政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98047
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113648/144635 (79%)
造访人次 : 51570224      在线人数 : 723
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98047


    题名: 金融消費爭議評議決定與法院核可程序之研究
    作者: 王怡蘋
    Wang, Yi-Ping
    关键词: 金融消費者保護法;訴外紛爭解決途徑;金融消費爭議;金融消費評議;調解;評議決定;法院核可程序;公平合理原則;司法審查;金融消費訴訟替代機制
    Financial Consumer Protection Act;Out-of-Court Dispute Resolution;Financial Dispute;Financial Ombudsman Scheme;Mediation;Ombudsman’s Decision;Approval Process by Court;Fair and Reasonable Doctrine;Judicial Review;Financial Alternative Dispute Resolution (Financial ADR)
    日期: 2014-09
    上传时间: 2016-06-20 11:43:01 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 金融消費爭議事件之評議制度，乃於訴訟外由公正第三人循一定之爭議處理程序，依公平合理原則作成判斷，解決當事人間因金融商品或服務所生之民事紛爭。評議決定成立後，金融消費者得依金保法第三十條規定，申請將評議書送法院核可，俾取得與確定判決同一之效力。由於評議決定在個案上容許公平合理之判斷，且同時具有調解建議及準仲裁之性質，就此一特殊制度法院應採取何等密度之審查標準，實務上存在不同看法。本文藉由英國與我國之立法例、爭議處理程序及法院審查案例等比較研究，嘗試為我國法院核可程序之審查界線及操作基準提出具體建議，希能對我國金融消費紛爭解決替代機制之監督與功能促進有所助益。
    The Financial Ombudsman’s Scheme is a kind of out-of-court dispute resolution, which is decided by an independent party (ombudsman or a panel of ombudsmen) according to his/her fair and reasonable judgment and due process, to resolve private disputes regarding financial products or services. In order to make the ombudsman’s final decision have the same legal effect and to be enforceable like a judgment made by the court, the applicant (financial consumer) may ask that the decision be sent to court for approval under Article 30 of the Financial Consumer Protection Act. The ombudsman’s fair and reasonable judgment is on a one-off case basis. On one hand, it conveys a recommendation to the financial consumer for consideration; on the other hand, it is legally binding on the respondent (financial business) when the monetary award is no more than the maximum limitation laid by the Financial Ombudsman Institution. For such a concern, different points of view exist about what reviewing intensity should be adopted by the court when approving a financial ombudsman’s decision. By a comparative analysis of relevant regulations, the dispute handling process and judicial review cases between the British and R.O.C., this article introduces some practical standards and suggestions for the court’s operation, with the expectation to make further progress in overseeing and functioning financial alternative dispute resolutions as well.
    關聯: 法學評論, 138,71-179頁
    Chengchi law review
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    138(71-179).pdf1255KbAdobe PDF2502检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈