English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50997476      Online Users : 829
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 學術期刊 > 會計評論 > 期刊論文 >  Item 140.119/97129


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97129


    Title: 會計師事務所規模、品牌與競爭程度對審計公費之影響：中國之實證
    Other Titles: Auditor Size, Brand Name Reputation, Market Competition and Audit Fees: Evidence from China
    Authors: 林嬋娟;林孝倫
    Lin, Chan-Jane;Lin, Hsiao-Lun
    Keywords: 審計公費;會計師事務所規模;會計師事務所品牌聲譽;國有企業
    Audit fees;Auditor size;Brand name reputation;State-owned enterprise
    Date: 2009-07
    Issue Date: 2016-06-01 14:06:11 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 中國資本市場無疑是近年來成長最快速的市場，會計師在其中扮演的角色也逐漸引起各方重視。在西方國家，Big 4同時也是規模最大、歷史最悠久，最具品牌聲譽的會計師事務所，在許多資本市場中，具有壟斷簽證業務的地位。但在中國，審計市場發展時間短暫，會計師事務所數量眾多，規模較小，Big 4在上市公司審計業務的市場佔有率並不高，部分省（市）中卻有審計業務高度集中於某一本土會計師事務所的情形，這些中國審計市場的特色，提供一個完整檢視審計訂價理論的機會。\\r 本文利用2002至2007年中國A股上市公司所揭露之6,657筆審計公費資訊，分析會計師事務所規模、品牌、競爭程度對於審計公費的影響。實證結果印證過去文獻對於會計師事務所特性與審計公費關係的推論，無論是事務所之規模、品牌或市場佔有率對於審計公費都存在顯著正向影響。本文亦發現，在中國市場中，除了Big 4結盟所外，規模較小的事務所也可以藉由與其他國際知名會計師事務所結盟，取得公費溢酬；而不同品牌對審計公費的影響存在差異，與Big 4結盟的會計師事務所，比其他國際會計師事務所之成員所可以收取更高的審計公費。最後，本文分析會計師事務所對於中國國有上市公司審計業務之訂價策略，實證結果顯示，事務所對國有企業收取較低之審計公費，且Big 4相較於其他會計師事務所對國有企業之審計收費，有顯著降低的情形。
    This study examines the determinants of audit fees in China and focuses on whether audit pricing is affected by auditor size, auditor brand name reputation, and market competition individually. The special characteristics of audit market in China, including that Big 4 auditors are not the largest auditors, neither Big 4 auditors nor other audit firms have taken a leading position in public audit market, provide an opportunity to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the fees determination. Based on the data for firms listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges from 2002 to 2007, we find that larger auditors (measured by assets audited by audit firm and total revenues of the audit firm) tend to charge higher audit fees. In addition, the results indicate that brand name fees premium exists for clients audited by both Big 4 and auditors affiliated with other international accounting firms. We also find that the regional leading auditor can earn fees premium. At last, the analyses show that auditors charge lower audit fees to state-owned clients, and Big 4 relatively offer more discount in order to earn more business potential in the future.
    Relation: 會計評論, 49,35-72頁
    International Journal of Accounting Studies
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[會計評論] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    49-2(p.35-72).pdf426KbAdobe PDF2550View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback