政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96565
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51029366      Online Users : 897
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96565


    Title: 社區能力與社區生活品質之研究：對社區治理與社區發展的意涵
    Other Titles: A Study on Community Capacity and Community Life Quality: Implications for Community Governance and Community Development
    Authors: 黃源協;莊俐昕;劉素珍
    Hwang, Yuan-Shie;Chuang, Li-Hsin;Liu, Su-Jen
    Keywords: 社區能力;社區生活品質;社區治理;社區發展;社區發展協會
    community capacity;community life qualityt;community governance;community development;Association of Community Development
    Date: 2015-09
    Issue Date: 2016-05-11 17:08:09 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 本研究旨在探討社區能力與社區生活品質之間的關係，尤其是社區能力對社區生活品質的影響，並據以分析對台灣社區治理與社區發展的意涵。社區能力區分靜態能力與動態能力，靜態能力包括5個次面向（關係力、人資力、財物力、環境力與文化力），共計52個題項；動態能力包括4個次面向（參與力、連結力、領導力與組織力），共計40個題項。社區生活品質區分為兩大面向─個人層級與社區層級生活品質，個人層級包括3個次面向（社區參與、社區意識與居住環境），共計27個題項；社區層級包括3個次面向（人文教育、經濟福祉與公共設施），共計44個題項。研究樣本係採PPS抽樣方法，自台灣本島之6,220個立案社區發展協會抽取1,200個為研究樣本，受訪者為協會的理事長或總幹事，實際完成有效問卷640份。研究發現，社區能力與社區生活品質兩者之間存在著高度的正向關聯性。另外，社區靜態的「財務力」及動態的「關係力」，對社區生活品質有顯著的解釋力。在依研究結果進行分析和討論後，本研究提出五項建議供未來台灣在社區治理與社區發展推動上的參考。
    This study aims to investigate the relationship between community capacity (CC) and community life quality (CLQ) and, in particular, the impact of CC on CLQ. Based on its findings, the study is further intended to explore the implications for ‘community governance’ and ‘community development’ in Taiwan. The CC is divided into two categories – community statics capacity (CSC) and community dynamic capacity (CDC). The CSC scale includes 52 items and is further grouped into 5 dimensions, and CDC includes 40 items and is further categorized into 4 dimensions. The CLQ scale is divided into individual-level life quality and community-level life quality. The former includes 27 items and is further divided into 3 dimensions. The latter includes 44 items and is further divided into 3 dimensions. 640 leaders of Community Development Associations in Taiwan were successfully interviewed. The results show that there are significant and positive correlations between CC and CLQ. Further, the ‘financial capacity’ of CSC, and the ‘participative capacity’ of CDC significantly influence CLQ. According to the findings and discussions, five implications and suggestions related to promoting community governance and community development are proposed.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 49,1-35
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Public Administration] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    49(1-35).pdf700KbAdobe PDF2390View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback