English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 50998552      Online Users : 856
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95814


    Title: 歐盟治理與研究的新途徑？一個來自奧斯卡的聲音
    Other Titles: New Approaches for the EU Governance and Studies? A Voice from Oslo
    Authors: 黃榮源
    Huang, Rong-Yang
    Keywords: 歐洲聯盟;歐洲整合;歐盟治理;制度主義;制度轉化
    EU;European integration;European governance;institutionalism;institutional transformation
    Date: 2005-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 11:15:46 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 歷經半個世紀的整合，歐盟已經發展成為一個重要且獨特的政治組織。但在其憲法條約於2004年中遭到法國及荷蘭公民投票否決後，歐盟現正面臨嚴峻的民主與合法性危機。歐洲整合的下一步該怎麼走？歐洲聯盟的前景如何？整合理論研究途徑，究竟能夠為當今歐盟的發展結果提供多少解釋？這是許多歐洲政治菁英及學術研究者所共同關切的問題。挪威學者Johan P. Olsen 在此時提出他的觀點。他從制度主義的角度出發，認為歐洲政治體制的轉變，才是歐盟研究和發展應該關注的重點。Olsen 提出歐洲整合過程中的兩個難題，並檢視歐盟的「制度」是否已具備足夠能力以及如何解決其內部一致性和差異性之間的矛盾。總之，Olsen 並非全然否定「歐洲化」的努力，而是試圖讓已經失序的歐盟研究，重新尋得一些秩序。
    The EU has developed into an important and unique political organization, but with an ever more pressing problem of democracy and legitimacy since the Constitution has been rejected by the French and Dutch voters in 2004. What now for the EU? What are the prospects for an “even closer Europe”? Can the popular integrative models continually to be an adequate instruction for enlightening studies of EU governance? These questions are some of the issues being thinking among politicians and academics as well. Johan P. Olsen,Research Director of the Centre for European Studies, then provides his alternative point of view. He suggests that the evolving European polity is an exciting site for exploring the issue of political unity and diversity along European integration process. Olsen applied to two puzzles and it is asked whether there is a “European way” to manage unity and diversity and, more particularly, how institutions mediate between diversity and unity. Generally,Olsen makes an attempt to create a little more order in a disorderly field of EU research rather than rejecting the term “Europeanization” outright.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 17,159-167
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[公共行政學報 TSSCI] 期刊論文

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    17(p.159-164).pdf320KbAdobe PDF2235View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback