政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96778
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51581774      Online Users : 1010
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96778


    Title: WTO服務貿易國內規章有關問題之探討
    Other Titles: Domestic Regulation and Service Trade in WTO
    Authors: 張新平
    Chang, Shin-pyng
    Keywords: 世界貿易組織;服務貿易總協定;國內規章;必要性;公開化
    Date: 2009-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 15:36:25 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文擬針對國內規章所生上述爭議問題提出探討。首先開宗明義界定GATS國內規章之意義,其次探究GATS規範國內規章之目的,接下來解析GATS第六條各項規定之意涵,最後探討在研擬國內規章準則時所產生之各項爭議問題,期能釐清國內規章及其準則談判時產生之疑義。
    The domestic regulation contained in Article 6 of GATS and its developments have been accompanied by a growing public debate about their substantive nature, benefits and detriments, which include, inter alia, the definition, scope, and purpose of domestic regulation, and some ambiguous comments, such as “Article 6 is being strengthened with the aim of requiring Members to show that they are employing least trade-restrictive policies. The legal tests under consideration would outlaw the use of non-market mechanisms such as cross-subsidization, universal risk pooling, solidarity, and public accountability in the de-sign, funding and delivery of public services as being anti-competitive and restrictive to trade.”\\r This paper discusses and analyses the legal dimension of domestic regulation. The first four sections analyze the definition, scope and pur-poses of domestic regulation. The fifth section discusses controversial issues involved in developing Disciplines on Domestic Regulation. This paper also aims to stimulate academic debate and clarify some ambi-guous concepts.
    Relation: 法學評論, 112, 137-199
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Chengchi law review ] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    112(137-199).pdf794KbAdobe PDF2994View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback