English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51574498      Online Users : 935
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97992


    Title: 訴訟標的概念與重複起訴禁止原則——從德國法對訴訟標的概念的反省談起
    Other Titles: The Concept of the Subject Matter of the Litigation and the Rule of Lis Pendens: Rethinking the Concept of the Subject Matter of the Litigation under German Civil Procedure Law
    Authors: 陳瑋佑
    Chen, Wei-Yu
    Keywords: 訴訟標的概念;重複起訴禁止原則;歐洲法院;核心理論;程序集中化義務
    Concept of Subject Matter of the Litigation;Rule of Lis Pendens;European Court of Justice;Subject-Matter Theory;Obligation of Concentration of Procedures
    Date: 2012-06
    Issue Date: 2016-06-17 12:00:44 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 在德國民事訴訟法上，訴訟標的是一個核心的概念，藉由此概念體系的建構，關於訴之客觀合併、訴之變更、重複起訴禁止原則或既判力客觀範圍等訴訟制度可以一貫、穩定的運作。一併繼受德國訴訟標的概念的我國，向來以訴訟標的是否同一作為判斷民事訴訟法第二五三條之重要標準。然而，受限於訴訟標的概念架構，德國民事訴訟法第二六一條第三項第一款並無法充分發揮機能。相對於此，歐洲法院賦予歐洲管轄及執行公約第二十一條獨自的意義，創造核心理論以合理劃定禁止重複起訴規範的適用範圍，明確地不採德國訴訟標的概念。於德國學者深切反省其訴訟標的概念的同時，歷經世紀變革的我國民事訴訟法學亦有主張重複起訴禁止原則擴大論者。以此為契機，本文擬一面引介相關討論，一面指出我國訴訟標的概念與重複起訴禁止原則適用間應有之走向。
    The “subject matter of the litigation” is a central concept in German civil procedure law. As a result of the construction of this systemic concept many procedural institutions should be steadily and consistently implemented, especially the rule of lis pendens. During the reception of German procedure law this concept wass also inserted both in Taiwan’s code of civil procedure and its procedural theories, while it has been proven that this concept is not adequate to let the rule of lis pendens function well. As opposed to the German model, the European Court of Justice interpreted Article 21 of the Convention on Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters autonomously and teleologically. In response to this approach the Court created the so-called “subject-matter theory” and expressly rejected the German concept. It is therefore an urgent concern for German jurists to reexamine their tradition-based concept of subject matter of the litigation. At the same time it is advocated that the scope of lis pendens should be broadened in light of the centurial reform of Taiwanese procedure law. Inspired by these developments, this thesis intends firstly to present related discussions and secondly to point out the way which should be taken to correctly explain the relationship between the concept of subject matter of the litigation and the rule of lis pendens.
    Relation: 法學評論, 127,1-51頁
    Chengchi law review
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    127(001-051).pdf912KbAdobe PDF2574View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback