政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/95811
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113318/144297 (79%)
Visitors : 51002536      Online Users : 924
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
    •  Adv. Search
    Home ‧ Login ‧ Upload ‧ Help ‧ About ‧ Administer Goto mobile version


    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95811


    Title: 從保訓會受理之保障事件研析我國公務員降調制度
    Other Titles: Researching the Public Officials’ Job Demotion System in the Republic of China by Analyzing Cases Reviewed by the Civil Service Protection and Training Commission
    Authors: 趙達瑜
    Chao, Dar-Yu
    Keywords: 申訴;復審;公務人員保障法;降調;高資低用
    Civil service;Civil service protection;Civil Service Protection Law;Job demotion;Appeal
    Date: 2005-12
    Issue Date: 2016-05-10 11:15:06 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 晚近，世界各國在人事行政的發展史上，公務員制度均逐步走向功績制及永業制，公務員之身分及基於身分之請求權均予保障，非依法定原因，非經法定程序，不得剝奪，就理論與法制的發展而言，這已是吾人能共同接受的發展趨勢，惟實務上，有關公務人員之降調仍非罕見，且時有所聞，因此，引發筆者的研究興趣，欲探究在功績制與永業制的指導原則下，實務上職務調動時，尤其是降調案，我國公務員享有的法制保障為何？筆者認為在今後政黨輪替日益頻繁，且要求文官中立的呼聲愈來愈高的情況下，此問題值得探究。 詳言之，本研究欲透過保訓會有關公務員降調案之審理，佐以大法官會議解釋、行政法院之實務見解及學者的看法，解答下列問題：第一，現行公務員法令有關降調的規定為何？公務員降調案之合法要件為何？我國公務員降調法制之特色為何？第二，公務員被機關降調之原因為何？降調對公務員之不利影響為何？第三，公務員不服降調而提起救濟之原因為何？第四，行政機關主管對所屬公務員發布降調命令之法律性質為何？對被降調之公務員而言，若不服之救濟途徑為何？此類案件之救濟結果為何？保訓會審理此類案件作成撤銷與駁回決定之原因分別為何？第五，美、德等先進國家的相關做法為何？有無值得我國參採之處？ 本研究採文獻分析法及內容分析法進行資料之蒐集與分析，期能為提昇我國公務員之降調制度合法性與適當性提供改進建議。 本研究根據相關文獻資料及30件降調保障事件內容進行分析後，分為「行政作為面」與「法制面」，嘗試提出初步的建議：「行政作為面」包括：機關應加強並重視溝通工作、調職程序應符合正當法律程序之要求、保訓會與機關應善盡釐清事實真相之責；「法制面」包括：降調應遵守法律保留或授權明確性原則、合法之降調程序應儘速明確規範、德國及美國之相關做法值得參採。
    In recent years, the merit system and life-long career system have become dominant initiatives in the personnel reform of global civic service. The status and rights of public employees are all legally protected and thus can not be deprived without authorization of laws. This trend of development is now well recognized in terms of theory and practice. However, in reality public employee’s being illegally demoted still occur constantly, which inspires the author to further investigate to what extent the merit system and life-long career system can ensure job security for civic officials. By reviewing demotion judgment of Civic Service Protection and Training Commission, interpretations of justices of constitutional court, practical considerations of the administrative court, and scholarly perspectives, this research is intended to answer the following questions: (1) What are the current laws and regulations for demotion of public servants? What constitutes a legal demotion case? What are the features of the laws and regulations? (2) What are the possible causes for demotion? How demotion undermines public employees’ career? (3) What are the major causes for an appeal? (4) What is the legal essence of demotion mandates issued by administration department? How can a demoted employee appeal? What factors might affect the result of the appeal? What would be the possible reason for overturning the demotion decision? (5) What regulations do other nations have for demotion of public employees? This research adopts the literature review analysis and the content analysis methods to analyze 30 demotion cases of public employees. Based upon the research findings, suggestions are offered to balance the organizational leadership and the protection rights of public employees and also to improve the current public employees’ demotion system.
    Relation: 公共行政學報, 17,37-82
    Journal of Public Administration National Chengchi University
    Data Type: article
    Appears in Collections:[Journal of Public Administration] Journal Articles

    Files in This Item:

    File Description SizeFormat
    17(p.37-82).pdf685KbAdobe PDF21259View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏，無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用，惟仍請適度，合理使用本網站之內容，以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用，則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作，已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益，如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者，請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw)，維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback