始出現獨立聲音到付諸行動,歐盟鑑於過去的歷史經驗,一度擔心蒙特內哥羅的獨立會引發一場流血衝突,從而利用入盟進行干預,讓事前諸番揣測可能引發巴爾幹半島另一波的動盪並沒有發生,是前南斯拉夫各共和國唯一以合乎國際承認的民主標準程序完成獨立。本文將以奈伊的軟權力概念,探討為何擴大政策是歐盟最強大的軟權力,以及在蒙特內哥羅的獨立過程中,歐盟如何利用入盟的吸引力。文末將提出擴大政策做為軟權力工具的發展與限制。
    In Joseph Nye’s opinion, EU is the closest competitor to USA in soft power. In fact, EU’s soft power is more credible than that of the USA, this credibility owes to EU’s clear and powerful soft power resource: the Enlargement Policy. During the fifth enlargement, EU successfully made Central and East European Countries into ones that respect the principles of liberty, democracy, rule of law, human rights and fundamental freedoms. Since then, “Accession” has become the most important foreign policy in those European developing countries, attracting them to achieve compliance with EU’s criteria in hope of acquiring EU membership. In the case of Montenegro’s independence, EU intervened in the process with EU accession. The process of Montenegro’s independence was free, fair and democratic in full conformity with internationally recognized standards. This success was attributed to EU’s enlargement policy, the most powerful instrument of EU’s soft power. This paper will discuss the enlargement policy as EU’s soft power in Joseph Nye’s definition, and then analyzing how EU used the attraction of accession in the process of Montenegro’s independence, as well as discussing its development and limit.
    Relation: 國際關係學報, 26, 101-132
    Journal of international relations
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[國際關係學報] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    26(p101-132).pdf516KbAdobe PDF2321View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback