English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50937435      Online Users : 959
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97660


    Title: 驗證性因素分析於瞭解生涯承諾構念效度性的應用
    Other Titles: An Application of Confirmatory Factor Analysis to Examine the Construct Validity of Career Commitment
    Authors: 黃瓊蓉
    Keywords: 驗證性因素分析 ; 生涯承諾 ; 構念效度
    Confirmatory factor analysis ; Career commitment ; Construct validity
    Date: 1998-12
    Issue Date: 2016-06-04 15:04:31 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 教師承諾可包括教師對生涯、組織與職務等對象之投入狀態，在這些承諾對象中 ，以生涯承諾的定義最為模糊且分歧。所以本研究的目的在運用驗證性因素分析，探討生涯 承諾的構念效度。本研究以 London(1983) 的理論為基礎，研究發現多層面斜交模式與資料 的適配最好，顯示生涯承諾應是多向度的概念，且構成生涯承諾的組成分間有相關存在。而 多層面直交模式與資料的適配不佳，可見將生涯承諾的組成分視為不相關的概念，是不恰當 的假設。因此研究者若使用因素分析，以瞭解生涯承諾的構念效度，不宜選擇直交的因素模 式。例如因素分析中的主成分分析的因素萃取法，即設定各因素間的關係是直交的。此類直 交因素結構，如繼而實施直交轉軸，各因素間的關係仍是獨立的。因為此類直交因素模式無 法適當的代表生涯承諾的構念，不宜選用。而斜交模式較能代表生涯承諾的構念，應成為研 究者的主要選用模式。
    Teacher commitment involves organizational, career, job commit ement, and soon. Among these components, the definition of career commitment is the most ambiguous. The purpose of this inquiry is to examine the construct validity of career commitment using confirmatory factor analysis. London`s (1983) model was used as the major framework of this investigation. According to the index of goodness of fit, the obliquefactor model is the best representation of data, while performance of the orthogonalfactor model is poor. These findings indicate that correlation between components of career commitment cannot be ignored. Hence, principal factor analysis followed by an orthogonal rotation such as VARIMAX, QUARTIMAX, EQUIMAX, is not recommended for understanding the construct validity of career commitment.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 21(下),199-220
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2522View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2402View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback