English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113303/144284 (79%)
Visitors : 50808341      Online Users : 737
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/96271
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96271


    Title: 我國上市公司股權集中度,薪酬設計與公司經營績效關係之研究
    A Study on the Relationship Among Top Executive Compensation Scheme, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance for Listed Companies in Taiwan
    Authors: 吳政穎
    Wu, Cheng-Ying
    Contributors: 陳隆麒
    張春雄

    Chneg, Long-Chie
    Chang, Chun-Shyong

    吳政穎
    Wu, Cheng-Ying
    Keywords: 代理問題
    股權結構
    高階主管薪酬計畫
    經營績效
    Agency
    Ownership structure
    Top executive compensation scheme
    Firm performance
    Date: 1999
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 18:52:45 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 高階主管薪酬計畫與股權結構是解決公司代理問題的重要機制,代理理論提出以績效決定酬勞的制度,可提供高階主管努力誘因,促使股東與高階主管之間的目標一致;同時股權結構也會影響高階主管的努力,進而對公司的。故本研究旨在探討我國上市公司股權集中度、酬勞計畫與公司經營績效之關係,並利用模式推導相關的命題與假說。
    In agency theory, executive compensation contracts and ownership structures provide primary mechanisms for solving agency problems. Top executive compensation linked to performance can align the incentives of firms`` top executive with firms``stockholder. Ownership structure can influce the effort of the top executive. The main purpose of this study is to examine the relationship among top executive compensation scheme, ownership structure and firm performance for listed companies in Taiwan, and use modelling to develop related propositions and hypotheses.
    Reference: 一、中文部份
    王春源,個體經濟學分析,台北:自印,民85。
    台灣證券交易所編印,上市證券概況,台北:自印,民88。
    成嘉玲、魏江霖、秦瑞生等譯,計量經濟理論,台北:幼獅,民77。
    江毓潔,從代理理論的觀點探討股權結構與公司多角化的關係,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民87。
    周行一、陳錦村、陳坤宏,家族企業聯屬持股與公司價值之研究,中國財務學刊,第4卷,民國85:115-139。
    林燈煤,股權結構、投資與公司價值之關係-以台灣上市公司為例,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,民88。
    林穎芬,民營企業最高主管報償與公司績效之研究,國立中山大學企研所碩士論文,民78。
    林穎芬,台灣上市公司控管機制之研究-探討家族與非家族企業高階主管薪酬與離職的控管效果,國立中山大學企研所博士論文,民88。
    侍台誠,董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究─兼論法人董事的影響,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文,民83。
    邱毅、張訓華,股權結構、董事會組成與企業財務績效,台北市銀月刊,第22卷,民80:11-32。
    辜秋屏,高階主管酬勞與公司經營績效之實證研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文,民86。
    俞海琴、周本鄂,台灣地區上市公司董監事、關係人持股比例和公司托賓Q關係之研究,管理評論,第13卷,第1期,民83。
    黃英陶,代理問題對資本結構影響之研究,國立成功大學工業管理研究所碩士論文,民76。
    陳隆麒,現代財務管理:理論與應用,台北:華泰書局,民81。
    陳隆麒,當代財務管理,台北:華泰書局,民88。
    張明峰,股權結構對公司績效影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民80。
    張峻萍,公司監理與經營績效之關係,國立台灣大學會計研究所碩士論文,民87。
    張訓華,股權結構、董事會組成與企業財務績效,東吳大學管理研究所碩士論文,民80。
    黃旭輝,公司成長機會對經理人持股報償與董事監察人組成影響之研究,國立政治大學企研所博士論文,民86。
    楊俊中,股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究,國立台灣大學會計學研究所碩士論文,民國87年6月。
    楊蕉霙,股權結構與公司價值間關係之研究,國立中山大學企研所碩士論文,民78。
    楊淑華,代理理論觀點探究上市公司股權集中度與經營績效及市場評價的關係,淡江大學金融所碩士論文,民81。
    蔡俊杰,台灣上市公司董事會結構之研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文,民國84年4月。
    蔡揚宗,董監事持股比例與經營績關係之研究,會計論文集,台北:五南,民80。
    簡上智,家族企業上市後股權結構變動對企業經營績效影響之研究,國立成功大學企業研究所碩士論文,民國85年6月。
    詹珍禎,高階主管誘因契約之建立與管理上之應用,國立中山大學企研所碩士論文,民72。
    詹珍禎,資訊不對稱時主管認股模式之建立-極優法,管理科學學報,第3卷,民75:11-22。
    鄭為庠,高階主管薪酬計畫與薪酬決定因素之研究,國立政治大學企研所碩士論文,民81。
    謝永生,認購權證,台北:財訊出版社,民86。
    戴淵明,公司控制型態與其經營績效關係之研究-台灣地區上市公司之實證分析,國立中興大學企研所碩士論文,民75。
    蕭黎明,台灣上市公司最高主管之報償、持股比例與公司績效的關係,國立台灣大學財務金融所碩士論文,民82。
    二、英文部份
    Agarwal, N., 1981, Determinants of Executive Compensation, Industrial Relations (winter), 36-46.
    Agarwal, A. and G.N. Mandelker(1987), Managerial Incentives and Corporate Investment and Financing Decisions, Journal of Finance, Vol. 42(September), pp. 823-837.
    Altman, E., 1984, A Further Empirical Investigation of the Bankruptcy Cost Question, Journal of Finance, 1066-1089.
    Alexander., D.L., and H. Zhou, 1995, Product-Market Competiton and Executive Compensation, Journal of Economics and Business, 47, 441-456.
    Antle R., and A. Smith 1985, Measuring Executive Compensation: Methods and an Application, Journal of Accounting Research , 23(1), 296-325.
    Antle, R., and A. Smith, 1986, An Empirical Investigation of the Relative Performance Evaluation of Corporate Executives, Journal of Accounting Research, 24(1), 1-39.
    Barnea, A., R.Q. Haugen, and L. W. Senbet., 1985, Agency Problems and Financial Contracting, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
    Baker s., 1969, Executive Incomes, Profits, and Revenues: A Comment on Functional Specification, Southern Ecomomic Journal, April , pp. 379-383.
    Baumol, W. J., 1959, Business Behavior, Value, And Growth. New York: Macmillan.
    Benston, G., 1985, The Self-Serving Management Hypothesis: Some Evidence, Journal of Accounitng and Economics, April , PP.67-84.
    Berle , A. A. Jr. and G.C.Means.,1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Porperty, N.Y.: MacMillan.
    Bizjak, J.M., J.A., Brickley, and J. L. Coles, 1993, Stock-Based Incentive Compensation and Investment Behavior, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 349-372.
    Boudreaux K. J., 1973, Managerailism and Risk-Return Performance, Southern Economic Journal, Jan, 336-372.
    Cho, Myeong-Hyeon, 1998, Ownership Structure, Investment and Corporate Value: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics, 47, 103-121.
    Chow, Keown, Sarin, 1994, Ownership Structure and Firm Value: Evidence on Japanese Firms, Working Paper.
    Copeland, T. E., and J. F. Weston, 1984, Financial Theory and Corporate Policy, N.Y.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
    Core, J. E., & R. W. Holthausen, & D. F. Larcker,1999, Corporate Governance, Chief Executive Officer Compensation, and Firm Performance, Journal of Financial Economics 51(1999) 371-406
    Cosh, A., 1975, The Remuneration of Chief Executives in the United Kingdom, Economic Journal, (85), 75-94.
    Coughan, A. T. and R. M. Schmidt 1985, Executive Compensation Management Turnover and Firm Performance-An Empirical Investigation, Journal of Accounting and Economics(April),43-66.
    Cubbin, J. and G. Hall, 1983, Directors’ Remuneration in the Theory of the Firm, European Economic Review (January),333-348.
    Demsetz, Harold, 1983, The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 375-390.
    Demsetz, Harold and Kenneth Lehn, 1985, The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences, Journal of Political Economy 93, 1155-1177.
    Dodd, P., and J. B. Warner, 1983, On Corporate Governance: A Study of Proxy Contests, Journal of Financial Economics 11, 401-438.
    Dyl, E. A., 1988, Corporate Control and Management Compensation: Evidence on the Agency Problem, Managerial and Decision Economics, 9:21-25.
    Eisenberg, Theodore, Stefan Sundgren, and Martin T. Wells, 1998, Larger Board Size and Decreasing Firm Value in Small Firms, Journal of Financial Economics 48, 35-54.
    Eisenhardt , K. M., 1989, Agency Theory : An Assessment and Review , Academy of Management Review , vol.14 , pp.57-74.
    Ely, K., 1991, Interindustry Differences in the Relation Between Compensation and Firm Performance, Joural of Accounting Research, 29, (Spring),:37-58.
    Fama E. F., 1980, Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, pp.288-307.
    Fama E. F. , and M. C. Jensen, 1983, Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301-326.
    Finkelstein, S., and D.C. Hambrick, 1988, Chief Executive Compensation: A Synthesis and Reconciliation, Strategic Management Journal, 9, 543-558.
    Finkelstein, S., and D.C. Hambrick, 1989, Chief Executive Compensation: A Study of the Intersection of Markets and Political Processes, Strategic Management Journal, 10, 121-134.
    Fox, H., 1980, Top Executive Compensation, New York: The Conference Board.
    Hamman T. and E. Mavinga, 1980, Expense-Preference Behavior and Managerial Control: the Case of the Banking Firm, Bell Journal of Economics 11, 25-48.
    Healy, P.M., 1985, The Effect of Bonus Schemes on Accounting Decisions, Journal of Accounting and Economics (April), 85-107.
    Hermalin, B.E., and M.S. Weisbach, 1991, The Effects of Board Composition and Direct Incentive on Firm Performance, Financial Management (winter), 10, 101-112.
    Hirschey, M. & G. Werden, 1979, Managerial Incentives in the Financial Sector, Economic Letters, 2, 269-274.
    Holmstrom B., 1979, Moral Hazard and Observability, Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 74-91.
    Holmstrom B., 1989, Agency Costs and Innovation, Journal of Behavior and Organization., 305-327.
    Jensen, Michael C., 1983, The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems, Journal of Finance 48, 831-880.
    Jensen, M.C., and W.H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Cost and Ownership Structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
    Jensen, M.C., and K.J. Murphy, 1990, Performance Pay and Top Management Incentives, Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 225-264.
    Jensen, Michael C. and R. Ruback, 1983, The Market for Corporate Control: the Scientific Evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 11, 5-50.
    Kerr, J. and R.A. Bettis., 1987, Boards of Directors, Top Management Compensation and Shareholder Returns, Academy of Management Journal 30,745-664.
    Lambert, R.A. and D.F. Larcker, 1987, An Analysis of the Use of Accounting and Market Measures of Performance in Executive Compensation Contracts, Journal of Accounting Research, 25, Supplement, 85-125.
    Larner, R. J., 1970, Management Control and The Large Corporation., New York: Dunellen.
    Lewellen, W., Loderer and K. Martin, 1987, Executive Compensation and Executive Incentive Problems: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 9, 287-310.
    Lewellen, W.G. and B. Huntsman, 1970, Managerial Pay and Corporate Performance, American Economic Review 60,710-720.
    Lloyd,W. P., John S. Jahera and Steven J. Goldstein, 1986, The Relation Between Returns, Ownership Structure and Market Value, Journal of Financial Research 9, 171-177.
    Manne, H. G., 1965,Mergers and the Market for Coporate Control, Journal of Political Economy, 73, 110-120.
    Masson, R. 1971, Executive Motivations , Earnings, and Consequent Equity Performance, Journal of Political Economy, November-December 1971, 1278-1292.
    Meeks, G., and Whittington G, 1975, Directors Pay, Growth and Profitability, The Journal of Industrial Economics (24),1-14.
    Mehran, H., 1995, Executive Incentive Plans, Corporate Control, and Capital Structure, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 539-560.
    Menezes, C. F., and D. L. Hanson, 1970, On The Theory of Risk Aversion, International Economic Review, 11(3), 481-487.
    Mirlees, J., 1974, Notes on Welfare Economics, Information and Uncertaintym, in Blach, Mcfadden and Wu (eds), Essay in Economics Behavior under Uncertainty, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Co.
    Morck, Randall, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, 1988, Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis, Journal of Financial Economics ,20, 293-315.
    Murphy, K. J. 1985, Corporate Performance and Managerial emuneration: An Empirical Analysisi, Jouranal of Accounting and Economics 7, 11-42.
    Niehaus, G. R.,1989, Ownership Structures and Inventory Method Choice, The Accounting Review,16(2), 269-284.
    Oviatt, B. M. 1988, Agency and Transaction Cost Perspectives on the Manager-Shareholder Relationship, Incentives for Congruent Interests, Academy of Management Review ,13(2), 214-225.
    Patton , A. and J. C. Baker , Why Won’t Directors Rock The Boat , Harvard Business Review , November - December , 1987 , 10-18.
    Pound, J., 1988, Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight, Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237-265.
    Shleifer , A. and R. W. Vishny ,1997, A Survey of Corporate Governance , Journal of Finance, 52 , 737-783.
    Sloan, R.G., 1993, Accounting Earnings and Top Executive Compensation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 16, 55-100.
    Smith, C.W. Jr., and R.L. Watts, 1992, The Investment Opportunity Set and Corporate Financing Dividend and Compensation Policies, Journal of Financial Economics, 32, 263-292.
    Sourensen, R., 1974, The Seperation of Ownership and Control and Firm Performance: An Empiraical Analysis, Southern Economic Journal. July, 145-149.
    Warner ,J., 1977, Bankruptcy Costs:Some Evidence , Journal of Finance, 239-276.
    Watts. R.C. and J. L. Zimmerman., 1978, Towards a Positive Theory of The Determination of Accounting Standard, Accounting Review(53), 112-129.
    Wong, K. A. and T. C. Yek, 1991, Shareholdings of Board of Directors and Corporate Performance: Evidence from Singapore, Pacific-Basin Capital Markets Research , 2, 211-225.
    Yermack, D., 1995, Do Corporations Award CEO Stock Options Effectively ?, Journal of Financial Economics, 39, 237-269.
    Zeckhauser, R., and Keeler, E., 1970, Another Type of Risk Aversion, Econometrica, 38(5), 661-665.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G91NCCW0442012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback