政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/98026
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113318/144297 (79%)
造访人次 : 51041834      在线人数 : 921
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98026


    题名: 遠距拍賣適用無條件後悔權之反省
    其它题名: Reflections on the Absolute Right to Withdraw from Online Bidding
    作者: 李淑如
    Lee, Shu-Ju
    关键词: 網路拍賣;後悔權之法理基礎;無條件撤回權;無條件解除權;拍賣價格制定機制;遠距契約;公開性拍賣
    Online Auction;Reasonable Cause for a Right to Repent;Absolute Right of Withdrawal;Distance Contract;Consumer Contract;Price-Setting Mechanism
    日期: 2013-06
    上传时间: 2016-06-20 10:48:52 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 在網路無國界的時代，消保法關於郵購買賣之「無條件解除權」法制面規範是否仍能因應世界潮流的適用，是值得探討的問題。本文首先說明消費者之無條件後悔權的法理基礎，其次，探討以遠距競價拍賣締結之契約，是否得直接適用消保法的郵購買賣，即應買人享有無條件後悔權。於此，爰參考歐盟與德國立法例，考量公開競價拍賣制度的特殊性，例外排除於無條件後悔權的適用。再者，討論遠距拍賣競價拍賣契約是否包括目前盛行的網路拍賣。本文就此也將以德國實務與學說之見解及實體價值判斷加以討論，並就目前使用網路拍賣於遠距契約適用之限制。最後，本文提出不同看法，認為使用遠距拍賣之法律適用應就個案為實質審查，並不當然直接享有消保法的保障，並希冀消保法第十九條以負面列表的方式，限制公開性拍賣的遠距契約，例外排除於其適用範圍。
    The obligation to provide pertinent information of the enterprise and the right of withdrawal of the consumer are parts of the traditional instruments of consumer protection for long-distance sales business. The discussion therefore begins with the purpose and task of the consumer protection right to withdraw and then devotes itself to its manifestations. Since the German legislature is of the opinion that a right of withdrawal would hamper strongly the use of auctions as a form of coordination and render an auction in the way of long-distance transactions impossible. In other words, according to § 312d Abs. 4 Nr. 5 BGB, there is no right of withdrawal in the contracts of long-distance transactions which were concluded in the form of auctions. The question is whether the § 312d Abs. 4 BGB contained exception provisions which excluded also online auctions from this right of withdrawal. The Federal Court of Justice of Germany (BGH) has ruled that the consumer is entitled to the right of withdrawal at the time of reaching agreement by means of such a time-auction. Unfortunately, in terms of content, such a judgment can hardly be considered satisfactory. Therefore, it is discussed to what extent consumers are entitled to a right of withdrawal in long-distance transactions. We then reflect upon the effectiveness of our consumer protection law.
    關聯: 法學評論, 133,73-132頁
    Chengchi law review
    数据类型: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202013060133002
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202013060133002
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 描述 大小格式浏览次数
    133-2.pdf983KbAdobe PDF2303检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈