English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113160/144130 (79%)
Visitors : 50754291      Online Users : 762
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 商學院 > 資訊管理學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/95170
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95170


    Title: 探索企業導入服務導向架構(SOA)影響因素之研究
    Factors affecting the adoption of Service Oriented Architecture in enterprises: an exploratory study
    Authors: 李盈儒
    Lee, Ying-Ju
    Contributors: 張欣綠
    李盈儒
    Lee, Ying-Ju
    Keywords: 服務導向架構(SOA)
    組織理論
    創新擴散理論
    內容分析
    Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
    Institutional theory
    Diffusion of innovations theory
    Content analysis
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 15:18:30 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: (略)
    Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) paradigm is an emerging architectural blueprint which enables flexible process-oriented application systems. While more and more enterprises plan to adopt SOA to increase reusability and flexibility of their business processes, the readiness of this technology becomes important to enterprises. However, previous SOA studies focus mainly on the technical issues but ignore the organizational or managerial issues. To fill this gap, this research aims to explore the factors of adopting SOA. Developed upon institutional theory and diffusion of innovation theory, we not only consider the technical factors with SOA adoption, but also pay attention to factors related with organizations and IT innovations. Furthermore, a content analysis of online Webs, blogs, and forums is taken to verify our research framework, and research findings indicate the relative advantage of SOA, compatibility of SOA, the characteristics of decision makers, culture, IT capability, and SOA socioeconomic characteristics are the most important drivers for SOA adoption. The contribution is summarized in two folds: (1) enterprises can use this framework as a reference to diagnose their organization conditions and then make a decision to adopting SOA; and (2) researchers can develop their study upon the constructs of this framework.
    Reference: Barton, P., & Peters, D. (1992). The ASB Bank: an IT case study in sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 1(3), 165-170.
    Berg, B. (1998). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences: Allyn & Bacon.
    Bharadwaj, A. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 169-196.
    Bieberstein, N., Bose, S., Walker, L., & Lynch, A. (2005). Impact of service-oriented architecture on enterprise systems, organizational structures, and individuals. IBM Systems Journal, 44(4), 691-708.
    Brenner, M., & Unmehopa, M. (2007). Service-oriented architecture and Web services penetration in next-generation networks. Bell Labs Technical Journal, 12(2).
    Burns, L., & Wholey, D. (1993). Adoption and abandonment of matrix management programs: Effects of organizational characteristics and interorganizational networks. Academy of Management Journal, 106-138.
    Charles J. Murray (2007). Global Teams Look to Service-Oriented Architectures.
    Cherbakov, L., Galambos, G., Harishankar, R., Kalyana, S., & Rackham, G. (2005). Impact of service orientation at the business level. IBM Systems Journal, 44(4), 653-668.
    Dacin, M., Ventresca, M., & Beal, B. (1999). The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue & directions. Journal of Management, 25(3), 317.
    Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational Innovation: A Meta-Analysis of Effects of Determinants and Moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 555-590.
    Davenport, T. (2005). The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 100-108.
    Davis, G., & Greve, H. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1-37.
    Dehning, B., & Stratopoulos, T. (2003). Determinants of a sustainable competitive advantage due to an IT-enabled strategy. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(1), 7-28.
    Dobbin, F., & Sutton, J. (1998). The Strength of a Weak State: The Rights Revolution and the Rise of Human Resources Management Divisions 1. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 441-476.
    Downs Jr, G., & Mohr, L. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 700-714.
    Edelman, L. (1992). Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law. American Journal of Sociology, 1531-1576.
    Eveland, J., & Tornatzky, L. (1990). The deployment of technology. The Processes of Technological Innovation, 117-148.
    Fichman, R. (2000). The diffusion and assimilation of information technology innovations. Framing the domains of IT management: Projecting the future through the past, 105-127.
    Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control: Harvard Univ Pr.
    Global CEO Study (2004). from http://www-1.ibm.com/services/us/index.wss/xs/bcs/a1001708
    Greening, D., & Gray, B. (1994). Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues. Academy of Management Journal, 467-498.
    Greve, H. (1998). Managerial cognition and the mimetic adoption of market positions: What you see is what you do. Strategic Management Journal, 967-988.
    Harris, H. (2001). Content analysis of secondary data: a study of courage in managerial decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 34(3), 191-208.
    Haunschild, P., & Miner, A. (1997). Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3).
    Hedin, M. (2008). A Competitive Analysis of Major Service Vendors and Their SOA Service Capabilities: Part I.
    Holsti, O. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities: Longman Higher Education.
    Hulland, J. (2004). Review: T HE Resource-Based View AND Information Systems Research: Review, Extension, AND Suggestions FOR Future Research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 107-142.
    Insch, G., Moore, J., & Murphy, L. (1997). Content analysis in leadership research: Examples, procedures, and suggestions for future use. The Leadership Quarterly, 8(1), 1-25.
    Janis, I. (1965). The problem of validating content analysis. HD Lasswell, N. Leites & cols.(Orgs.), Language of politics. Cambridge: MIT Press.[Links].
    Kendall, J., Tung, L., Chua, K., Ng, C., & Tan, S. (2001). Receptivity of Singapore`s SMEs to electronic commerce adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(3), 223-242.
    King, J., Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K., McFarlan, F., Raman, K., & Yap, C. (1994). Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation. Information Systems Research, 5(2), 139.
    Kraatz, M. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change. Academy of Management Journal, 621-643.
    Krippendorff, K. (1982). Content Analysis. Beverly Hills. Cal., Sage Publications.
    Lakhanpal, B. (1994). Assessing the factors related to microcomputer usage by middle managers. International journal of information management, 14(1), 39-50.
    Lawrence, W. (1994). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches: Allyn and Bacon.
    Lee, J., & Runge, J. (2001). ADOPTION OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN SMALL BUSINESS: TESTING DRIVERS OF ADOPTION FOR ENTERPRENEURS.
    Leonard-Barton, D. (1988). Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations: Limits and Opportunities for Management Strategies. Communication Research, 15(5), 603-631.
    Lind, M., Zmud, R., & Fischer, W. (1989). Microcomputer adoption—the impact of organizational size and structure. Information and Management, 16(3), 157-162.
    Luftman, J., & McLean, E. (2004). Key issues for IT executives. MIS Quarterly Executive, 3(2), 89-104.
    McConnell, C. (2001). Author Change activist: make big things happen fast/Carmel McConnell. London]: Momentum, 2001.
    McKenney, J., Copeland, D., & Mason, R. (1995). Waves of change: business evolution through information technology: Harvard business school press.
    Meyer, A., & Goes, J. (1988). Organizational assimilation of innovations: a multilevel contextual analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 897-923.
    Mirchandani, D., & Motwani, J. (2001). Understanding small business electronic commerce adoption: an empirical analysis. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 41(3), 70-73.
    Molla, A., & Licker, P. (2005). Perceived e-readiness factors in e-commerce adoption: an empirical investigation in a developing country. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 83-110.
    Moore, G., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192-222.
    Multi-enterprise Service-Oriented architecture Increases Flexibility, Speeds Market Responsiveness (2008). from www.industryweek.com/whitepapers/Sterling_Commerce
    Mustonen-Ollila, E., & Lyytinen, K. (2003). Why organizations adopt information system process innovations: a longitudinal study using Diffusion of Innovation theory. Information Systems Journal, 13(3), 275-297.
    Nayak, N., Linehan, M., Nigam, A., Marston, D., Jeng, J., Wu, F., et al. (2007). Core business architecture for a service-oriented enterprise. IBM Systems Journal, 46(4), 723.
    Nilakanta, S., & Scamell, R. (1990). The effect of information sources and communication channels on the diffusion of innovation in a data base development environment. Management Science, 24-40.
    Pemberton, J., Stonehouse, G., & Barber, C. (2001). Competing with CRS-generated information in the airline industry. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(1), 59-76.
    Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2005). IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 747-776.
    Porac, J., Wade, J., & Pollock, T. (1999). Industry Categories and the Politics of the Comparable Firm in CEO Compensation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 112-115.
    Porter, M. (1998). The competitive advantage of nations: with a new introduction: Free press.
    Ramiller, N. (1994). Perceived compatibility of information technology innovations among secondary adopters: Toward a reassessment. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 11(1), 1-24.
    Ric Merrifield, J. C., Dennis Stevens (2008). The Next Revolution in Productivity. Harvard Business Review.
    Robertson, T., & Gatignon, H. (1986). Competitive effects on technology diffusion. The Journal of Marketing, 1-12.
    Rogers, E. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations: Simon and Schuster.
    Ross, J., Beath, C., Goodhue, D., & Competitiveness, D. (1996). Develop Long-Term Competitiveness Through IT Assets. Sloan Management Review, 38, 31-42.
    Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: Reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 237-263.
    Santhanam, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 125-153.
    Sarantakos, S. (1998). Social Research .(p. 38.) Melbourne: Macmillan Education Australia.
    Scott, W. (2001). Institutions and Organizations: Sage Publications (CA).
    Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction: Sage Pubns.
    Tallon, P. (2008). Inside the adaptive enterprise: an information technology capabilities perspective on business process agility. Information Technology and Management, 9(1), 21-36.
    Thong, J. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of management information systems, 15(4), 187-214.
    Tomatzky, L., & Fleischer, M. (1990). The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington, Mass: Lexington Books.
    Tornatzky, L., & Klein, K. (1982). Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings. IEEE Transactions on engineering management, 29(1), 28-45.
    Weber, R. (1990). Basic Content Analysis, 2d ed. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences series, no. 49: Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
    Wetphal, J., & Zajac, E. (1994). Substance and symbolism in CEO`s long-term incentive plans. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(3).
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    資訊管理學系
    96356035
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096356035
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[資訊管理學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2139View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback