English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 112881/143847 (78%)
Visitors : 50248583      Online Users : 523
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98021


    Title: 論Radbruch公式
    Other Titles: A Discussion on Radbruch`s Formula
    Authors: 黃忠正
    Huang, Chung-Cheng
    Keywords: Gustav Radbruch;Radbruch公式;制定法之不法;超越制定法 之法;正義
    Radbruch’s Formula;Statutory Lawlessness;Supra-Statutory;Justice
    Date: 2013-04
    Issue Date: 2016-06-20 09:52:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: Gustav Radbruch（一八七八年至一九四九年）是二十世紀最有影響力的法哲學家之一，他在一九四六年發表的「制定法之不法與超越制定法之法」一文被譽為二十世紀最具影響力的法哲學著作，該著作的核心思想被命名為「Radbruch公式」。Radbruch公式主張：在實證的制定法與正義相衝突時，如法官決定取實質正義而棄實證法律，必須實證的制定法或是「無法忍受的不正義」（無法忍受命題），或是「有意否認正義的核心平等」（否認命題）。在Radbruch公式中，法律安定性對於正義只是相對優先，它代表法律與道德相聯結的聯結命題。理論上，它是自然法與法實證主義對立中的一種調解；實務上，它被德國聯邦最高法院與德國聯邦憲法法院多次引用。對於此二十世紀最具影響力的法哲學著作，中文世界的專門研究可惜尚不多見。本文研究Radbruch公式並建議以人權為核心來具體化Radbruch公式的實質內涵。
    Gustav Radbruch (1878-1949) was one of the most influential law philosophers in the 20th century. His essay “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law,” published in 1946, is regarded as the most significant work in the philosophy of law. The core theory of the essay is named “Radbruch’s Formula.” Radbruch’s Formula argues that when statutory law is incompatible with justice “to an intolerable degree,” or when statutory law is obviously designed in a way that deliberately negates “the equality that is the core of all justice”, the judge must disregard statutory law in favor of the justice principle. According to Radbruch’s Formula, legal stability is superior to justice, but, only conditionally. It represents a necessary connection between law and morals. Theoretically, it is a solution for the conflict between Natural Law and Legal Positivism. In practice, the formula has been applied to numerous cases by the German Federal Constitutional Court and the Federal Court of Justice since its first publication in 1946. Nevertheless, in the Chinese-speaking world, very little research on this important work of legal philosophy has been carried out. My research aims to discuss the fundamental ideas of Radbruch’s Formula and suggests that we should exam it with respect to Human Rights.
    Relation: 法學評論, 132,115-162頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    DOI 連結: http://dx.doi.org/10.3966%2f102398202013040132003
    DOI: 10.3966/102398202013040132003
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    132-3.pdf933KbAdobe PDF2508View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback