政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/95567

政大典藏 > College of Commerce > Department of Risk Management and Insurance > Theses > Item 140.119/95567

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95567

Title:	金融海嘯期間公司治理與績效分析：台灣銀行業與壽險業探討 Corporate governance and performance analysis in financial crisis:taiwan banking and insurance company
Authors:	吳姿瑩 Wu, Tzu Ying
Contributors:	王儷玲吳姿瑩 Wu, Tzu Ying
Keywords:	公司治理銀行經營績效保險業經營績效金融海嘯 Corporate Governance Bank Performance Life Insurance Company Financial Crisis
Date:	2010
Issue Date:	2016-05-09 16:32:29 (UTC+8)
Abstract:	本文以2007 年至2008 年金融海嘯期間，台灣公開發行之銀行與壽險業為對象，研究公司治理與經營績效是否有顯著相關性，並進一步探討其與經營績效下跌程度是否有顯著相關，同時納入2004 年及2005 年檢測此現象是否僅於金融海嘯期間存在。本研究發現金融海嘯前與期間的公司治理變數顯著項目與經營績效不同，金融海嘯期間公司治理對其當年度經營績效有顯著影響，也與期間的受損程度有顯著影響，董監事報酬與經營機效呈現負相關；董事長兼任總經理呈現正相關，表示不論是在一般時期或是系統性風險下的事件發生時，金融業的公司治理機制會對企業經營表現具有攸關性。 Using data from publicly-traded Taiwan banks and life insurance companies before and during the financial crisis, this study analyze the relation between corporate governance and the performance of Taiwan banking and life insurance company. In addition, to research the relation between corporate governance and the performance change ratio of Taiwan banking and life insurance company. Obviously,performance decreases during the crisis. Furthermore, We find negative relation between performance and ownership structure and compensation of board of directors, but positive relation between performance and dual. Finally, we find there are different relations before and during the financial crisis.
Reference:	1. 吳孟紋，2008，銀行經營績效 : 公司治理、資產規模與外資進入，國立政治大學金融硏究所博士論文。 2. 吳美穎，2004，內在公司治理機制之探討 : 股東組成與股權集中度對公司治理績效之影響，輔仁大學管理硏究所碩士論文。 3. 李馨蘋、黃啟倫，2009，股權結構、關係人交易與公司績效，中華管理評論國際學報，第13 卷2 期，1-30。 4. 周本鄂，1993，台灣地區上市公司董事、關係人持股比例和公司Tobin`s Q 關係之實證研究，中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 5. 陳尚琦，2006，公司風險及公司績效之關連性研究─以我國電子業為例，銘傳大學會計研究所碩士論文。 6. 陳迪，2003，董事會、監察人特性與公司績效關聯之再探討，國立政治大學會計硏究所碩士論文。 7. 張明峰，1991，「股權結構對公司績效影響之研究」，國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。 8. 劉連煜，2003，健全獨立董監事與公司治理之法制研究-公司自治、外部監控與政府規制之交錯，月旦法學雜誌，第94 期，135-136。 9. Brick, I., Palmon, O., Wald, J., 2002. CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: evidence of cronyism. Working Paper. Rutgers University, New Brunswick. 10. Bacon, J., 1973, Corporate directorship practices: membership and committees of the board, New York: The Conference Board. 11. Baek, J.S., Kang, J.K., Park, K.S., 2004,Corporate governance and firm value: evidence from the Korean financial crisis, Journal of Financial Economics 71, 265-313 12. Bhagat, S. and Black, B.S., 1996, Do independent directors matter? working paper. center for law and economic studies, Columbia University, New York, NY. 13. Cornett, M.M., McNutt, .J.J., Tehranian, H., 2010,The financial crisis, internal corporate governance, and the performance of publicly-traded U.S. bank holding companies, Working paper 14. Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57, 2741-2771. 15. Donaldson, L., Davis, J. H. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16, 49-64. 16. Donaldson, L., Davis, J. H. 1994. Boards and company performance-research challenges the conventional wisdom. Corporate Governance: An International Review 2, 151-160. 17. Fama, E.F., 1980, Agency problems and the theory of the firm, Journal of Political Economy 88, 288-307. 18. Fama, E.F. and Jensen, M.C., 1983, Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Low and Economics 26, 301-326. 19. Haldane, A.G.,2009, Rethinking the financial network, Bank of England 20. Hill, C. W. L., & Snell, S. A. 1989. Effects of ownership structure and control on corporate productivity. Academy of Management Journal 32, 25-46. 21. Jensen, M.C., 1993, The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems, The Journal of Finance 48, 831-880. 22. Jensen, M.C., Meckling, W. H. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior,agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360. 23. Jensen, M.C. and Ruback, R.S., 1983, The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 11，5-50. 24. Lemmon, M.L., Lins, K.V., 2003, Ownership structure, corporate governance, and firm value: evidence from the east Asian financial crisis, Journal of Finance 4, 1445-1468 25. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., 1999, Corporate ownership around the world, Journal of Finance 54, 471-518. 26. Martin, J.D.,2009, A primer on the role of securitization in the credit market crisis of 2007, Baylor University. 27. Rajan, G.R., 2006, Has finance made the world riskier?, European Financial Management 12, 499-533. 28. Singh, M., Wallace N. Davidson III, 2003, Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms, Journal of Banking and Finance 27, 793-816. 29. Thomsen, S., Pedersen, T. and Kvist, H., 2006, Blockholder ownership: effects on firm value in market and control based governance systems, Journal of Corporate Finance 12, 246–269. 30. Zahra, S. A. and Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrative model. Journal of Management 15, 291-334.
Description:	碩士國立政治大學風險管理與保險研究所 97358005
Source URI:	http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0097358005
Data Type:	thesis
Appears in Collections:	[Department of Risk Management and Insurance] Theses

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.

社群 sharing

Loading...