English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50799453      Online Users : 739
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96764


    Title: 我國勞動訴訟之實證研究──以第一審訴訟之審理與終結情形為中心（下）
    Other Titles: An Empirical Study on Labor Litigation in Taiwan: With Focus on the Adjudication Process and Case Outcome in the Trial Court (2)
    Authors: 黃國昌
    Huang, Kuo-Chang
    Keywords: 勞動訴訟;法律實證研究;勝訴率;上訴率;案件審理時間
    Date: 2009-02
    Issue Date: 2016-05-20 15:06:20 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本文旨在針對我國勞動訴訟踐行「實證研究」，考察全國第一審民事法院於一九九六年至二○○六年關於審理勞工案件之表現。本文所採取之實證考察視野，除了在究明我國勞動訴訟之運作現況外，亦將關懷之重心置於三個主要問題意識。首先，勞工在訴訟中所受之處遇為何？其次，勞動訴訟與一般普通財產權訴訟相較，在數個重要之觀察指標上，是否呈現特殊之現象？最後，我國目前所設置「勞工專庭」之具體成效如何？本文發現，法院對勞動訴訟之審理，並未較普通財產權訴訟之審理更為冗長。勞工請求給付之勝訴率，與一般請求金錢給付之訴之原告勝訴率相較，亦未出現偏低之問題。不過，勞工對於其在第一審所受之敗訴判決，卻提出甚多欠缺實益之上訴。最為顯著的發現係，設有勞工專庭之法院，不論係在「案件審理時間」、「上訴率」或「上訴維持率」等指標上，其表現均未優於未設有勞工專庭之法院。筆者認為我國現行「勞工專庭」的具體落實程度，有全面檢討之必要。本文期待能藉由此實證研究之踐行，發掘勞動訴訟在我國民事審判機制下之運作實況，並藉此提供我國關心勞動審判機制之論者，於開展其相關論述時之實證基礎，以進一步提升我國關於設置特別勞動審判制度必要性之論述深度，作為研議未來可能改革方向之參酌。
    This article reports the results of an independent empirical legal study on labor litigation in Taiwan. In addition to clarifying the litigation realities concerning labor disputes, this article examines this subject from three perspectives. First, how do laborers fare in the litigation process? Second, is labor litigation different from ordinary civil litigation, in terms of adjudication process as well as case outcome? Third, do the courts with “specialized labor judges” perform better than the courts without? After analyzing the data on all labor cases terminated from 1996 to 2006, this study finds that labor-plaintiffs obtain many more victories than employer-defendants in trial court while the losing labor-plaintiffs file more frivolous appeals. This study also shows that labor litigation proceeds at a slightly speedier pace than ordinary civil litigation, contrary to what some commentators have alleged. Most significantly, the courts with specialized labor judges do not perform better than the courts without such judges, either in terms of the time needed for case disposition, the percentage of appeals taken from their judgments, or the likelihood that their judgments are affirmed by the appellate courts. This result indicates that the device of establishing specialized labor judges does not realize its intended purpose in actual practices. This article argues that the current debate on the desirability of establishing an independent labor court system should take the litigation realties into consideration rather than simply implanting foreign devices.
    Relation: 法學評論, 107, 165-228
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    107(165-228).pdf832KbAdobe PDF2514View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback