English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50803449      Online Users : 522
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97357


    Title: 從李材案看晚明清議的形成及其與講學之關係
    Other Titles: The Making of Public Opinion and Discussion of Learning by Confucian Scholars in the Late Ming Dynasty: The Legal Case of Li Cai
    Authors: 劉勇
    Liu, Yong
    Keywords: 明神宗;李材;講學;清議;明代政治史
    Shenzong Emperor;Li Cai;Discussion of Learning;Public Opinion;The Political History of Ming Dynasty
    Date: 2009-11
    Issue Date: 2016-06-02 15:33:35 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文以明代萬曆前期李材涉嫌虛報戰功案的審理過程為線索，探討士人群體在面對皇帝「獨斷」意見時發揮清議力量的運作機制。士人對影響李材案的審理進程所採取的輿論導向，成功地阻止了明神宗對李材案獨斷處置決定的執行。從中可以看出，晚明士人有意識地運用朝野清議對君權形成制約力量，而發動群體力量以引導輿論的方式，與當時逐漸強化的政治壁壘、言官力量和黨社鬥爭幾乎完全同步。士人清議的產生、維繫與表達途徑是多元的，而盛行於晚明時期的理學講學活動發揮了重要作用。
    In a Ming dynasty court that operated mainly through ceremonial protocol, dynastic law and written communication how did the emperor and his officials communicate when there was a difference of opinion? The emperor was the ruler; if his absolute rule or power was not accordant with the law, how did the literati understand their role and determine which facet was paramount in a given situation? This paper examines the inherent tensions in the polygonal relationship of the emperor, grand secretary, ministers, judges, supervisors, local officials and intellectuals, as well as the political maneuvers that occurred during the legal case of Li Cai (1529-1607) in the Wanli period (1573-1620). In the case of Li, cooperation and struggle between the Shenzong emperor and literati, as well as among the literati themselves resulted in strained relations. By focusing on the opinions and actions of the literati, this paper shows how the literati expressed their collective will.
    Relation: 政治大學歷史學報, 32, 41-70
    The Journal of History
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政治大學歷史學報 THCI Core ] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    32-2(p.41-70).pdf751KbAdobe PDF2472View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback