English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51031360      Online Users : 910
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97605


    Title: 我國高等教育表現指標現況之實證分析
    Authors: 王保進 
    Keywords: 指標 ; 高等教育
    Date: 1994-09
    Issue Date: 2016-06-04 13:59:32 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究之目的旨在對我國高等教育的表現指標的現況進行實証之分析，以瞭解現 有表現指標之實際效用。最後，本研究根據分析結果，做為建立與改進我國高等教育表現指 標之參考，並同時提出對大學院校辦學與行政管理之建議。 本研究在實證分析時，係依據王保進（民 82 ）所提出之我國高等教育表現指標可行的整合 模式為參照，以教育部二次「公私立大學中程校務發展計畫」之調查資料，及國家科學委員 會出版之研究獎助摘要為研究資料，整理可用之高等教育表現指標，以為對現況實證分析之 用。實證分析所使用之統計方法包括多元迴歸分析、主成份分析、集群分析、區別分析、及 單因子變異數分析等方法。 研究結果之主要發現如下：（一）我國建立高等教育表現指標的現況，仍屬於草創階段，且 有五項重大缺失待改進；（二）除了行政部門之政策或措施外，學術界有關我國高等教育表 現指標的相關研究，多集中在教師研究出產力之分析，且多以獲國科會研究獎助及專題研究 計畫人數為教師出產力指標；（三）我國現有之高等教育表現指標間具有密切的關係，並可 以有效區分出各大學不同的表現類型。 根據研究結果，本研究提出對改進我國高等教育表現指標之建議，並分別對大學之行政管理 及辦學提出建議。
    The purposes of this study were: (1)to verify the validity of performance indicators in higher education, (2)to apply appropriate indicators in higher education, and (3)to propose a practical performance indicators model in higher education of Taiwan. The empirical analysis of this study was based on Wang(1993). Data were collected from the investigation reports of the Universities Middle-term Strategy Program, which was published by the Ministry of Education, and Publications of the National Science Council. To accomplish the above purposes, multiple regression, principal component anlaysis, cluster analysis, discriminant analysis, and ANOVA were used to analyze the relationships among them. The major findings of this paper are as follows: 1. There were five shortcomings in the establishment of Taiwan`s Performance Indicators model in higher Education. 2. Except for the policies or execution of administration department, academic research merely focused on the analysis of performance indicators for teachers` research productivity. 3. There is close relationship among the performance indicators in the model in higher education, and the existing performance indicators can discriminate among the different types of the accountability for Taiwan`s universities. According to these findings the author postulated some suggestions for managing the universities and improving the performance indicators model in higher education of Taiwan.
    Relation: 教育與心理研究, 17,61-98
    Journal of Education & Psychology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[教育與心理研究 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2250View/Open
    index.html0KbHTML2378View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback