政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96505
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50934228      Online Users : 932
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96505


    Title: 民眾不同陳情管道相對效能之比較
    Other Titles: Exploration to the Comparative Effectiveness of Petition Channels: Attempts to Solve the Dilemma between Internet Petition and Resources Consumption
    Authors: 陳祥;黃伸閔
    Chen, Hsiang;Huang, Shen-Min
    Keywords: 陳情管道;電子郵件陳情;陳情滿意度;政府效能;公民關係管理
    petitioning channels;e-mail petitions;petition satisfactory;government efficiency;citizen relation management
    Date: 2009-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-11 16:02:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 政府開放電子郵件作為民眾之陳情管道素有便捷、低成本之優點，但卻同時導致被陳情之行政機構忙於應付與回覆龐大且無意義之垃圾陳情案，進而迫使機關內部正常行政運作機能遭到擠壓。要如何在廣納民眾陳情意見的同時，又能兼顧行政資源的適度配置與政務的推動，實為政府部門創造雙贏的思考方向。本研究比較包含網路在內之不同陳情管道之效能與民眾之滿意度，針對過去半年內曾向各級行政機構陳情過的461位陳情民眾進行問卷調查。證據顯示，使用電子郵件的陳情者較其他管道使用者有更高的陳情滿意度，且認為被陳情機構的回覆效率更高，回覆態度更好，回覆內容更具體、具備更高的可行性，也少有反覆陳情的現象。基於電子郵件陳情管道有較高的滿意度等指標間顯著關連性存在，因此支持電子郵件作為首要陳情管道有其必要性，唯各機關在實質解決問題程度仍有待加強，建議依據問題難易程度，在困難回覆與處理上，應選擇雙向、高互動性且資訊豐富度高的傳統管道作為妥善的管理分工。
    Taking the advantages of both convenience and low cost, recently the majority of petitioners write their petitions with the e-mail. The advantages for petitioners become the nightmare of petitioned government agencies due to the production of huge petition garbage. It results in the lagged administrative processes and relocated resources. Can the effectiveness of the Internet e-mail as the major petitioning channel justify itself? Or the government should limit its use? With a survey to a sample of 461 petitioners who have petitioned in last six months, this study shows that using the e-mail as the petitioning channel makes petitioners more satisfactory, with a feedback of more efficiency, more positive attitudes, more specific, and more usefulness, to the returned answers from petitioned government agencies. Besides, for the same event, petitioners employing the e-mail channel make less repetitive petitions both to the same government agency and also across different government agencies. The relations between positive attitudes and petitioning channels justify the employment of the e-mail as the major petitioning channel. To face the new situation, the government should promote the employment of e-mail as a petitioning tool, and in the meantime, relocate more resources to support the e-mail petitions.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 33,1-43
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Public Administration] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    33(p.83-120).pdf1214KbAdobe PDF23676View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback