政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96785
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51056754      Online Users : 972
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96785


    Title: 論國民參與刑事審判制度之第二審上訴制度構造-以日本裁判員法及我國國民參審試行條例草案為對象
    Other Titles: The structure of second instance those trials held in civil court in the first instance:Focus on the act of Referee in Japan and the regulation of Civil Trail in Taiwan
    Authors: 張永宏
    Chang, Yong-Hong
    Keywords: 國民參審;上訴;覆審;續審;事後審;直接審理原則;裁判員法;國民參審試行條例;第二審
    Civil Trial;Appeal;Trial de Novo;Continuative Trial by Higher Tribunal;The Reviewing Court system;the Principle of Direct Trial;the Act of Referee;the Regulation of Civil Trial;Second Instance
    Date: 2010-02
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 15:37:57 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 現行刑事第二審上訴制度多年來屢見改革呼聲，其中有主張改為事後審制者，我國國民參審試行條例草案以此為據，擬定在第一審刑事審判行國民參審者，第二審改採事後審制，此一改革非但在國民參審制度下有探討之必要，亦可供日後修正刑事上訴制度之參考；又根據直接審理原則及國民參審制度下第二審得以撤銷原審判決之正當性依據，逐一檢視覆審制、續審制、事後審制並斟酌其利弊得失後，法律審兼事實審之事後審制確可平衡追求上訴制度及國民參審制度之目的，值得贊成，日本裁判員法立法過程中雖然亦採此一見解，但因日本刑事上訴制度實際運作結果已非正統事後審制，故抄襲日本現有規定，無法達成事後審制之要求，而仍應本於事後審制之精神，於法制上進行相關修正。
    The voices of reform of the current second instance of the criminal trial system is a common occurrence; among the voices some address the reviewing court system. The regulation of Civil Trial in this country according to those opinions legislate those trials held in civil court in the first instance will be tried by reviewing court in the second instance. But this reform not only must be conferred in the case of civil trial, but also in the case of the reform of the criminal appeals system in the future. According to the principle of direct trial and the propriety of reversing the first instance judgment from the civil court by the second instance court, a survey the reviewing court system, continuative trial system and trial de novo, and considering the advantages and disadvantages of these systems, I approve of the reviewing court system, because this system can retain a balance between the criminal appeal system and civil system. In addition, the legislation of the act of Referee in Japan also adopts a similar system, but actually the operating of the criminal appeal system in Japan is no longer a legitimate reviewing court system. Plagiarizing the regulations of Japan will not obtain the request of the reviewing court system. On the contrary, we should amend the regulations with the spirit of the reviewing court system.
    Relation: 法學評論, 113, 83-183
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    113(083-183).pdf926KbAdobe PDF2751View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback