English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50926317      Online Users : 860
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96698


    Title: 婚姻家庭與性別平等——親屬法變遷的觀察與反思
    Other Titles: Family and Gender Equality: A Critical Assessment on Family Law Reform
    Authors: 李立如
    Lee, Li-Ju
    Keywords: 性別平等;夫妻協議;婚姻制度;同性婚姻;家庭制度;多元化家庭;親屬法修正
    Family Law Reform;Gender Equality;Egalitarian Marriage;Same-Sex Marriage;Feminist Legal Theory
    Date: 2007-02
    Issue Date: 2016-05-16 17:13:33 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 性別平等原則的落實已成為我國近年來親屬法發展的主軸之一。本文檢視近年來民法親屬編之修正後發現，立法者的主要作法乃是將條文中性化（去性別化），明訂夫妻享有同等之權利義務，並規定雙方以協議方式共享決策權。不過，父權體制對台灣社會仍然具有普遍而強大的影響力，因此親屬法之修正雖有宣示的正面效果，但對於撼動根深蒂固的性別刻板印象而言，效果可能相當有限。本文認為，為避免法律制度對於促進性別平等的努力流於形式，親屬法修正的另一個（或下一個）發展方向，應在於正面積極挑戰父權體制的根本結構。本文建議重新型塑傳統上支撐父權體制的兩個主要制度：婚姻與家庭制度。藉由法律規範重新定義婚姻與家庭制度以稀釋其所承載的性別意涵，並減緩其對於性別刻板印象的支持與複製功效。本文相信，當性別刻板印象漸漸失所依附，父權體制的支持系統漸漸崩解之時，性別平等原則才有真正落實的可能。
    Gender equality has been one of the driving forces behind family law reform in Taiwan. The new family law no longer recognizes or reinforces patriarchal family practices. It instead uses gender neutral language and requires married couples to share decision-making power. However, the traditional patriarchal norms and practices still have great influence on the Taiwanese family and society. Operating in the shadow of the patriarchal system, the new family law alone might not be able to help foster egalitarian marital relations and society as the legislators and reformers had hoped. The author suggests that the next step of the legal reform should aim to deconstruct the patriarchal system by redefining the two underpinning institutions of the patriarchal system: marriage and family.
    Relation: 法學評論, 95, 175-228
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    95(175-228).pdf989KbAdobe PDF21956View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback