政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96470

政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/96470

English | 正體中文 | 简体中文 | Post-Print筆數 : 27 | Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51656214 Online Users : 414

RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.

Scope

please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results

please goto advance search for comprehansive author search

Adv. Search

Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer

Goto mobile version

政大典藏 > College of Education > Department of Education > Theses > Item 140.119/96470

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96470

Title:	勞工的人格特質、安全管理與態度關係研究 A Comprehensive Study of Labors`` Personality Trait/Attitude and Safety Management
Authors:	陳文宣 Chen, Wen-Shuan
Contributors:	葉學志盧欽銘 Yeh, Hsueh-Chih Lu, Ching-Ming 陳文宣 Chen, Wen-Shuan
Keywords:	人格特質安全管理態度 Personality trait Sfety management Attitude
Date:	1994
Issue Date:	2016-05-11
Abstract:	本研究旨在探討勞工安全人格特質傾向、安全管理與態度的關係：其次比較分析企業內勞工人口變項類別（性別、年齡、教育程度、服務年資、事故經驗、工作證照）、組織環境變項類別（安全委員會、職業類別、員工數、工作地區、作業場所、安全訊息）在勞工人格特質（容易疲勞程度、懦弱程度、毅力不足程度、含糊程度、自制力脆弱程度、輕率程度、協調性不足程度、神經質程度）、組織安全管理（上級指導、安全教育、安全設備、安全措施、安全標識）及勞工態度（對人、對事、對物）上的差異；並尋求前述人格特質、安全管理與態度三者之間的關係；進而尋找有效預測勞工態度的變項因素。研究採取問卷調查法，以自編『安全教育相關因素調查表』進行施測。調查表包括基本資料、安全性格傾向（人格特質）調查表、安全管理與態度問卷等三部份。受試包括臺灣地區的院轄市、省轄市及縣轄市鄉鎮的企業內勞工，調查表（問卷）的回收率達72.03%。回收調查表經過統計處理分析，就整體而言，獲得主要結論如下：一、在人格特質，男勞工較女勞工穩定；在安全管理，則無性別間的差異；在態度方面，性別之間，沒有顯著差異。二、在人格特質，不同年齡的勞工之間，沒有顯著差異；年齡組愈高，則其安全管理愈佳；在態度上，具有顯著差異，50-59歲組及40-49歲組均優於20-29歲組。從機械操作安全的觀點來看，年齡較大經驗豐富，相對地，意外事故較少。三、在人格特質，高中組勞工較大專以上組及國中組勞工穩定；在安全管理，具有顯著差異，國中組勞工優於大專以上組勞工；不同教育程度度勞工在態度而言並無顯著差異。四、服務年資愈久，其人格特質愈趨穩定；服務年資愈久，在安全管理愈佳；在態度方面，服務年資愈久。表現愈優。五、在人格特質，沒有事故經驗勞工較有事故經驗勞工穩定；在安全管理，對於有無事故經驗勞工來講，安全設備具有影響外，其他因素均無顯著差異；在態度上，沒有事故經驗勞工優於有事故經驗勞工。六、在人格特質、安全管理及態度，有工作證照勞工均優於無工作證照勞工。七、在人格特質、安全管理及態度，有安全委員會勞工均優於沒有安全委員會勞工。八、在人格特質、裝卸業優於製造業，營建業亦優於製造業；在安全管理，裝卸業優於製造業，營建業亦優於製造業；在態度上，營建業勞工優於製造業勞工。九、不同員工數勞工之間，在人格特質、安全管理及態度，並無顯著差異。十、在人格特質，縣轄市鄉鎮勞工優於院轄市及省轄市勞工；在安全管理，縣轄市鄉鎮勞工優於院轄市勞工；在態度上，並無顯著差異。十一、不同作業場所勞工之間，在人格特質、安全管理及態度，均無顯著差異。十二、在人格特質、安全管理及態度，充足安全訊息勞工均優於沒有及不充足安全訊息勞工。十三、透過第一典型因素，在安全管理的上級指導、安全教育、安全設備、安全措施、安全標識愈低者，其人格特質的容易疲勞程度、毅力不足程度、含糊程度、自制心脆弱程愈高。透過第二典型因素，安全管理的上級指導愈高者，其人格特質的懦弱程度及協調性不足程度愈高。透過第三典型因素，安全管理的安全設備愈高者，其人格特質的毅力不足程度及神經質程度愈低。十四、透過第一典型因素，自制心脆弱程度、輕率程度、神經質程度愈高者，其對人、事的態度愈低。透過第二典型因素，人格特質的含糊程度愈低者，其對人、對物的態度愈高。十五、透過第一典型因素，安全管理的上級指導、安全教育、安全設備、安全措施、安全標識愈低者，其對人、對事、對物的態度亦較愈低。透過第二典型因素，安全管理的安全標識愈低者，則對人的態度愈高，而對物的態度愈低。十六、安全設備、毅力不足程度及安全措施等變項對人的態度影響是正向的；但安全標識、神經質程度、輕率程度及毅力不足程度等變項對人安全態度影響卻是負向的。在13個（容易疲勞程度、懦弱程度、毅力不足程度、含糊程度、自制心脆弱程度、輕率程度、協調性不足程度、神經質程度、上級指導、安全教育、安全設備、安全指施、安全標識）變項中，有29.106%的可解釋量。十七、安全設備、毅力不足程度、上級指導及安全措施等變項對事的態度的影響是正向的；但是，安全標識、懦弱程度、神經質程度及輕率程度等變項對事的安全態度的影響卻是負向的。在13個變項，則有25.001%的可解釋量。十八、協調性不足程度、安全教育及上級指導等變項對物的態度的影響是正向的。在13個變項中，則有18.493%的可解釋量。依據本研究所得結果，將分別對有關單位、勞資雙方與未來研究者提出建議，供做參考。
Reference:	一、中文部份丁祖蔭、強贛生(民77 )譯。社會心理學。台北市:五洲出版社，頁279-280 。王作榮(民61) 。工業技術教育之原理。台北市:中國工業職業教育學會。王家通、曾燦燈(民77 )。教育行政學。高雄市:復文書局。田培林(民64 )。教育史。台北市:正中書局。呂山海譯(民78) 、角本定男原著。安全管理。台北市:書泉出版社，頁179-180。呂俊甫、吳靜吉、王煥琛、曾志朗等(民62)。教育心理學。台北市:大中國圖書公司。呂槃、楊瑞鍾、葉文裕、李景美(民80)。台北市四種製造業勞工安全衛生知識、態度、習慣及教育訓練策略研究。行政院勞委會全國勞工安全衛生研討會資料彙編(Ｉ) , 頁40-70 。李大偉、王昭明(民78 )。技職教育課程發展理論與實務。台北市:師大書苑。角本定男著，呂山海(民78 )編譯。安全管理。書泉出版社。沈德盛(民80) 0 5S運動與勞工安全衛生。行政院勞工安全委員會全國勞工安全衛生研討會，資料彙編(Ｉ) ，頁8- 12。吳清基(民79)。教育與行政。台北市:師大書苑。林邦傑(民75) 。統計方法的選擇與統計電腦套裝程式的使用 SPSS SAS BMDP 應用指引。台北市:正昇教育科學社。林清山(民77)。多變項分析統計法。台北市:台灣東華書局。林淑梨、王若蘭、黃慧真譯(民80)。人格心理學。台北市:心理出版社。周春美(民82)。我國高級中等學校職業類科專業科目教師赴公民營機構研習意願及其影響因素之研究。國立彰化師範大學工業教育研究所碩士論文。徐正光(民69) 。工人與工作態度:台灣工廠人的實證研究。中央研究院民族學研究所專刊之二十六。高桂足等(民63)。心理學名詞彙編。台北市:文景出版社。康自立(民78.7.1)。系統方略與訓練教材之發展。台北市:就業與訓練第九卷第四期。康嘉裕(民76 )。零災害運動手冊。台灣電力公司。許秀光(民76) 。製造業勞工安全評鑑制度之研究。中國文化大學勞工研究所碩士學位論文。莊仲仁、鄭伯標(民78 )。安全管理安全態度與意外行為的關係係Fishbein模式之應用。行政院國科會防災科技研究報告77-51號。莊仲仁、鄭伯標(民79)。工業災害中的人為錯誤的探討(一) :初步研究。行政院國科會防災科技研究報告NSC 79- 0414-P002-20B。張天開(民73)。勞工教育。台北市:聯經出版事業公司。張春興(民76 )。心理學。台北市:三民書局。張春興(民78)。張氏心理學辭典。台北市:東華書局。張春興、林清山(民63 )教育心理學。台北市:文景書局。陳大齊(民49)。實用理則學。台北市:遠東圖書公司。陳文宣(民77a) 。工業安全與衛生。台北市:全華科技。陳文宣(民77b) 。工廠佈置與管理。台北市:全華科技。陳文宣(民79) 。日本技職教育訓練模式的探討。技術及職業教育雙月刊，試刊號，頁13-17 。陳文宣(民82a) 。車輛系營建機械安全防護標準之研討(Ｉ) 。行政院勞工委員會安全衛生研究所八十二年度研究計畫，計畫編號: IOSH82-S104。陳文宣(民82b) 。台灣地區勞工安全教育效能之研究。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫，計畫編號: NSC 82-0301-H-018-002 。陳慶瑞(民78) 。費德勒權變領導理論研究。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。陳聰文(民82) 。專科學校企業倫理教學之研究。政治大學教育研究所博士論文。陳聰勝(民82.7.1) 。因應環境變動發展職業訓練新里程。台北市:就業與訓練第十一卷第四期。陳聰勝(民78) 。我國職業訓練現況。台北市:工業職業教育雙月刊第七卷第四期。湯明輝(民76) 。勞工的參與管理:理論與實務。台北市:中華民國勞資關係協進會。黃炳煌(民72) 。教育與訓練。台北市:文景書局。黃榮村(民78) 。心理學。台北市:五南圖書出版公司。葉學志(民77)。教育哲學。台北市:三民書局。楊孝榮(民74)。勞工研究方法。台北市:黎明文化事業公司。楊亮功(民63) 。教育學研究。台北市:台灣商務印書館。楊朝祥(民80) 。技術職業教育理論與實務。台北市:三民書局。葛樹人(民80)。心理測驗學。台北市:桂冠圖書公司。趙守博(民81)。勞工政策與勞工問題。台北市:中國生產力中心。劉春榮(民82) 。國民小學組織結構、組織承諾與學校效能關係研究。政治大學教育研究所博士論文。盧欽銘校訂(民81)，張厚燦主編，孟慶茂、馮伯麟編寫。心理與教育統計學。台北市:五南圖書公司。戴永久(民80 )。品質管理。台北市:三民書局。羅文基(民78)。工業安全衛生。台北市:三民書局。蘇德勝(民80 )。勞工檢查與自動檢查研討會論文集，頁45。正中書局編輯委員會(民56) 。教育研究法。台北市:正中書局。勞工委員會編印(民81) 。勞工檢查參考手冊。勞工檢查叢書( 01-10-06 )。勞工安全衛生法及其施行細則(民81.4.) 。行政院勞委會。中華民國80年勞工檢查年報(民81.10) 。行政院勞委會。國家建設六年計畫(民80. 10) 。行政院經建會。勞工安全衛生教育訓練規則(民81. 5) 。行政院勞委會。勞工安全教育法規與解釋令彙編(民79.6) 。行政院勞委會。二、日文部份上原陽一、平野敏右( 1991 )。安全?危險?間?評價一安全? 目盛。東京:???社。丸山康則(平成2 ，1990)。????安全學。東京: 中央勞動災害防止協會。大島正光(昭和57，1982) 。?????未來??????? 同文書院。大島正光(昭和60， 1985) 。人間???????。(財)醫療情報????，開發?????東京。中島新光(昭和46 ， 1971)。現場監督者????土木施工-安全施工?要點。鹿島研究所出版會。中間康隆(1991) 。不安全行動?要因?探?。安全Vol.42 ，No. 12 , 1991，日本中央勞動災害防止協會，頁52- 53。中央勞動災害防止協會(平成3，1991)。不安全行動?作業者 ?心理的要因?調查研究委員會報告書(第3報)。東東。井上威恭(昭和63， 1988) 。新??安全?科學。東京:中央勞動災害防止協會。正田亙(昭和60，1985) 。安全????心理學。東京:中央勞動災害防止協會。白佐俊憲( 1992)。頁5 間接引用自現場?問題解決???? 編集委員會( 1991 )。安全?確保????。東京:日科技連出版社。西島茂一(平成4，1992)。乙????。東京:中央勞動災害防止協會。多賀谷敏夫(1987) 。日本本????職業訓練?課題?方策。國際職業教育與訓練研討會，教育部，台北市。谷村富男(1991) 。安全性格診斷????報告。??????生 ????。安全Vol.42 ，No.12 , 1991 。日本中央勞動災害防止協會，頁52- 53。長町三生(昭和60` 1985) 。安全????行動科學。東京:中央勞動災害防止協會。依田新、詫摩武俊、依田明(平成4 , 1992) 。性格。東京：大日本圖書。前郁夫、平野敏右( 1991 )。安全????管理。安全?目盛。東京:???社。柴田俊忍(平成3年5 月，1991) 。災害發生機構?災害防止對策。高橋恒彥( 1984) 。安全活動?評價。中央勞動災害防止協會。富川秀四郎( 1988) 。安全管理????????。安全Vo1.39 ,No. 3 , 1988 。東京:中央勞動災害防止協會，頁6-9。森田褔男、谷村富男，(1992) 。安全衛生?考?方進?方。東京:日科技連。褔山郁生(昭和60` 1985)。 SE????作業?安全。東京:財團法人總合安全工學研究所，頁24- 27 。熊圾慶次(1991)。新入者?指導?生??安全性格診斷。安全 V01.42 , No.12 , 1991。日本中央勞動災害防止協會，頁52- 53 。齊藤勇(1992)。人間關係?心理學。東京:誠信書房。橋本邦衛(平成2 , 1990)。安全人間工學。東京:中央勞動災害防止協會。鮑戶弘(1965)。態度構造研究?方法論關??諸問題- - - -要因分析??中心?----心理學評論， 9 ，267- 288 。日本中央勞動災害防止協會(平成3，1991)。不安全行動?作業者?心理的要因?調查研究委員會報告書(第3報) 。日本中央勞動災害防止協會(1993)。安全Vol.44， No.1 , 1993 9 頁52-53 。安全衛生法令要覽(平成4，1992)。日本勞動省安全衛生部監修，中央勞動災害防止協會。勞動省安全課編(昭和59 , 1984) 。安全用語辭典。東京:中央勞動災害防止協會，頁2。勞動省安全衛生部安全課(平成4，1992)。安全管理者?實務。東京:中央勞動災害防止協會，頁138- 139。現場?問題解決????編集委員會(1991)。安全?確保?? 　　。東京:日科技連出版社。對人行動學研究會(1991)。對人行動?心理學。東京:誠信書房。 Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M.(1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin,84,888-918. Ajzen, I ., & Fishbein. M.(1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs. N.J. : Prentice-Hall. Inc. Allport, G.W. (1935).Attitudes. In C. Murchison (Ed.). Handbook of social psychology (Vol.2).Worcester. Clark University Press. 798-844. Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and growth In personality. New York: Holt. Rinehart & Winston. Altman. S. & Valenzi, E. & Hodgetts, R. M.(1985). Organizational behavior: theory and practice. London: Academic press. Anderson. N.H. (1974). Cognitive algebra: Integration theory eory applied to social attribution. In L. Berk owitz. (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 7. Academic Press. 1-101. Apsler, R .. & Sears. D.O.(1968). Warning. personal involvement. and sttitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 9.162-168. Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An Introduction to Motivation. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold. 273-274. Blake. Robert R .. and Mouton. Jane S. (1964). The Managerial Grid (Huston. Tex: Gulf). Borgatta, Edgar F.(1967)."The work Components Study: A Set of Measures for Work Motivation." Journal of Psycho- logical Studies,16,1-11;and Borgatta, Edgar F., Ford, Robert N., and Bohrnstedt, George W.(1968) "The Components Study: A Revised Set of Measures for Work Motivation, "Multivariate Behavioral Reasearch, 3,403-414. Brehm, J.W.(1966). A theory of psycholgical reaetance Academic Press. Brehm, s.s., & Brehm, J.W. (1961). Psychological reactance : A theory of freedom and control. Academic Press. Breseheid, E. (1966). Ooinion shange and communicator-communicatee similarity and dissimilarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4,670-680. Brock, T.C. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 3,296 Cacioppo, J.T.,& Petty, R.E. (1979). Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive responses, recall , and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 97-109. Campbell, John P. et al(1970). Managerial Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness. New York: McGraw-Hill, P. 340. Cartwright, D. (1949). Some principles of mass persuasion. Human Relations, 2, 253-267. Cattel, R.B.(1965). The scientific analysis of personality. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin Books. Chaiken, S. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37,1387-1397. Chaiken, S., & Eagly, A.H.(1976). Communication modality as determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34. 605-614. Chaiken, S ., & Eagly. A.H. (1983). Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 45. 241-256. Cialdini, R.B., Levy. H., Herman. C.P., & Evenbech, S. ( 1973). Attitude politics: The strategy of moderation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25.100- 108. Cialdini, R.B .. Petty, R.E .. & Cacioppo, J.T. (1981). Attitude and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 32, 357-404. Colling. David A.(1990). Industrial Safety Management & Tecnology, Prentice-Hall. Inc. A Division of Simon & Schuster Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey 07632. Cook, T.D., & Flay, B.P. (1978). The persistence of experimentally induced attitude change. In L. Berkowitz (Ed). Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 11. Academic Press. 1-57. Cooper, J., & Croyle, R.T. (1984). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology. 35, 395-426. Eagly, A.H. (1974). Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 758-773. Eagly, A.H .. & Chaiken, S. (1975). An attribution analy-sis of the effect of communicator, chracteristics on opinion change : The case of communicator attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32.136-144. Eagly, A.H., & Himmelfarb,(1978). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 29, 517-554. Eagly, A.H .. & Warren. R. (1976) Intelligence, comprehension, and opinion change. Journal of Personality, 44, 226-242. Erikson, E.(1963). Childhood and society. (rev. ed.) New York: Norton. Eysenck, H.J. (1954). The psychology of politics. Routledge & kegan Paul. Faison, E.W. (1961). Affectiveness of one-sided and two-sided mass communications and advertising. Public Opinion Quaterly, 25, 486-69. Fazio, R.H., & Zanna, M.P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 14. Academic Press, 161-202. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press . . Festinger, L., & Maccoby, N. (1964). On resistance to persuasive communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 68, 359-366. Fiedler, Fred E.(1967).A Theory of Leadership Effectives. New York: McGraw-Hill, P.8. Fishbein, M. A.(1980), A theory of reasoned action: Some applications and implication. In H. Howe & M. Page ( Eds.).Nebraska Symposium on Motivation (vol 27). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intension and behavior : An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley. Fitts, P. M., and Posner, M. 1.(1967). Human Performance. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing Co. Ford, Robert N., Boegatta, Edgar F., and Bohrnstedt, George W.(1969). "Use of the Work Components Study with New College:"Level Employees," Journal of Applied Psychology, 53,367-376. Freud, S.(1949). An outline of psychoanalysis. New York: Norton. Good, Carter V.(1973). Dictionary of Education, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Green LW., Kreuter MW., Deeds SG., & Partridge KB.(1980). Health Education Pianning: A Diagnostic Approach. Palo Alto, CA: Mayfield Publishing Company. Greenwald, A.G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion and attitude change. In A.G. Greenwald, T.C. Brock, & T.M. Ostrom (Eds.), Psychological foundation of attitude. Academic Press,147- 170. Guilford, J.P.(1959).Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14, 469-479. Haaland, G.A., & Venkatesan, M. (1968). Resistance to persuasive communications : An examination of distraction hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9, 167-170. Hass, R.G. (1981). Effective responses In persuaSlon. In R.E. petty, T.M. Ostrom, & T.C. Brock (Eds.), Cogni- tive responses In persuaSlon. Hillsdale.NJ 141-172. Erlbaum. Hass. R.G .. & Grady. K. (1975). Temporal delay. type of forewarning. and resistance to influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 11. 459-469. Hass . R.G .. & Mann. R.W. (1976). Anticipatory belieg change: Persuasion or impression management? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 34. 105 - 111. Heider. F. (1958). Psychology of interpersonal relations. Wiley. Herzberg. F .. Mansner. B .. & Synderman. B.(1959). The Motivation to Work. John Wiley. New York. House. Robert J .. and Baetz. Mary L. (1979) . If Leadership: Some Empirical Generalizations and New Research Directions." Research in Oganizational Behavior. 1.341 - 423 .The quotation is from P.345. Hovland. C.l.(1959). Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psycholohist. 14. 8-17. Hovland.C.l. & Janis. l.L.(Eds.) (1959). Personality and persuasibility. Yale University Press. Hovland. C.l .. Janis. l.L .. & Kelley. H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. Yale University Press. Hovland, c.r., Lumsdaine, A.A., & Sheffield, F.D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication. Princeton University Press. Hovland, C.I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quaterly, 15, 635-650. Janis, I.L., & Feshbach, S. (1953). Effects of feararousing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 78-92 . Janis, r.L., & Feild, P.B. (1959). A behavioral assessment of persuasibility : Consistency of individual differences. Sociometry, 19, 241-259. Janis, I.L . , & Terwilliger, R.F. (1962). An experimental study of psychological resistance to fear arous6ing communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 65. 403-410. Jones, E.E., & Davis, K.E. (1965). From acts to dispositions: The attributtion process In person perception. In L.Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. 2. Academic Press, 219-266. Jung.C.G. (1923).Psychological types. New York: Harcourt Brace. Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly. 24, 163-204. Katz, E., & Lazarsfeld, P.F. (1955). Personal influence. Free Press. Kelley, H.H. (1967). Attribution theory in social psychology. In D. Levine (Ed). Nebraska symposium on motivation, Vol. 15. University of Nebraska Press,192-238. Kelman, H.C., & Hovland, C.I. (1953). "Reinstatement" of the communicator indelayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,48, 327-335. Kiesler, C.A. (1971). The psychology of commitment: Experiments linking behavior to belief. Academic Press. Kiesler, C.A., Mathog, P., Pool, P., & Howenstine, R. ( 1971). Commitment and the boomerang effect: A field study. In C.A. Kiesler, The psychology of commibnent. Academic Press, 74-85. Krech, D., & Crutchfield, R.S. (1948). Theory and problems of social psychology. McGraw-Hill. Krech, D., Crutchfield, R.S., & Ballachey, E.L. (1962). Individual in society: A textbook of social psychology. McGraw-Hill. LaPiere, R.T. (1934). Attitudes vs. actions. Social Forces, 13, 230-237. Leventhal, H., & Singer, R.P. (1966). Affect arousal and positioning of recommendations in persuasive communi- cations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology . 4, 137-146. Maslow. Abraham H.(1954). Motivation and Personality,2nd ed.(NewYork: Harper & Row, 19701st ed.)55-56, and" A Theory of Hwnan Motivation." Psychologyical Review, 50(1943), 370-390. McGuire, W.J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in expweimental social psychology. Vol. 1. Academic Press, 191-229. McGuire. W.J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology. Vol. 3. 2nd ed. Reading. Addison-Wesley, 136-314. McGuire, W.J., & Millman. S.(1965). Anticpatory belief lowering following for ewarning of persuasive attack. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 471-479. McGuire, W.J., & Papageorgis,D. (1962). Effectiveness of forewarning in developing resistance to persuasion. Public Opinion Quarterly, 26, 24-34. Mehrabian, A & Williams,M.(1969). Nonverbal concomitants of perceived and Social Psychology, 13, 37-58. Meister, D.(1964). Methods of predicting human reliability in man-machine systems, Human Factors, 6 (6), 621-646. Meister,D.(1966). Human Factors in reability. Section 12 in W.G.Ireson, Ed., reability handbook. New York:Mc Graw-Hill. Meister,D.(1971,November). Comparative analysis of human reliability models(Report L0071-107). Westlake Village,CA: Bunker-Ramo Electronics Systems Division. Meister,D.(1984). Human reability. In F. A. MuckIer ,Ed. , Human Factors Review: 1984. Santa Monica, CA:Human Factors Society. Montana, Patrick and Charnov,Bruce H.(1987).Management, Barron`s Educational Series, Inc. ,7-28. Norman, D. A., Categorization of action slips, Psychological Review, 88(1), 1-15. Occupational Health and Safety Act of 1970, Section 18, 29 Code of Federal RegUlations, subsection c, section 6, (1984). Papageorgis, D., & McGuire, W.J. (1961). The generarity of immW1.i ty to produced by preexposure to weakened cOW1terarguments. Journal and Social Psychology, 62, 475-481. Peterson, R.C. Thurstone, L.L. (1933). The effect of motion pictures on the social attitudes of high school children. University of Chicago Press. Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1976).Forewarning, cognitive nitive responding, and resistance to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 645-655. Petty, R.E., Ostuom, T.M., & Brock, T.C. (Eds.) (1981) Cognitive responses in peruasion. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum. Petty,R.E., Well,G. L., & Brock,T.C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874-884. Reddin, W. J. (1970). Managerial Effectiveness.New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. ,127-136. ReVelle, J. B., and Boulton, L.(1981,1982)." Worker Attitudes and Perceptions to Safety," Professional Safety, 26, 28,December 1981(Part 1);27, 20, january 1982(prt II). Rigby, L. V. (1970, May). The nature of human error. In Annual technical conference transactions of the ASQC. Milwaukee, WI:American Society for Quality Control, PP.457-466. Robbins, S. P.(1991). Organizational behavior: concepts, controversies, and application. New Jersey:.Englewood. Rook, L. W.(1962, June). Reduction of human error In Industrial production (SCTM 93-62(14)). Albuquerque, NM : Sandia National Laboratories. Rosenberg, M.J., & Hovland, C.I. (1960). Cognitive, affective and behavioral components of attitudes. In M.J. Rosenberg, C.I. Hovland,(Eds.), Attitude organization and change. Yale University Press, 114. Schwartz, S.H. & Tessler, R.C. (1972). A test of amodel for reducies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 225-236. Sheldon,W.H.(1954). Atla of men:A guide for somatotyping the adult male at all ages. New York:Harper. Sensening, J., & Brehm, J.W. (1968). Attuitude change from an implied threat to attitudinal freedom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 324- 330. Sherif, C.W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R.E. (1965). Attitude change: The social judgement-involvement approach. W.B. Saunders. Sherif, C.W., Kelly, M., Rodgers, H.L., Sarup, G., & Tittler,B.I.(1973). Personal involvement, social judgment, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 27, 311-327. Sherif. M. and Hovland. C.I. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects In communication and attitude change. Yale University Press. Skinner. B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan. Skinner. B. F. (1959). Cumulative record. New York: Appleton. Snyder. M.L .. & Wicklund. R.A. (1976). Prior exercise of freedom and reactance Press. Snyder. M.L .. & Wicklund. R.A. (1976). Priorexercise of freedom and reactance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 12. 120-130. Staats.A.W. & Staats,C.K.(1966).Complex human behavior. New York:Holt,Rinehart & Winston. Steers,R. M .. & Porter.L. W.(1973). "Motivation and Work Behavior." Psychological Bulletin. 3-4. Swain, A.D. (1969.July). Overview and status of human factors reliability analysis. In Proceedings of 8th annual reliability and maintainability conference. Denver, CO: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. pp. 251-251. Swain. A.D. and Guttmann. H.E.(1983.August). Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications (Sandia National Labor- atories, NUREG/CR-1278). Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Thurstone, L.L. (1934). The vector of mind. Psychological Review, 41, 1-32. Vroom, V.H.(1964). Work and motivation. New york:Wiley. Watts, W.A. ,& Holt, L.E. (1979). Persistence of opinion change induced under conditions of forewarning and distraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 778-789. Welford, A.T. (1973). Stress and performance , Ergonomics , 16(5) , 567-580. White, D. D. & Bedner, D. A.(1986). Organizational behavior: Understanding and managlng people at work. Newton: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. Wicker, A.W. (1969). Attitudes vs. actions: The rela-tionships of verval and overt behavioral responses to attitude object. Journal of Social Issues, 25, 41-78. Wicker, A.W. (1971). An examination of the II other variables" explanation of attitude-behavior inconsistency . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,19, 18 -30. Wicklund,R.A.(1974). Freedom and reactance. Potomac, Md, : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Worchel,S., & Arnold, S.E. (1973) . The effects of censorship and attractiveness of the censor on attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9, 365-377. Worchel, S., & Brehm. J.W. (1970). Effect of threats to attitudinal freedom as a function of agreement with the communicator. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14. 18-22. Zanna. M.P .. Higgins.E.T .. & Herman. C.P. (Eds.) (1982). Consistency in social behavior:The Ontario symposium. Vol.2. Hillsdale, Hillsdale. N.J. : Erlbaum. Zellner-M. (1970). Self-esteem, reception, and influenceability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 15, 87-93. Zimbardo. P.G., Snyder, M., Thomas, J., Gold, A., & Gurwitz,S. (1970). Modifying the impact of persuasive communications with external distraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 669-680.
Description:	博士國立政治大學教育學系
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCV7532012
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Education] Theses

Files in This Item:

File	Description	Size	Format
index.html		0Kb	HTML2	399	View/Open
index.html		0Kb	HTML2	465	View/Open

All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

社群 sharing

著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement

1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.

DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004 MIT & Hewlett-Packard / Enhanced by NTU Library IR team Copyright © - Feedback