English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50922669      Online Users : 945
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/98010


    Title: 美國控制股東「公平對待義務」之法制探源——兼論我國控制股東之濫權問題
    Other Titles: Exploring the American Legal Doctrine of the Controlling Shareholder`s Fiduciary Duty and Its Implications for Controlling Shareholders` Abuse of Power in Taiwan
    Authors: 章友馨
    Tsang, Yo-Shing
    Keywords: 控制股東;受託義務;受信義務;公平對待義務;完全公平審理原則;現金逐出式合併;控制權移轉;交易過程公平;價格公平
    Fiduciary Duty;Duty of Fair Dealing;Controlling Shareholders;Entire Fairness Principle;Freezeout;Transfer of Control;Fair Dealing;Fair Price;Safe Harbor
    Date: 2012-12
    Issue Date: 2016-06-17 16:43:39 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 有鑑於我國控制股東濫權問題普遍且公司法上對控制股東濫權行為約束之相關法制設計有限，美國法上控制股東對公司及少數股東之「受託義務」，為值得我國考慮是否應予移植之制度。惟美國法下控制股東「受託義務」之內涵隱晦，本研究從大量美國法案例中，依據公司形態、州法院不同審理標準，及不同時期受託義務審理原則，梳理美國控制股東之受託義務，並於一般營運型交易、現金逐出式合併、控制權移轉等代表性案例中，歸結出可免於使美國法院採取「完全公平原則」審查控制股東是否違反義務之「安全港」要件。從案例分析及美國重要法律文獻中，本研究發現控制股東「受託義務」意涵已發生轉變，傳統定義下之受託義務已不存在，以「公平對待義務」稱之更能表現其內涵，倘日後我國能移植「控制股東公平對待義務」，由控制股東負擔舉證「交易過程公平」與「價格公平」之責任，或能對控制股東濫權問題起到相當實際之約束作用。
    Abuse of power by controlling shareholders is seriously jeopardizing the quality of corporate governance in Taiwan. This problem is aggravated by the lack of effective legal mechanisms that hold controlling shareholders liable. To meet these challenges, it is well worth considering the American common law doctrine of controlling shareholders’“fiduciary duty” toward minority shareholders. However, the content of this common doctrine is highly elusive. This article seeks to shed light on its dynamic development by conducting a comprehensive critical literature review and case analysis into the contemporary understanding of controlling shareholders’ fiduciary duty. The investigation is carried out along the dimensions of type of corporation (closed v. public corporation), variation among state courts (centering on Massachusetts and Delaware), and historical evolution of the concept of fiduciary duty. I then investigate three types of cases, namely the ongoing operation of the company, freezeout and transfer of control, and summarize the “safe harbor” doctrine, which the courts have developed to avoid the “entire fairness principle.” I argue that the meaning of “fiduciary duty” of controlling shareholders has undergone material change. “duty of fair dealing” has become a better concept than “fiduciary duty” in terms of accuracy and adequacy. Under the “Duty of fair dealing,” controlling shareholders should operate under the principle of “proportional distribution of benefits according to shareholding ratio,” and should pay due attention to fairness in both transactional procedures and price-setting. This renewed understanding of the American law will offer a significant point of reference for comparative corporate law in Taiwan regarding the issue of controlling shareholders’ fiduciary duty.
    Relation: 法學評論, 130,51-158頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    130-2.pdf1500KbAdobe PDF2341View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback