English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50927175      Online Users : 919
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96786


    Title: 由美國股東提案權制度談兩岸股東提案權制度之缺失
    Other Titles: Discussion of the Deficiencies of the Structure of Shareholder Proposals across the Taiwan Strait with Reference to the Experience of USA Shareholder Proposals System
    Authors: 趙德樞
    Chao, De-Su
    Keywords: 股份有限公司;股份;股東會;董事會;股東提案權制度;適當議題;委託書;章程;次級房貸;企業所有與經營分離原則
    Shareholder Proposals;State-owned Enterprise;Board of Directors;Shareholder;Company Limited by Share;Limited Company;Shareholder Meeting;Board of Supervisors;Proper Subject;the Campaign to Make General Motors Responsible;Supporting Statement;Reform and Open Policy;the Enterprise Legal Person
    Date: 2010-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 16:03:28 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 股東提案權制度係為鼓勵股東在一定規則限制下，得以向股東會提出議案方式，參與公司業務經營之公司經營民主化制度。此制度創立目的主要係為制衡由於近世股份有限公司規模日趨龐大，導致股權極度分散，經營權因而日益集中甚至發展成獨霸經營權趨勢之董事會。我國與大陸均係於二○○五年修訂公司法時採行此制度，美國則早自一九四二年起即正式制訂相關法規採行該制。與已施行該制度達六十餘年，其間經過多次修法之美國相較，我國與大陸公司法中之相關規定，實存有相當多有待改進之缺失。
    The shareholder proposals structure is designed to encourage shareholders to participate in democratizing a firm’s management by means of submitting proposals to the shareholder committee under some specific regulations. The goal of this system is to check and balance the monopolizing board of directors from the gradual concentration of managerial power at the expense of the extreme dispersion of shareholders due to the expansion of limited companies at the present time. Taiwan and China adopted this system in their most recent modification of industry laws in 2005. Such a system has been formally in effect in the USA since 1942 with related regulations. Compared to the USA’s structure, with more than 60 years of experience and development, there is room to improve for both Taiwan’s and China’s industry laws.
    Relation: 法學評論, 118, 227-269
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    118(227-269).pdf724KbAdobe PDF2323View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback