English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50915105      Online Users : 793
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96522


    Title: 推動性別主流化之過程評估：架構建立與先導研究
    Other Titles: Evaluating the Implementation Process of Gender Mainstreaming in Taiwan: Framework Building and A Pilot Study
    Authors: 彭渰雯;李秉叡
    Peng, Yen-Wen;Li, Ping-Jui
    Keywords: 性別主流化;過程評估;執行評估;評估架構;先導研究
    gender mainstreaming;process evaluation;implementation evaluation;evaluation framework;pilot study
    Date: 2011-03
    Issue Date: 2016-05-11 16:18:21 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 行政院各部會自2005年10月起，展開為期4年的第一階段「性別主流化實施計畫」，已在2009年底告一段落，也產生了對執行過程之評估的需求，以回饋第二階段計畫之進行。基此，本研究參考歐盟研究各國性別主流化執行經驗的評估架構，以及國際間性別主流化相關文獻的討論，針對第一階段各部會執行性別主流化實施計畫的情形，設計一套包含目標、行動者與工具等3個構面、6個子題的評估架構與問卷題項。接著，作者將問卷發送給各部會性別業務承辦人，進行了一次先導研究，以瞭解第一階段性別主流化推動概況，以及本套評估架構的適用度。本文除了逐一說明6個子題的評估結果之外，也在最後的討論中，從題項設計及資料蒐集策略等方面，檢討本次前導研究的經驗，並提出對於未來正式的過程評估之建議。
    Starting since October 2005 and lasted for 4 years, the first phase of Gender Mainstreaming Program in the central government in Taiwan has come to its end. This research draws on the insight of EQUAPOL research study that assessed the progress and impact of gender-sensitive policies in the European Union, and develops its own framework to evaluate the implementation process of the Gender Mainstreaming Program in Taiwan. The authors designed a structured questionnaire that embodied six sub-dimensions for evaluation, and conducted a pilot study on the frontline bureaucrats who were in charge of gender mainstreaming affairs. This paper explores the results of the pilot study, reflecting on the strength and weakness of the evaluation framework and research design, and then concludes with some suggestions for further process evaluation research.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 38,115-150
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學報 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    38(p.115-150).pdf1074KbAdobe PDF2186View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback