English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50925436      Online Users : 956
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96699


    Title: 論國際漁業法中涉及捕魚實體的爭端解決機制(上)
    Other Titles: Dispute Settlement Regimes for Solving the Disputes involving Fishing Entities under International Fishery Law
    Authors: 高聖惕
    Gau, Michael Sheng-Ti
    Keywords: 捕魚實體;區域性漁業管理組織(RFMO);一九九五年跨界魚種協定(UNFSA);一九八二年海洋法公約(UNCLOS);常設仲裁法院(PCA);國際海洋法法庭(ITLOS);南方黑鮪保育委員會(CCSBT);美洲熱帶鮪魚委員會(IATTC);中西太平洋鮪魚委員會(WCPFC);大西洋鮪類國際保育委員會(ICCAT)與印度洋鮪類委員會(IOTC);安地瓜公約(Antigua Convention);爭端解決;台灣;合作非締約方;實體或捕魚實體
    Fishing entities;Regional Fishery Management Organization(RFMO);1995 UNFSA;1982 UNCLOS;Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA);ITLOS;CCSBT;IATTC;WCPFC;ICCAT;IOTC;Dispute Settlement;Antigua Convention;Taiwan;Cooperating Non-Contracting Party;Entity;Fishing Entity
    Date: 2007-02
    Issue Date: 2016-05-16 17:13:52 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 一九九五年之UNFSA乃第一個囊括捕魚實體之用語及概念之多邊條約，且UNFSA之規範準用於捕魚實體。由於捕魚實體無法成為UNFSA之締約國，是以欲將捕魚實體整合至UNFSA之規範架構中，即必須採取間接之方式。捕魚實體乃是透過各個區域性漁業管理組織（RFMOs），方能依其遵守養護及管理措施之程度，享受漁捕及其他利益與權利。捕魚實體之概念，實際上乃專為台灣所量身訂作，其目的在於促使將台灣整合進入國際漁業管理之規範架構中。台灣以不同地位參與五個區域性漁業管理組織之工作，即CCSBT、IATTC、WCPFC、ICCAT及IOTC。前三個區域性漁業管理組織為了執行UNFSA，已經完成其組織文件之修改或草擬。本文即在透過檢視此三個區域性漁業管理組織中處理涉及捕魚實體之爭端之機制，以審視此三個區域性漁業管理組織之組織文件如何將捕魚實體加以整合、以及整合之程度。本文探討之爭端，包括介於捕魚實體與區域性漁業管理組織委員會間之爭端，以及介於捕魚實體與其他區域性漁業管理組織會員間之爭端。本文首先介紹由UNFSA及UNCLOS所創設之爭端解決機制，並將重點放在捕魚實體能夠受利於此等機制之程度。以此簡介作為出發點，本文檢視此三個區域性漁業管理組織就涉及捕魚實體之爭端而言，發展出了多少種其他爭端解決規則。藉由此類問題之探討，吾人將可評估：在十年前UNFSA首次提出將捕魚實體整合至國際漁業管理體制之想法後，此等想法在今日被執行之程度。
    The incorporation of the term and concept of fishing entities in a multilateral treaty was first done in the 1995 UNFSA, which applies mutatis mutandis to fishing entities. The UNFSA denies access to fishing entities to become a Party of the State, and whose incorporation into the regulatory framework established by the UNFSA thus has to follow an indirect track. It is through the Regional Fishery Management Organizations (RFMOs) that fishing entities may receive benefits, the right to fish and other rights which are commensurate with their commitment to comply with conservation and management measures with respect to the fish stocks. The concept of fishing entities is actually tailor-made to facilitate the incorporation of Taiwan into the regulatory framework of international fisheries governance. Taiwan has participated with different statuses in the functioning of five RFMOs, namely, CCSBT, IATTC, WCPFC, ICCAT, and IOTC. The first three RFMOs have gone through a process of amending or drafting its constituent instruments for the purposes of implementing the UNFSA. The author intends to review how and to what extent these three RFMOs have been incorporating fishing entities into such constituent instruments by examining the various mechanisms for settling disputes involving fishing entities. The disputes between a fishing entity and the RFMO Commission and between a fishing entity and other RFMO Members are both discussed in this paper. The paper starts with an introduction of the dispute settlement regime established by the UNFSA and the UNCLOS, focusing on the degree to which fishing entities can benefit from such a mechanism. Using such an introduction as the point of departure, the author sets out to determine how many more rules those three RFMOs have developed to solve disputes involving a fishing entity. Such an examination may assist us in evaluating the implementation of the ideas to incorporate fishing entities in the international fisheries governance, initiated by the UNFSA a decade ago.
    Relation: 法學評論, 95, 229-264
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    95(229-264).pdf727KbAdobe PDF2791View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback