English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113324/144300 (79%)
Visitors : 51112890      Online Users : 896
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 會計學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/95455
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95455


    Title: 由經濟附加價值(EVA)檢視產業間價值驅動因子之差異性
    Authors: 陳夢茹
    Contributors: 鄭丁旺
    陳夢茹
    Keywords: 價值動因
    智慧資本
    經濟附加價值
    Value Drivers
    Intellectual Capital
    Economic Value Added
    Date: 2002
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 16:20:55 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   隨著土地、勞力成本提高及開發中國家之競爭,台灣的傳統產業長期低迷不振,而美國「新知識經濟」效應,引伸出智慧資本的重要性,也使得投資人資金追逐具有未來憧憬的高科技股票,導致傳統產業發展陷入瓶頸。儘管現今高科技產業當道,但平心而論,不少傳統產業也曾是過去的新興產業,並造就台灣經濟奇蹟,在經濟發展史上不容忽視。職此,本研究以價值衡量觀點出發,以經濟附加價值(EVA)為公司價值之衡量指標,主要目的在探討傳統產業和高科技產業之價值驅動因子差異性。實證結果發現:(一)不論傳統或高科技產業,財務性價值動因皆為企業達成價值創造的主要因素。傳統產業若能提高銷貨成長率、增進營運資金使用效率、降低資金成本,皆有助創造企業價值。高科技產業如能妥善運用營運資金,亦能創造價值。資本支出在兩種產業中皆為價值創造之決定因素,然卻與預測方向不符。(二)智慧資本對傳統產業不具解釋力。高科技產業中,員工平均年齡較年輕、員工每人營收愈高,將提昇企業價值;而每名員工管理費用與預測方向不符。(三)不論傳統或高科技產業,財務性價值動因皆較智慧資本具解釋力,這可能因智慧資本指標不具代表性或與研究期間有關。但對於無形資產當道的新經濟時代,建議傳統產業可考慮將產業特性與科技結合,積極升級、轉型;高科技產業未來仍需就軟體與網路應用深耕發展,提昇科技人才素質及創新研發能力。最後,藉由發現影響企業價值的主要因素,企業應將此類攸關因素加以揭露,或以補充性報表表達,不但使企業更瞭解本身競爭優勢,協助管理當局進行價值管理與價值創造,也能幫助投資人更精確地評估企業價值。
      With the increasing costs of land and labor, also with the competitions from developing countries, traditional industries in Taiwan have depressed for a long time.「New Knowledge Economy」effects also reveal the importance of intellectual capital, making investors search for high-tech stocks; therefore, traditional industries fall into a bottleneck. The study uses EVA(Economic Value Added)as an enterprise value measure to explore the differences of value drivers between traditional and high-tech industries, finding the following results. First, financial value drivers are important variables to create value both in traditional and high-tech industries. These variables are SG(Sales Growth)、WC(Working Capital)and WACC(Weighted Average Cost of Capital)in traditional industries, and WC(Working Capital)in high-tech industries. CE(Capital Expenditure)is also a vital factor, but is opposite to hypotheses. Second, there`s a significant association between intellectual capital variables and enterprise value of high-tch industries; nevertheless, appearing no significant reaction in traditional industries. In high-tech industries, ADE(Administrative Expense per Employee)、AEA(Average Employee Age)and SPE(Sales per Employee)are all value creative drivers, but ADE is in a reverse direction. Third, financial value drivers are more associated with enterprise value than non-financial value drivers(intelligent capital variables)in both industries, probably owing to the research period or the fact that intellectual capital variables aren`t representative. However, we suggest traditional industries increase R&D expense to upgrade and high-tech industries expand to software or Internet field. Finally, the results recommend enterprises disclosure these value-creation drivers or express them in a supplementary statement.
    Reference: 一、中文部分
    汪泱若,1997,成本會計(下冊):第二十四章,自行出版。
    宋道航譯(Thomas Stewart 原著),1998,智慧資本:資訊時代的企業利基,台北:智庫文化。
    吳秀娟,2000,企業市場價值與淨值差異影響因素之研究-以我國資訊電子業為例,國立政治大學會計學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    李坤致,2001,智慧資本與價值動因對企業價值影響之研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    林大容譯(Leif Edvinsson & Michael S. Malone原著),1999,智慧資本:如何衡量資訊時代無形資產的價值,台北:麥田出版公司。
    周文賢,2001,多變量統計分析-SAS/STAT之應用,智勝文化。
    涂宏任,2000,經濟附加價值解釋科技產業經營績效能力之研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    莫菲譯(Karl Erik Sveiby原著),1999,無形資產致勝策略-微軟、網景、昇陽等成功企業新財富,台北:圓智文化。
    馬秀如,2000,資訊軟體業無形資產鑑價制度之研究,台灣證券交易所股份有限公司。
    張素鈴,1999,公司評價新趨勢-EVA(經濟附加價值)在台灣應用的可行性,國立中央大學財務管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    張耿豪,1999,經濟附加價值資訊內涵之研究-以台灣上市公司為例,國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃如惠,1999,企業價值創造活動型態、財務政策與經濟附加價值之研究,國立交通大學科技管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    黃德舜,1998,企業財務分析-企業價值的創造與評估,初版,台北:華泰書局。
    湯珮妤,2000,企業類型與研發支出、專利權成效之遞延效果研究,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    鄭丁旺,2001,會計理論之發展,中級會計學(第七版):第一章,自行出版。
    歐進士,1997,我國企業研究發展與經營績效關聯之實證研究。
    蔡湘萍,2000,銀行績效指標的選擇-EVA與會計指標孰優,國立中正大學財務金融研究所未出版碩士論文。
    蘇俊源,2001,產業間價值創造因素差異性之研究-以水泥業與軟體業為例,國立中正大學企業管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
    二、英文部分
    Bassi, L and D Mc Murrer.1997.Training investment can mean financial performance.Training and Development:40-42.
    Bell, C.R.1997.Intellectual capital.Executive Excellence:15.
    Biddle, Gray C., Robert M.Bowen, and James S.Wallace.1997.Does EVAR beat earnings?Evidence on associations with stock returns and firm values.Journal of Accounting and Economics:301-336.
    Brighan, Eugene F., Louis C. Gapenski and Michael C. Ehrhardt.1999.Financial management:Theory and practice. The Dryden Press.
    Brooking,A.,P.Board and S.Jones.1998.The predictive potential of intellectual capital.Int. J. Technology Management:115-125.
    Chauvin,K.W. and M.Hirschey.1993.Advertising, R&D expenditures and the market value of the firm.Financial Management(Winter):231-258.
    Chauvin,K.W. and M.Hirschey.1994.Goodwill, profitability and the market value of the firm.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy.
    Chen, Shimin and Dodd, James L.1997.EVA:A new panacea? Business and Economic Review(Fall):318-333.
    Fisher, Anne B.1995.Creating stockholder wealth.Fortune(December):105-116.
    FMAC(Financial and Management Accounting Committee).1998.The measurement and management of intellectual capital:An introduction.International Federation of Accountants.
    Grant James. L.1996.Foundations of EVA for investment managers. Journal of Protfolio Management(Fall):41-48.
    Hirschey, M.1982.Intangible capital aspects of advertising and R&D expenditures.Journal of Industrial Economics(June):375-389.
    Hirschey and J.J.Weygandt.1985.Amortization policy for advertising and research and development expenditures.Journal of Accounting Research:326-335.
    Hirschey and R.S. Spencer.1982.Size effects in the market valuation of fundamental factors.Financial Analysis Journal.
    J. Peter Green, Andrew W.Stark and Hardy M.Thomas.1996.UK evidence on the market valuation of research and development expenditures.Journal of Business Accounting(March):196-215.
    Lehn, Kenneth. and Makhija, Anil K.1996.EVA & MVA:As performance measures and signals for strategic change.Planning Review:34-38.
    Masoulas, V.1998.Organizational requirement definition for intellectual capital.Int. J. Technology Management.
    Mayfield, John. 1997. Economic value management. Management Accounting:32-33.
    McCormack, J.L. and J.Vytheeswaran.1998.How to use EVA in the oil and gas industry.Journal of Applied Corporate Finance:109-131.
    Morin, Roger A.&Shery L.Jarrel.2001.Driving shareholder value.New York:McGraw-Hill.
    O’Byrne, Stevahen F.1996.EVA and market value.Bank of America Journal of Applied Corporation Finance:116-125.
    Osborne, A.1998.Measuring intellectual capital:The real value of company.Ohio CPA Journal(October).
    Peter Green, Andrew W.Stark and Hardy M.Thomas.1996.UK evidence on the market valuation of research and development expenditures.Journal of Business Accounting.
    Rappaport, Alfred.1986.Creating shareholder value:The new standard for business performance.New York:The Free Press.
    Ronald W. Hilton.1994.Managerial Accounting.The Mc Graw-Hill Inc.
    Roos, J., R. Roos L.Edvinsson and N.Dragonetti.1998.Intellectual capital:Navigating in the new business landscape.New York University Press.
    Smith, Gordon V. and Russell L.Parr.2000.Valuation of intellectual property and intangible assets.New York:John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
    Sougiannis, T.1994.The accounting based valuation of corporate R&D.Accounting Review(Summer):44-68.
    Stern&Joel.1993.Value and people management.Corporate Finance:35-37.
    Stewart III, G. Bennett III.1990.The quest for value:a guide for senior managers.New York:Harper Business.
    Stewart, T. A.1997.Intellectual capital: The new wealth of organizations.New York: Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group Inc.
    Sullivan, Patrick H.2000.Value-driven intellectual capital.New York:John Wiley&Sons, Inc.
    Tully, Shawn.1993.The real key to create wealth.Fortune(September):38-50.
    Ulrich, D.1998.Intellectual capital equals competence X commitment.Solan Management Review:15-26.
    Wallaces, J. S.1996.Adopting residual income based compensation plans.Evidence of Effects on Management Actions.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#A2010000285
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[會計學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback