政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96671
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  全文筆數/總筆數 : 113303/144284 (79%)
造訪人次 : 50803582      線上人數 : 627
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
搜尋範圍 查詢小技巧：
  • 您可在西文檢索詞彙前後加上"雙引號"，以獲取較精準的檢索結果
  • 若欲以作者姓名搜尋，建議至進階搜尋限定作者欄位，可獲得較完整資料
    •  進階搜尋


    請使用永久網址來引用或連結此文件: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96671


    題名: 再論我國保險人請求權代位之性質
    其他題名: A Reexamination of the Nature of Insurers` Right of Subrogation in Taiwan
    作者: 陳俊元
    Chen, Chun-Yuan
    關鍵詞: 損害填補原則;保險人請求權代位;法定債權移轉;英美保險代位理論;擬制信託
    the principle of indemnity;subrogation;legal assignment;common law subrogation theory;constructive trust
    日期: 2006-04
    上傳時間: 2016-05-16 16:30:25 (UTC+8)
    摘要: 本文係在討論保險人請求權代位之性質與相關問題。對於保險人請求權代位之性質，我國通說將其定位為「法定債之移轉」，但是否完全妥適，立法政策上應仍有討論之空間。而除了原有的爭議外，近來學說亦漸有不同見解提出，故更應有加以探討之必要。藉由立法例與學說的歸納，本文整理三種主要的代位模式，並著重較多學說所主張的英美保險代位理論，由學說上的爭議點切入，以探討其與法定移轉理論之差異與處理相關問題時的優劣。本文以為，法定移轉理論與英美保險代位理論運作之模式不同，亦各有特點，立法政策上的修改亦當需要更為審慎的評估；惟從現狀下的許多問題而言，英美保險代位理論應能提供一參考與修正的方向。對於學說與實務適用法定移轉理論之疑義，本文亦將提出相關建議，以供未來之參酌。
    This paper examines the nature of insurers’ right of subrogation and related issues. In Taiwan, an insurer’s right of subrogation is generally defined as legal assignment; however, there would appear to be considerable room for debate as to whether this is a wholly appropriate way of dealing with the issue. In addition to the long-standing debate over the appropriateness of this definition, in recent years several new views on the subject have been put forward; these views also need to be considered. Examining both legal precedent and juristic theory, this paper analyzes the three main subrogation models, focusing in particular on common law insurance subrogation theory, which has the most support from legal scholars. By concentrating on the juristic aspects, the paper explores the differences between common law subrogation theory and legal assignment theory, and on their ability to explain the relevant problems. The paper concludes that models based on common law subrogation theory and those on legal assignment theory demonstrate significant differences, and that careful evaluation is needed when making revisions to legislative policy. It is suggested that, when tackling the various problems that exist in this area, common law subrogation theory may be able to offer useful insights. The paper also offers recommendations regarding the doubts–both theoretical and practical–that have been raised with respect to the adoption of legal assignment theory.
    關聯: 法學評論, 90, 229-300
    資料類型: article
    顯示於類別:[政大法學評論 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    文件中的檔案:

    檔案 大小格式瀏覽次數
    90(229-300).pdf818KbAdobe PDF23285檢視/開啟


    在政大典藏中所有的資料項目都受到原著作權保護.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - 回饋