English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113311/144292 (79%)
Visitors : 50928751      Online Users : 965
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 企業管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/96228
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/96228


    Title: 多元交易關係之研究-以兩個交易關係的相互影響為例
    Authors: 王俊如
    Contributors: 司徒達賢
    于卓民

    王俊如
    Date: 2003
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 18:50:16 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   廠商與其他網絡成員的交易關係會互相影響,廠商的某一個交易關係可能對其他交易關係造成正面的影響,也可能產生負面的互斥效果。本研究的目的在於藉由對「甲乙丙三位體」間,甲的兩個dyad(即甲乙交易與甲丙交易)間相互關係的釐清,期望能進而能擴展到對廠商多元交易關係的理解。總之,本研究希望藉由回答「廠商的一個交易關係,如何影響廠商的另一個交易關係?」,以及「多元交易的相互影響及效果,是哪些相關因素造成的?」這兩個問題,來對廠商的多元交易關係進行更深入的瞭解。
      在經過文獻探討、次級資料的蒐集以及五個產業(晶圓代工、成衣銷售、自行車、營建與化工)的個案訪談後,本研究從個別個案的深入分析,以及個案間的比較,得到以下之結論。
      首先,廠商的多元交易關係可以產生一些「正效果」,這些正效包括「資源庫集」、「資源貿易」、「提升體系效率」與「競爭模仿」等,廠商可因而改善其相對談判力或體質,進一步改善其他的交易關係,或創造新的交易關係。這些正效果之間,也有彼此相互增強的現象。
      前述的正效果也可能會進一步造成負面的效果,從個案中發現,廠商的多個交易關係,可能會因利益衝突、利益無法專享或專屬陷入等效果,使甲乙交易關係反而不利於甲丙的交易關係(本研究稱之為網絡互斥效果)。而且這些互斥效果會倒回頭來降低多元交易關係的正效果,形成一種動態過程。
      甲乙間的交易內涵、乙丙間的競爭關係、甲的相對談判力與能力,以及甲乙交易時的管理機制,都會改變前述的各種效果。當甲乙交易之資源「足量程度」低時,甲可以經由與丙交易,來產生規模經濟或學習曲線的資源庫集效果;當甲乙交易資源「完整程度」低,乙丙方為互補者時,甲可以經由與丙的交易,來產生綜效及結合互補資產的資源庫集效果;當甲從與乙的交易中取得的資源具有外溢性時,甲可以用這個資源再與丙交易,因此產生資源貿易的效果。
      但當甲乙交易具有外溢性時,若甲再與丙交易,會造成乙無法專享利益,進而降低了甲丙交易的可能性;而當甲乙交易由於需要甲的專屬投資,造成甲的專屬陷入時,也會降低甲再與特定的丙交易的可能性;最後,當乙丙間為競爭者時,則有可能因為同時與甲交易,而造成乙丙之間的利益衝突,進而不利於甲再和丙交易。
      甲乙交易時雙方所採取的一些交易管理機制也會對網絡互斥效果造成減弱或增強,例如某些可以取得乙的信任的組織設計方式可以避免利益衝突或乙無法專享利益的網絡互斥效果,但相互套牢的治理結構則可能反而增強了專屬陷入的效果,使甲方不易再和丙建立交易關係。
      甲方相對談判力也會影響正效果的發生,當甲方相對談判力強時,可以運用其對乙丙方的要求,較容易達成多元交易關係的正效果,並且也可以降低網絡互斥效果對正效果的負面影響,甚至乙丙的利益衝突反而會造成競爭模仿的正效果。
      甲本身是否具備特定的能力,除了可能影響乙丙之間的競爭關係外,亦可能加強甲乙交易內涵對正效果的正面影響。亦即,當甲的特定能力愈強時,一方面可以降低乙丙之間的競爭程度,另一方面也可以使得甲乙交易內涵與正效果間的關係更為增強。
      最後,甲乙雙方的相對談判力會影響甲乙交易時所採取的管理機制,相對談判力愈強的一方,交易管理機制對其愈有利。如果因為甲的相對談判力較弱,使得乙的交易問題雖被解決,但卻對甲造成較高的交易成本或生產成本時,甲可以進一步透過與丙的交易,來解決前述的問題。
    Reference: 一、 中文部份
    工研院(民86),1997汽、機、自行車工業現況與趨勢分析,新竹:工業技術研究院機械工業研究所。
    方亮淵(民82),國際品牌授權策略之研究,台北:國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    王正芬(民88),台灣資訊電子產業版圖,台北:財訊。
    王躍生(民86),新制度主義,台北:揚智文化。
    司徒達賢(民87),為管理定位,台北:天下雜誌。
    司徒達賢(民90),策略管理新論,台北:智勝文化。
    司徒達賢、熊欣華(民90),「投機行為分析─VIP模型的原理與應用」,收錄於:策略經營論壇第一次論文發表會論文集,台北:國立政治大學企業管理學系。
    吳思華(民87),策略九說(第二版),台北:臉譜文化。
    吳思華、沈榮欽(民88),「台灣積體電路產業的形成與發展」,收錄於:蔡敦浩編,管理資本在台灣,台北:遠流。
    李國瑜(民90),知識移轉的整合模式:知識特性、吸收能力與社會資本,台北:國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    李創同譯(1997),系統、結構和經驗,上海:譯文出版社。(譯自Ervin Laszlo著,System, Structure and Experence一書。)
    邱志聖(民90),策略行銷分析,台北:智勝文化。
    金觀濤、王軍銜(民78),悲壯的衰落,台北:風雲時代出版社。
    金觀濤、唐若昕(民76),西方社會結構的演變,台北:谷風出版社。
    金觀濤、華國凡(民77),控制論和科學方法論,台北:谷風出版社。
    金觀濤、劉青峰(民77),興盛與危機,台北:谷風出版社。
    苗豐強(民86),雙贏策略:苗豐強策略聯盟的故事,台北:天下文化。
    徐聯恩(民75)譯,公司內的權力世界:行為的政治分析,台北:現代管理月刊雜誌社。(譯自Ian C. MacMillian原著。)
    張大成(民90)譯,財務管理,台北:學富文化。(譯自William R. Lasher著,Practical Financial Management一書。)
    張五常(2000),佃農理論,北京:商務印書館。(譯自Steven N. S. Cheung著,The Theory of Share Tenancy: With Special Application to Asian Agriculture and the First Phase of Taiwan Land Reform一書。)
    張苙雲(民88)編,網絡台灣:企業的人情關係與經濟理性,台北:遠流。
    張苙雲、譚康榮(民88),「形構產業網絡」,收錄於:張苙雲編,網絡台灣:企業的人情關係與經濟理性,台北:遠流。
    陳川正(民89),非營利組織的認同管理:以基督教的細胞小組模式等教會為例,台北:國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    陳介玄(民83),協力網絡與生活結構,台北:聯經出版社。
    陳介玄(民84),貨幣網絡與生活結構,台北:聯經出版社。
    陳介玄(民87),台灣產業的社會學研究,台北:聯經出版社。
    陳宗文(民89),台灣和韓國半導體產業比較研究─以社會資本觀點論,台北:國立政治大學社會學系未出版碩士論文。
    陳振祥、李吉仁(民86),「ODM的成因與策略運作--水平式產業下的策略聯盟型態」,中山管理評論,第5卷第3期,頁553-572.。
    陳時奮(民91),「國際企業的一般理論」,於國立政治大學企業管理學系演講稿。
    章英華、丁庭宇(民75),權力遊戲,台北:桂冠圖書。(譯自Theodore Caplow著,Two Against One一書)
    黃銘章(民91),影響供應商與顧客間夥伴關係因素之研究─以台灣電子資訊產業為例,台北:國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    傅殷才(1996),制度經濟學派,武漢:武漢出版社。
    楊國樞(民81),「中國人的社會取向:社會互動的觀點」,收錄於楊國樞編:中國人的心理與行為:理念及方法篇,台北:桂冠圖書。
    熊欣華(民90),組織間合作的信心管理,台北:國立政治大學企業管理學系未出版博士論文。
    鄭伯壎、任金剛、張慧芳、郭建志(民86),「台灣企業網絡中的對偶關係:關係形成與關係效能」,中華心理學刊,第39卷第1期,頁75-92。
    鄭陸霖(民88),「一個半邊陲的浮現與隱藏:國際鞋類市場網絡重組下的生產外移」,台灣社會研究季刊,第35期,頁1-46。
    賴宏誌(民90),「網絡定位策略分析─以台灣光碟產業為例」,收錄於:策略經營論壇第一次論文發表會論文集,台北:國立政治大學企業管理學系。
    二、 英文部份
    Akerlof, George A. (1970), “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” in Barney, Jay B., and William G. Ouchi (1986) (eds.), Organizational Economics, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Alchian, Armen A., and Harold Demsetz (1972), “Production, Information Costs, and Economic Organization,” American Economic Association, 62(5), 777-795.
    Allison, Graham T. (1971), Essences of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis, Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
    Amit, Raphael, and Christoph Zott (2001), “Value Creation in E-Business,” Strategic Management Journal, 22(6/7), 493-520.
    Anderson, Erin (1985), “The Salesperson as Outside Agent or Employee: A Transaction Cost Analysis,” Marketing Science, 4(3), 234-254.
    Anderson, Erin (1988), “Transaction Costs as Determinants of Opportunism in Integrated and Independent Sales Force,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 9(3), 247-264.
    Anderson, Erin, and Hubert Gatignon (1986), “Modes of Foreign Entry: A Transaction Cost Analysis and Propositions,” Journal of International Business Studies, 17(3), 1-26.
    Anderson, Erin, and Barton A. Weitz (1992), “The Use of Pledges to Build and Sustain Commitment in Distribution Channels,” Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 18-34.
    Ansoff, Igor (1965), Corporate Strategy, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
    Arrow, K. J. (1962), “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention,” in Arrow K. J. (ed.), The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
    Astley, W. Graham, and Andrew H. Van de Ven (1983), “Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 28(2), 245-273.
    Barney, Jay B., and William G. Ouchi (1986), Organizational Economics, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
    Beccerra, Manuel, and Anil K. Gupta (1999), “Trust Within the Organization: Integrating the Trust Literature with Agency Theory and Transaction Cost Economics,” Public Administration Quarterly, 23(2), 177-203.
    Borys, Bryan, and David B. Jemison (1989), “Hybrid Arrangements as Strategic Alliance: Theoretical Issues in Organizational Combinations,” Academy of Management Review, 14(2), 234-249.
    Boulding, Kenneth E. (1956), “General Systmes Theory: The Skelecton of Science,” Management Science, 197-208.
    Bradach, Jeffrey L., and Robert G. Eccles (1989), “Price, Authority, and Trust: From Ideal Types to Plural Forms,” Annual Review of Sociology, 15, 97-118.
    Brass, Daniel J., and Marlene E. Burkhardt (1992), “Centrality and Power in Organizations,” in Nohria, Nitin, and Robert G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Brass, Daniel J., Kenneth D. Butterfield, and Bruce C. Skaggs (1998), “Relationships and Unethical Behavior: A Social Network Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 14-31.
    Burt, Ronald S. (1992), Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Chandler, Alfred D. (1966), Strategy and Structure: Chapters in the History of the Industrial Enterprise, N.Y.: Doubleday.
    Chandler, Alfred D. (1990), Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism, Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
    Chen, Shih Fen (2000), “A Hostage Theory of Joint Ventures: Why Do Multinationals Choose Partial over Full Acquisitions to Enter Foreign Markets?” Working Paper.
    Chi, Tailan (1994), “Trading in Strategic Resources: Necessary Conditions, Transaction Cost Problems, and Choice of Exchange Structure,” Strategic Management Journal, 15(4), 271-290.
    Chung, Seungwha, Harbir Singh, and Kyungmook Lee (2000), “Complementarity, Status Similarity, and Social Capital as Drivers of Alliance Formation,” Strategic Management Journal, 21(1), 1-22.
    Coase, Ronald H. (1937), “The Nature of the Firm,” Economica, 4(4), 386-405.
    Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal (1990), “Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128-152.
    Das, T. K., and Bing-Sheng Teng (1998), “Between Trust and Control: Developing Confidence in Partner Cooperation in Alliances,” Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491-512.
    Das, T. K., and Bing-Sheng Teng (2002), “Alliance Constellations: A Social Exchange Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, 27(3), 445-456.
    Davis, Lance E. (1972), American Economic Growth: An Economist````s History of the United States, N.Y.: Harper & Row.
    Deeds, David L., and Charles W. L. Hill (1996), “Strategic Alliances and the Rate of New Product Development: An Empirical Study of Enterpreneurial Biotechnology Firms,” Journal of Business Venturing, 11(1), 41-55.
    Dierickx, Ingemar, and Karel Cool (1989), “Asset Stock Accumulation and Sustainability of Competitive Advantage,” Management Science, 35(12), 1504-1511.
    DiMaggio, Paul J., and Walter W. Powell (1991), “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields,” American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
    Eisenhardt, Kathleen M. (1989), “Building Theories from Case Study Research,” Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
    Friedman, Milton (1970), “A Friedman Doctrine: The Social Responsibility of Business is to Increase Its Porfits,” The New York Times Magazine, September 13, 32-33.
    Duyster, Greet, Ard-Pieter de Man, and Leo Wildeman (1999), “A Network Approach to Alliance Management,” European Management Journal, 17(2), 182-187.
    Ghemawat, Pankaj (1998), Strategy and the Business Landscape, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
    Gomes-Casseres, Benjamin (1998), “Do You Really Have an Alliance Strategy?” Strategy and Leadership, 26(4), 6-11.
    Granovetter, Mark (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78 (May), 1360-1380.
    Granovetter, Mark (1992), “Problems of Explanation in Economic Sociology,” in Nohria, Nitin, and Robert G. Eccles (eds.), Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Griffin, Ricky W. (1999), Management (6th ed.), Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.
    Gulati, Ranjay (1995), “Does Familiarity Breed Trust? The Implication of Repeated Ties for Contractual Choice in Alliances,” Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85-112.
    Gulati, Ranjay (1998), “Alliances and Networks,” Strategic Management Journal, 19(4), 293-317.
    Gulati, Ranjay (1999), “Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation,” Strategic Management Journal, 20(5), 397-420.
    Gulati, Ranjay, and Harbir Singh (1998), “The Architecture of Cooperation: Managing Coordination Costs and Appropriation Concerns in Strategic Alliance,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(4), 781-814.
    Halinen, Aino, Asta Salmi and Virpi Havila (1999), “From Dyadic Change ot Changing Business Networks: An Analytical Framework,” Journal of Management Studies, 36(6), 779-794.
    Heide, Jan B., and George John (1988), “The Role of Dependence Balancing in Safeguarding Transaction-Specific Assets in Conventional Channels,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (1), 20-35.
    Hennart, Jean-Francois (1988), “A Transaction Costs Theory of Equity Joint Ventures,” Strategic Management Journal, 9(4), 361-374.
    Hennart, Jean-Francois (1991), “Control in Multinational Firms: The Role of Price and Hierarchy,” Management International Review, 31 (Special Issue), 71-96.
    Hennart, Jean-Francois (1993),” Explaining the Swollen Middle: Why Most Transactions Are a Mix of ‘Market’ and ‘Hierarchy’,” Organization Science, 4(4), 529-547.
    Hwang, Peter, and Willem P. Burgers (1997), “The Many Faces of Multi-Firm Alliances: Lessons for Managers,” California Management Review, 39(3), 101-117.
    Hymer, Stephen H. (1976), The International Operations of National Firms: A Study of Direct Foreign Investment, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    Inkpen, Andrew C., and Paul W. Beamish (1997), “Knowledge, Bargain Power, and the Instability of International Joint Ventures,” Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 177-202.
    Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling (1976), “Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360.
    John, George, and Barton A. Weitz (1989), “Salesforce Compensation: An Empirical Investigation of Factors Related to Use of Salary Versus Incentive Compensation,” Journal of Marketing Research, 26 (1), 1-14.
    Jones, Candace, William S. Hesterly, and Stephen P. Borgatti (1997), “A General Theory of Network Governance: Exchange Conditions and Social Mechanisms,” Academy of Mangement Review, 22(4), 911-945.
    Joshi, Ashwin W., and Rodney L. Stump (1999), “The Contingent Effect of Specific Asset Investment on Joint Action in Manufacturer-Supplier Relationships: An Empirical Test of the Moderating Role of Reciprocal Asset Investment, Uncertainty, and Trust,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(3), 291-305.
    Kast, Fermont E., and James E. Rosenzweig (1972), “General Systems Theory: Applications for Organizations and Management,” Academy of Management Journal, 15(4), 447-465.
    Katz, M., and C. Shapiro (1985), “Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility,” American Economic Review, 75(3), 424-440.
    Krackhardt, David (1990), “Assessing the Political Landscape: Structure, Cognition, and Power in Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 342-369.
    Larson, Andrea (1992), “Network Dyads in Entrepreneurial Settings: A Study of the Governance of Exchange Relationships,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(1), 76-104.
    Lorenzoni, Gianni, and Andrea Lipparini (1999), “The Leveraging of Interfirm Relationships as a Distinctive Organizational Capability: A Longitudinal Study,” Strategic Management Journal, 20(4), 317-338.
    Madhavan, Ravindranath, Balaji R. Koka and John E. Prescott (1998), “Networks in Transition: How Industry Events (Re)shape Interfirm Relationships, Strategic Management Journal, 19, 439-459.
    Mintzberg, Henry (1989), Mintzberg on Management: Inside Our Strange World of Organizations, N.Y.: Free Press.
    Money, R. Bruce, Mary C. Gilly, and John L. Graham (1998), “Explorations of National Culture and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior in the Purchase of Industrial Services in the United States and Japan,” Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 76-87.
    Nahapiet, Janine, and Sumantra Ghoshal (1998), “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage,” Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266.
    Nelson, Richard R., and Sidney G. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
    Neuman, Lawrence W. (1997), Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches.(朱柔若譯,「社會研究方法─質化與量化取向」,台北:揚智文化。)
    Niederkofler, Martin (1991), “The Evolution of Strategic Alliances: Opportunities for Managerial Influence,” Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 237-257.
    North, Douglass C. (1991), Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.
    Ouchi, William G. (1979), “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms,” Management Science, 25(9), 833-848.
    Parkhe, Arvind (1993), “Strategic Alliance Structuring: A Game Theoretic and Transaction Cost Examination of Interfirm Cooperation,” Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 794-829.
    Pfeffer, Jeffrey, and Gerald R. Salancik (1978), The External Control of Organizations, N.Y.: Harper & Row.
    Porter, Michael E. (1980), Competitive Strategy, N.Y.: Free Press.
    Powell, Walter W. (1987), “ Hybrid Organizational Arrangements: New Form or Transitional Development?” California Management Review, 30(1), 67-87.
    Powell, Walter W. (1990), “Neither Market nor Hierarchy: Network Forms of Organization,” Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295-336.
    Powell, Walter, W, Kenneth W Koput and Laurel Smith-Doerr (1996), “Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145.
    Rindfleisch, Aric, and Jan B. Heide (1997), “Transaction Cost Analysis: Past, Present, and Future Applications,” Journal of Marketing, 61(4), 30-54.
    Ring, Peter Smith, and Andrew H. Van de Ven (1992), “Structuring Cooperative Relationships Between Organizations,” Strategic Management Journal, 13(7), 483-498.
    Robins, James A. (1987), “Organizational Economics: Notes on the Use of Transaction Cost Theory in the Study of Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 68-86.
    Rowley, Tim, Dean Behrens, and David Krackhardt (2000), “Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries,” Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 369-386.
    Senge, Peter M (1990), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, N.Y.: Doubleday/Currency.
    Sohn, Jung Hoon Derick (1994), “Social Knowledge as a Control System: A Proposition and Evidence from the Japanese FDI Behavior,” Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 295-324.
    Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin (1990),Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques,Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
    Stuart, Toby E. (1998), “Network Positions and Propensities to Collaborate: An Investigation of Strategic Alliance Formation in a High-technology Industry,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 668-698.
    Teece, David J. (1980), “Economies of Scope and the Scope of the Enterprise,” in Foss, Nicolai J. (1997) (ed), Resources, Firms, and Strategies, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Teece, David J. (1981), “The Multinational Enterprise: Market Failure and Market Power Considerations,” Sloan Management Review, 22(3), 3-15.
    Teece, David J. (1986), “Transaction Costs Economics and the Multinational Enterprise─An Assessment,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 7(1), 21-45.
    Teece, David J. (1998), “Capturing Value from Knowledge Assets: The New Economy, Markets for Know-How, and Intangible Assets,” California Management Review, 40(3), 55-79.
    Thompson, J. D. (1967), Organizations in Action, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.
    Uzzi, Brian (1997), “Social Structural and Competition in Interfirm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
    Uzzi, Brian, and James J. Gillespie (2002), “Knowledge Spillover in Corporate Financing Networks: Embeddedness and the Firm’s Debt Performance,” Strategic Management Journal, 23(7), 595-618.
    Walker, Gordon, Bruce Kogut, and Weijian Shan (1997), “Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network,” Organization Science, 8(2), 109-125.
    Wernerfelt, B (1984), “A Resource-Base View of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171-180.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1975), Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications, N.Y.: The Free Press.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1979), “Transaction Cost Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations,” Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233-261.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1981), “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach,” American Journal of Sociology, 87(3), 548-577.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1983), “Credible Commitment: Using Hostages to support Exchange,” American Economic Review, 73(4), 519-540.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1985), The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting, N.Y.: The Free Press.
    Williamson, Oliver E. (1991), “Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives,” Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(2), 269-296.
    Yan, Aimin, and Barbara Gray (1994), “Bargaining Power, Management Control, and Performance in United States-China Joint Ventures: A Comparative Case Study,” Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1478-1517.
    Zaheer, Akbar, and N. Venkatraman (1995), “Relational Governance as an Interorganizational Strategy: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust in Economic Exchange,” Strategic Management Journal, 16(5), 373-392.
    Description: 博士
    國立政治大學
    企業管理學系
    86355503
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000079
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[企業管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback