English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50801529      Online Users : 643
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97869


    Title: Faculty Attitude towards Student Ratings: Do the Resultant Ratings Scores Matter?
    Other Titles: 不同評鑑結果之教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度之比較
    Authors: 張德勝
    Keywords: 學生評鑑教師教學 ; 大學教師評鑑 ; 評鑑分數 ; 態度
    Student ratings of instruction ; Faculty evaluation ; Evaluation scores ; Attitude
    Date: 2003-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-13 11:11:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究主要的目的在比較「學生評鑑教師教學」結果得高分的教師與得低分的教師對於「學生評鑑教師教學」的態度。研究對象為八十八學年度第二學期國立花蓮師範學院七十位教師。研究工具有兩種，第一種是教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」態度的調查問卷（the Attitude towards Student Ratings of Instruction Questionnaire, ASRI），主要是了解教師對「學生評鑑教師教學」的看法；另一種工具是「國立花蓮師範學院教學意見反映調查表」（the student Ratings of Instruction form， SRI），主要是了解學生對教師教學的滿意度。 研究結果顯示，高分教師在評鑑目的（教師升等參考）與評鑑結果應用（教學獎勵、約聘、升等、學生選課、公佈在學校刊物）兩方面顯著高於低分教師；而在負面影響方面（好的教學未必得高分、教師會降低要求）則顯著低於低分教師。另外，在評鑑關注及評鑑所應包含的內容兩分面，兩組教師則無顯著差異。
    The purpose of this study has been to investigate the attitude of college educators towards student ratings as a functions of the scores that individual faculty members actually receive in those ratings. The sample consisted of 70 faculty members at National Hualien Teachers College. The Attitude towards Student Ratings of Instruction Questionnaire and the Student Ratings of Instruction form (SRI), applied in the study. Along with many points of agreement, the results indicate some quite statistically significant difference in perceptions of the faculty who, were divided into two groups: those receiving high scores in the rating and those receiving low scores. The areas of concern where the two groups are significantly different include one item from “the purposes”, two items from “the negative effects”, and five items from ”the applications of student ratings”. There is no statistical mean difference on the “ concerns about student ratings” and the “components of student ratings”. The high-ratings faculty members show more agreement with the use of student ratings in providing references for faculty promotion. The high-rated faculty members are discovered to feel more positive about the applications of student ratings as input for personnel decisions such as teaching awards, job contracts, and promotions. Also, they are more positive towards using student ratings as information to assist students in their selection of courses and instructors and for publication in school journals.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 26(3),385-405
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML21026View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2973View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback