English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50799313      Online Users : 785
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96696


    Title: 論當事人協力義務——以行政執行制度為例
    Other Titles: Litigants’Obligation to Assist in Administrative Enforcement System
    Authors: 蕭文生
    HSIAO, Wen-Sheng
    Keywords: 當事人協力義務;程序參與;職權調查;舉證責任;行政執行;真實具結義務
    Assisting Obligation;Procedural Participation;Duty to Investigation;Burden of Proof;Administrative Enforcement;Affidavit-Offering Obligation
    Date: 2007-02
    Issue Date: 2016-05-16 17:13:04 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 協力義務近年來成為公法學界討論的標的，從最早提出協力義務的租稅法領域，擴及至一般行政法的範圍，最終在憲法解釋中獲得明確的承認。惟仔細觀察「協力義務」的規定以及法律效果，可以發現在「協力義務」的概念下，事實上存在許多不同的類型，大法官釋字第五八八號解釋，將當事人協力義務概念帶入行政執行制度中，促使法務部行政執行署新研擬的行政執行法部分條文條正草案，依據大法官釋字第五八八號解釋，引進新類型的當事人協力義務。本文之目的在藉由說明人民參與行政決定過程的發展、協力義務產生的原因及演變，使行政執行制度中當事人協力義務的引進與適用，能夠更加正確及合乎目的。
    Litigants’ obligation to assist in administrative decision making has become the target of discussion in the field of the public law, which has ranged from the tax law, the domain of the general administrative law, to the final explicit acknowledgement in the interpretation of the Constitution. However, if we closely observe the regulations of this obligation and their legal effects, we can see that, under the concept of assisting obligation, there are various types of it. The Judicial Yuan (J. Y.) Interpretation No. 588 of the Grand Justices integrated the notion of litigants’ obligation to assist with the administrative enforcement system. Therefore, the Administrative Enforcement Agency of the Ministry of Justice drafted it into part of the articles of the new administrative enforcement law based on the Interpretation of No. 588. The objective of this article is to make the introduction and application of the obligation to assist more accurate and more appropriate through the explication of the development of people’s participation in the administrative decision making process, and the reason and the shift of the emergence of assisting obligation.
    Relation: 法學評論, 95, 127-174
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    95(127-174).pdf734KbAdobe PDF21814View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback