政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/97048
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51020616      Online Users : 948
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/97048


    Title: 「知道」與「認為」的語義語用分析和句法行為解釋
    Other Titles: The Semantic and Pragmatic Interpretation of the Differences between Syntactic Characteristics of ZHIDAO and RENWEI
    Authors: 張家驊
    Zhang, Jiahua
    Keywords: 預設;命題;敘實謂詞;主位;述位
    presupposition;proposition;active predicate;rhyme;theme
    Date: 2010-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-31 15:26:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 「知道」和「認為」是表達認知模態的基本命題態度謂詞。「知道」在辭彙語義結構中不僅包含（1）『認知狀態主體在其意識中有命題P』，而且包含（2）『P的所指在現實世界裏是有的』成分，在語用方面主要充當句子交際結構的述位元。「認為」只表示成分（1），不含成分（2），在句子的交際結構中大多充當主位元的成分。兩個謂詞的句子交際結構位置、所支配命題的表達手段和替代方式、疑問標記、與否定詞的意義關係、修飾語類型以及能否構成主位對比疑問句等方面，有一系列對立的表現，這些句法差異都可以從它們的辭彙語義、語用特徵中求得解釋。
    ZHIDAO and RENWEI are both basic predicates of propositional attitude, expressing the epistemic modality. In the semantic structure, ZHIDAO expresses not only a) that the epistemic subject has the proposition P in his mind, but also b) what P refers to exists in the reality. ZHIDAO acts as the rhyme in the communicative structure pragmatically. RENWEI, on the other hand, expresses only a), but not b). RENWEI usually acts as the theme in the communicative structure. These two predicates demonstrate contrasting behaviors in word order of the communicative structure, in the expressing means and referential method of subordinate proposition, in the interrogative marker, in the object of negation, in the types of modifiers, as well as in the possibility of forming the theme-only interrogation. The interpretation of these different syntactic behaviors of the two predicates can be obtained through the analysis of their lexico-semantic and pragmatic characteristics.
    Relation: 俄語學報,17,1-26
    Journal of Russian Philology
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Russian Philology] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    17(p1-26).pdf489KbAdobe PDF2564View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback