政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98042
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51002094      Online Users : 902
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98042


    Title: 美國德拉瓦法上股份收買請求權的計算方式與衍生問題
    Other Titles: Delaware`s Shareholder Appraisal Right: Calculation and Issues
    Authors: 林建中
    Lin, Chien-Chung
    Keywords: 股份收買請求權;現金流折現法;比較法;權重法;控制溢價;少數折扣;增生利益的分配
    Right of Appraisal;Discounted Cash Flow Method;Comparable Method;Delaware Block Method;Control Premium;Minority Discount;Merger-Created Value
    Date: 2014-06
    Issue Date: 2016-06-20 11:42:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以美國德拉瓦（Delaware）法為中心，探討公司法上反對股東股份收買請求權相關的實體與程序規定。其次，本文針對具體案例中，公平價格的計算方式，分別討論不同的計算公式背後所呈現出的歧異性與相互間如何調整的問題。最後，本文就股份收買請求權幾個備受爭議的概念性問題，予以分析：其中特別包括了價格的主觀與客觀、增生利益得否計入與控制溢價及少數折扣三組問題，並提供作者的觀察。
    This article discusses dissent shareholder’s appraisal right in the context of corporate law and several of its conceptual issues. Based on the legal framework developed in Delaware, this article provides a detailed account of the substantive and procedural rules concerning the right of appraisal, and analyzes the different formulas used by Delaware courts in history as well as their criticism. It then turns to three core issues surrounding the right of appraisal and its actual calculation: the legitimacy of using objective price, the inclusion of value created from merger for appraisal, and the control premium/minority discount dilemma. Lastly, the author compares Taiwan’s own rule and summarizes these debates with his own observations.
    Relation: 法學評論, 137,99-150頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    DOI link: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202014060137003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202014060137003
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    137(99-150).pdf1604KbAdobe PDF2406View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback