|
English
|
正體中文
|
简体中文
|
Post-Print筆數 : 27 |
Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50927338
Online Users : 911
|
|
|
Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96748
|
Title: | 美國與日本不當勞動行為裁決機制之研究 |
Other Titles: | A study of relief for unfair labor practices: Lessons from U.S.A. and Japan |
Authors: | 侯岳宏 Hou, Yueh-Hung |
Keywords: | 不當勞動行為;勞動委員會;團體協約法;工會法;勞資爭議處理法;裁決制度 Unfair Labor Practices;Labor Relations Commission;Collective Agreements Act;Labor Union Act;Settlement of Labor Disputes Act;Labor Dispute;Trade Union |
Date: | 2010-04 |
Issue Date: | 2016-05-20 14:17:11 (UTC+8) |
Abstract: | 在台灣,勞工籌組工會、會務運作、與雇主協商等行為,常遭雇主降調、減薪甚至解僱等不當勞動行為對待,而現行工會法、團體協約法與勞資爭議處理法等攸關集體勞資關係的勞動三法,並不能夠有效保護勞工或工會,並迅速、妥善且有效的解決紛爭。因此,行政院勞工委員會近年來提出勞動三法修正草案,積極推動不當勞動行為制度的立法。在工會法修正草案及新修正的團體協約法裡明文規定不當勞動行為的禁止規範,並且在勞資爭議處理法草案裡增訂處理不當勞動行為事件之裁決機制。\\r本文,首先,對於不當勞動行為的勞資糾紛在台灣現行法制度下是由何種規定及程序來處理,以及這些相關規定及程序在理論上有何問題點加以檢討。其次,透過美國與日本的不當勞動行為制度的考察比較,檢討目前行政院所提出相關草案之問題點,並提出建議,以作為我國修法檢討導入此制度時之參考。 The issue of labor disputes, particularly unfair labor practices, has become a real challenge to the government of Taiwan. Under the Labor Union Act, employers are prohibited from refusing to hire, dismiss, or otherwise unfairly treat workers because they are labor union members. However, employers have in practice sometimes dismissed labor union leaders without reasonable cause or laid them off under the guise of employee cutbacks, and observers have pointed out that the law has no specific penalties for such violations. In addition, the Collective Agreements Act provides for collective bargaining, but does not make it mandatory. In recent years, the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA) pushed for amendments to the major labor laws, including the Labor Union Act, the Collective Agreements Act, and the Settlement of Labor Disputes Act, which would encourage cooperative and collective bargaining and deter unfair employer and union labor practices. These amendments establish an administrative agency to regulate unfair labor practices. This paper aims to introduce the organization and procedures of the National Labor Relations Board in U.S.A. and the Labor Relations Commission in Japan concerning the unfair labor practices case handing, and present some proposals to improve our system. |
Relation: | 法學評論, 114, 301-382 |
Data Type: | article |
Appears in Collections: | [政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文
|
Files in This Item:
File |
Size | Format | |
114(301-382).pdf | 882Kb | Adobe PDF2 | 1164 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.
2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(
nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.