政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/97644
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51583136      Online Users : 1020
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97644


    Title: A Comparative Analysis of Alternative Evaluation Approaches
    Other Titles: 評量方法之分析比較
    Authors: 尚惠芳
    Keywords: 過程評量法 ; 全面性評量法 ; 非正式主觀評量法
    Judgmental model ; Decision-facilitation model ; Naturalistic model
    Date: 1997-12
    Issue Date: 2016-06-04 14:44:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本篇論文旨在探討與比較現行的幾種評量方法。文中將一一分析過程評量法 (Judgmental Model)，全面性評量法 (Decision-Facilitation Model)，及非正式主觀評量 法 (Naturalistic Model) 之基本理論及其優缺點。 比較結果顯示，全面性評量法 (Decision-Facilitation Model) 最能夠提供教師及校方主管人員對整個教學與校務發展流 程，有一個清晰明確的架構，以作為改進的依據。
    The purpose of this paper is to make a thorough study of three alternative evaluation models which are the judgmental model, the decision-facilitation model, and the naturalistic model. Scriven`s goal-free evaluation approach, Stufflebeam`s CIPP model, and Stake`s responsive evaluation approach will be selected and presented from those alternative evaluation models, respectively. The rationale, strengths, and weaknesses of those three evaluation approaches will be compared and analyzed. By comparison, Stufflebeam`s CIPP model is the most useful and helpful evaluation approach in providing program directors and teachers with a clear record-keeping framework regarding how the school program is going.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 20(下),203-215
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Education ＆ Psychology] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML21117View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML21172View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback