政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96751
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文笔数/总笔数 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造访人次 : 50800801      在线人数 : 847
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜寻范围 查询小技巧：
  • 您可在西文检索词汇前后加上"双引号"，以获取较精准的检索结果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜寻，建议至进阶搜寻限定作者字段，可获得较完整数据
    •  进阶搜寻


    请使用永久网址来引用或连结此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96751


    题名: 概括故意與結果延後發生
    其它题名: Dolus Generalis and Delayed Outcome
    作者: 徐育安
    Hsu, Yu-An
    关键词: 概括故意;結果延後發生;因果歷程錯誤
    Dolus Generalis;Delayed Outcome;Causal Error
    日期: 2010-06
    上传时间: 2016-05-20 14:17:55 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 結果延後發生涉及的是，侵害結果實際的發生時間晚於行為人原先所預計者，因此屬於一種因果歷程錯誤類型，自von Weber於一八二五年提出概括故意（dolus generalis）之解決方案後，在文獻上多被稱為概括故意之案型。此種案例在刑法上應如何評價，後續各方意見的思辯爭執到現在紛陳而精采，其論爭的興起與流變正是一部「概括故意」的概念史，解決問題的建議方案可以大體歸類為，行為理論、因果理論及相當理論三種，其後逐漸興盛的客觀歸責理論又提供了一個解決方案的切入角度。\\r 本文之主要目的，在於釐清這僵持不下的局面從何而來，藉此評析探討各種學說意見之創見與疑義，並試圖提出己見。首先，本文以國內實務與學說的現況作為討論的出發點，剖析問題核心之所在。接著，探討概括故意這個概念的出現及其所引發的爭論，以追本溯源釐清爭議的來龍去脈。其後，本文將焦點轉移至概括故意理論被放棄之後，德國新興學說的各家爭鳴，藉著對於不同學說的整理與評析，逐一梳理不同解決方案的思考脈絡，比較其中得失，並於最後對於本問題提出淺見，作為學界與實務界之參考。
    The so-called “delayed outcome” in the context of German criminal law refers to the situation in which an outcome resulting from a committed crime takes place later than expected by the criminal. Therefore, the delayed outcome not only belongs to the category of causal errors in light of academic debates, but also serves as a typical case of the so-called dolus generalis, which was advocated and developed by von Weber in 1825. Due to its significance for the theoretical and practical developments of dolus generalis, the problematic of delayed outcome has triggered numerous controversies and discussions, which has then resulted in the categorization of different theories of intention. Moreover, the development of the so-called objective imputation can also be traced back to the debates on the delayed outcome. In view of the endless controversies thus far engendered, this essay intends to undertake a comprehensive review of the historical, theoretical as well as practical developments of the “delayed outcome” and in this way tries to figure out how the cases of delayed outcome should be analyzed and resolved in criminal law. In addition to a comparative and a dogmatic study of German criminal law theory, especially of the development of dolus generalis, this essay also attempts to critically examine the related discussions on “delayed outcome” in Taiwan so as to provide some constructive suggestions to the Taiwanese theoretical and practical developments.
    關聯: 法學評論, 115, 55-113
    数据类型: article
    显示于类别:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的档案:

    档案 大小格式浏览次数
    115(055-113).pdf754KbAdobe PDF22965检视/开启


    在政大典藏中所有的数据项都受到原著作权保护.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回馈