政大機構典藏-National Chengchi University Institutional Repository(NCCUR):Item 140.119/95092
English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113478/144464 (79%)
Visitors : 51489963      Online Users : 906
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95092


    Title: 董事會動機與能力、策略資源投入及經營績效關聯性之探討
    Authors: 林侑正
    Lin, Yu Cheng
    Contributors: 林宛瑩
    林侑正
    Lin, Yu Cheng
    Keywords: 董事會動機與能力
    策略資源投入
    競爭策略
    經營績效
    board motivation and capability
    strategic resource input
    competitive strategy
    operating performance
    Date: 2009
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 15:07:13 (UTC+8)
    Abstract: 企業之競爭策略,對於其生存與發展具有舉足輕重的影響力,而董事會依法對策略負有監督與協助制定之責,以提升企業績效,極大化股東財富。各理論學派也均同意董事會在策略制定上具有重要影響力。故本研究參考Baysinger and Robert (1990)及Pearce and Zahra (1992)等學者的理論架構,納入策略資源投入(衡量企業策略),並依He and Mahoney (2006)之建議,將董事會特性劃分為董事會動機與能力兩部份,探討董事會動機與能力、策略資源投入及經營績效之關聯性。
    本研究之主要研究結論包括:
    1.董事會動機和能力與研發策略資源投入有顯著關聯性,但對其餘三種策略資
    源投入(降低成本、行銷、品牌)無顯著影響。而Pearce and Zahra
    (1992)認為策略會影響董事會組成之看法,本研究實證結果並不支持。
    2.董事之參與程度越高,企業之經營績效越好,而監察人之參與程度則與經營
    績效無顯著之關聯性。
    3.納入策略資源投入變數後,董事會動機與能力變數仍維持與企業績效呈顯著
    相關,而整體模型解釋力提升。
    4.董監持股與經理人持股對所有策略資源投入與經營績效關聯性有顯著影響,
    而機構投資人持股、董事會規模、董事會專業性與董事會參與程度則對部份
    策略資源投入與經營績效關聯性有顯著影響。
    A company’s competitive strategy plays a crucial role in its sustainable development. In order to escalate the performance of the company and maximize the wealth of the shareholders, the board should oversee in the process of formulating a strategy and assist when the strategy is under its way. All corporate governance theorists agree that the board has important influence on strategy planning. Adopting the framework of Baysinger and Robert (1990), and Pearce and Zahra (1992), this study takes “strategic resource input”(measuring corporate strategy) into another consideration. This research also divides the board characteristics into board motivation and capability according to the advices of He and Mahoney (2006). The present study aims to investigate the relationship among board motivation and capability, strategic resource input and operating performance.
    Several conclusions can be summarized as follows:
    First, the board motivation and capability is significantly related to R&D strategic resource input while the other three strategic resource input(cost-down, sale, patent) plays little role in this study. In addition, the empirical results don’t support what Pearce and Zahra (1992) claim that strategy will affect the board’s composition.
    Next, the results indicate that better operating performance is associated with higher participation figure of the directors but not the inspectors.
    Next, incorporating strategic resource input into the study enhances the explanatory power of the model whereas the effect of board motivation and capability on operating performance remains the same .
    Finally, the present study suggests that stock holdings of the board and the manager seem to have significant effect on the relationship of strategic resource input and operating performance. In addition, other factors, such as the board scale, professionalism and participation figure, have partial effect on the relationship between strategic resource input and operating performance.
    Reference: 大前研一,1984,策略家的智慧,台北:長河出版社。
    司徒達賢,1995,策略管理,台北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
    朱志彬,1991,公司控制型態對財務結構及經營績效之影響,私立淡江大學管理科學系未出版之碩士論文。
    吳思華,1996,策略九說,台北:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。
    吳昆皇,1995,上市公司董事會組成與特性對企業經營績效之關聯性研究,國立台灣大學商學系未出版碩士論文。
    吳建頤,1999,董事會規模對公司價值的影響,國立中正大學財務金融學系未出版之碩士論文。
    呂坤穎,2003,機構投資人對公司經理人進行盈餘管理行為之影響,中正大學財務金融學系未出版之碩士論文。
    李詩將,2000,台灣上市公司所有權結構、資本結構與公司績效間相關性研究,國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運系未出版之碩士論文。
    沈立平,2003,台灣上市公司股權結構、財務決策與公司價值之關聯性研究,國立中正大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    侍台誠,1994,董事會特性中家族因素與經營績效之實證研究-兼論法人董事的影響,台灣大學會計學系未出版之碩士論文。
    周真貞,1998,董事長與總經理的傳承對企業經營績效之影響,國立中山大學企業管理學系未出版碩士論文。
    林玉振、黃荃、林容竹,2002,董事會特性對經營績效、財務決策之影響研究-以台灣上市公司為例,管理與系統,第九卷,第3期,345-368。
    林瑞青、柯承恩、蔡彥卿,2003,集團企業公司績效決定因素之探討:業務聯結與公司治理觀點。
    林慧珍,2003,公司治理機制對創新、多角化策略及其績效之影響-研發密集產業之實證,國立中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    邱慧吟,1994,我國上市公司董事會特性與董事非常規市場行為之研究,國立台灣大學會計學系未出版之碩士論文。
    洪士庭,2007,公司治理特性、經營策略與績效關係之研究,國立政治大學會計學系碩士論文。
    苗祺輝,1993,台灣上市公司所有權結構與績效關係之實證研究,輔仁大學管理學系碩士論文。
    孫秀蘭,1996,董事會制度與企業經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學財務金融學系未出版之碩士論文。
    翁銘鴻,1998,我國上市公司董事會特徵與經營績效之關聯性研究,國立政治大學會計學系未出版碩士論文。
    陳金鈴,1996,台灣上市公司股權結構之分析,國立成功大學會計學系未出版之碩士論文。
    許士軍,1980,管理學,台北:東華書局。
    許崇源、朱全斌,2006,獨立董事及外部董事功能之研究,2006會計理論與實務研討會。
    許智超,2004,公司治理與經營績效、企業價值之關聯性研究,國立台北大學企業管理系未出版之碩士論文。
    黃小玉,2004,公司治理與公司績效關係之研究-以台灣上市電子工業為例,興國學報。
    黃鈺光,1993,我國上市公司董事會特性與經營績效之研究,國立台灣大學會計學系未出版之碩士論文。
    張雅琳,2004,我國企業獨立董事機制與經營績效之關聯性研究,私立大葉大學會計資訊學系碩士論文。
    張秀玉,2003,股權結構對盈餘資訊內涵之影響,私立中原大學會計系碩士論文。
    張明峰,1991,股權結構對公司績效影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
    張詩玫,1998,董事會特性與公司經營績效關聯性之探討,國立台灣大學財務金融學系碩士論文。
    莊宗憲,2005,公司治理機制與公司經營績效之實證研究,私立銘傳大學會計學系未出版之碩士論文。
    曾雅鳳,2001,臺灣公司董事監察人結構與經營績效之探討,私立義守大學管理科學系碩士論文。
    曾智揚,2002,董事會特性、經營策略與經營績效關係之研究-以台灣上市電子公司為例,國立台灣大學會計學系碩士論文。
    楊俊中,1998,股權結構與經營績效相關性之研究,國立台灣大學會計學系未出版之碩士論文。
    楊淑華,1992,從代理理論觀點探究上市公司股權集中度與經營績效及市場評價的關係,私立淡江大學金融學系未出版之碩士論文。
    廖秀梅,2004,董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-探討台灣家族控制企業因素的影響,國立台北大學會計學系未出版博士論文。
    廖秀梅、本建然、吳祥華,2006,董事會結構特性與公司績效關係之研究-兼論台灣家族控制企業因素的影響,東吳經濟商學學報,第54期: 117-160。
    葉銀華、邱顯比,1996,資本結構、股權結構與公司價值關聯性之實證研究:代理成本理論,臺大管理論叢,第7期:57-90。
    葉銀華、李存修、柯承恩,2002,公司治理與評等系統,台北:商智文化出版社。
    鄭桂蕙,2005,庫藏股買回對股利發放之影響,會計評論,第四十一期:78-101。
    謝淑娟,1994,以權益代理問題的觀點探討股權結構變動與企業經營績效之關係,國立交通大學管理科學系未出版之碩士論文。
    謝銘雲,2003,台灣印刷電路板產業之競爭策略,國立台灣大學管理學院知識管理學組碩士論文。
    Aaker, D. A. 1998. Strategic market management. John Wiley and Sons.
    Abor, J., and N. Biekpe. 2007. Corporate governance, ownership structure and performance of SMEs in Ghana: implications for financing opportunities. Corporate Governance 7(3): 288-300.
    Agrawal, A., and G. N. Mandelker. 1990. Large shareholders and the monitoring of managers: The Case of antitakeover charter amendments. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25(2): 143-161.
    Agrawal, A., and C. R. Knoeber. 2001. Do some outside directors play a political role? The Journal of Law and Economics 44(1): 179-198.
    Andrews, K. 1980. Directors’ responsibility for corporate strategy. Harvard Business Review (November-December): 112-119.
    Andrews, K. 1981. Replaying the board’s role in formulating strategy. Harvard Business Review (May-June): 18-26.
    Andrews, K. 1981. Corporate strategy as a vital function of the board. Harvard Business Review (November-December): 174-184.
    Ansoff, H. I. 1965. Corporate strategy: An Analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.
    Au. C., S. Barnhardt, P. B. EL-Dinary, J. Robbins. 2000. The learning strategies handbook. Anne Burns.
    Bacon, J. 1973. Corporate directorship practices: membership and committees of the board. New York, NY: The Conference Board.
    Bacon, J., and J. K. Borwn. 1975. Corporate directorship practices: role, selection and legal status of the board. New York, NY: The Conference Board and the Ameerican Society of Corporate Secretaries.
    Bagwell. L. S., and J. B. Shoven. 1988. Share repurchases and acquisitions: An analysis of which firms participate. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
    Baliga, B. R., R. C. Moyer, and R. S. Rao. 1996. CEO duality and firm performance: What’s the fuss? Strategic Management Journal 17(1): 41-53.
    Balzer, W. K., M. E. Doherty, and R. O’Connor. 1989. Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin 106(3): 410-433.
    Barney, J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
    Barney, J. B., and A. M. Arikan. 2001. The resource-based view: Origins and implications. The Blackwell Handbook of Strategic Management: 124-188.
    Baysinger, B. D., and A. Zardkoohi. 1986. Technology, residual claimants and corporate control. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 2: 339-344.
    Baysinger, B. D., R.D. Kosnik, and T. A. Turk. 1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal 34(1): 205-214.
    Baysinger, B. D., and R. E. Hoskisson. 1990. The composition of boards of directors and strategic control-effect on corporate strategy. The Academy of Management Review 15(1): 72-87.
    Bazerman, M. H., and F. D. Schoorman. 1983. A Limited rationality model of interlocking directorates. The Academy of Management Review 8(1): 206-217.
    Beatty, R. P., and E. J. Zajac. 1994. Managerial incentives, monitoring, and risk bearing: A study of executive compensation, ownership, and board structure in initial public offerings. Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 313-335
    Becht, M., and A. Roell. 1999. Blockholdings in europe: An international comparison. european economic review 43: 1049-1056
    Berle, A., and G. C. Means. 1932. The modern corporation and private property. New York, NY: MacMillan.
    Bhagat, S., and B. Black. 1999. The uncertain relationship between board composition and firm performance. Business Lawyer 54: 921-963.
    Black, B. S., H. Jang, and W. Kim. 2002. Does corporate governance affect firm value? Evidence from Korea. Working Paper, Standford Law School.
    Blake, D., A. Lunde, and A. Timmermann. 1999. The hazards of mutual fund underperformance: A Cox regression analysis. Jounal of Empirical Finance 6: 121-152.
    Blue Ribbon Committee. 1999. Report and recommendations of the blue ribbon committee on improving the effectiveness of corporate audit committees. New York, New York Stock Exchange.
    Boatright, J. R. 1999. Ethics in finance. Blackwell.
    Boseman, G. 1978. Policy formulation and strategy managemant. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
    Boyd, B. K. 1994. Board control and CEO compensation. Strategic Management Journal 15: 335-344.
    Branch, B. 1974. Research and development activity and profitability: a distributed lag analysis. Journal of Political Economy 82(5): 999-1011.
    Brick, I. E., and N. K. Chidambaran. 2007. Board meetings, committee structure, and firm performance. Working paper, Rutgers University.
    Brickley, J. A., and C. M. James. 1987. The takeover market, corporate board composition, and ownership stucture: The case of banking. Journal of Law and Economics 30: 161-180.
    Brickley, J. A., J. L. Coles, and G. Jarrell. 1997. Leadership structure: separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance 3: 189-220.
    Byrne, J. 1996. The best and worst boards: Our new report card on corporate governance. Business Week(11): 82-106.
    Carpenter, M. A., and J. D. Westphal. 2001. The strategic context of external network ties: Examining the impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal 44: 639-660.
    Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure. Cambridge, Mass: M.I.T. Press.
    Charan, R. 1998. Boards at work: How corporate boards create competitive advantage. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Chatterjee, S., and J. S. Harrison. 2001. Corporate governance. In Blackwell Handbook of strategic management. edited by Hitt MA, Freeman RE, Harrison JS. Blackwell: Oxford: 543-563.
    Chauvin, K. W., and M. Hirschey. 1993. Adversising, R&D expenditures and market value of the firm. Financial Management 22: 128-140.
    Chen, M. J., K. G. Smith, and C. M. Grimm. 1992. Action characteristics as predictors of competitive responses. Management Science 38(3): 439-455.
    Child, J. 1972. Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology 6: 1-22.
    Chung, K. H., and S. W. Pruitt. 1996. Executive ownership, corporate value, and executive compensation: A unifying framework. Journal of Banking & Finance 20(7): 1135-1159.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, and L. H. P. Lang. 2000. The separation of ownership and control in East Asian Corporations. Journal of Financial Economics 58(2): 81-112.
    Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. H. P. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance 57: 2741-2771.
    Cochran, P. L., and R. A. Wood. 1984. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal 27: 42-56.
    Cochran, P. L., R. A. Wood, and T. B. Jones. 1985. The composition of boards of directors and incidence of golden parachutes. Academy of Management Journal 28: 664-671.
    Coffee, J. C. 2005. Gatekeepers: the Profession and Corporate Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    Coles, J. L., N. D. Daniel, and L. Naveen. 2006. Managerial incentives and risk-taking. Journal of Financial Economics 79: 431-468.
    Committee on Corporate Governance. 2001. Report of the corporate governance committee. Review of Corporate Governance and Regulation: 12-15.
    Conger, J. A., and R. N. Kanungo. 1998. Charismatic leadership in organizations. Lodon, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
    Conger, J. A., E. E. Lawler, and D. L. Finegold. 2001. Corporate boards. New strategies for adding value at the top. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
    Crutchley, C. E., and R. S. Hansen. 1989. A test of the agency theory of managerial ownership, corporate leverage, and corporate dividends. Financial Management 18: 36-46.
    Dahya, J., A. A. Lonie, and D. M. Power. 1996. The case for separating the roles of chairman and CEO: An analysis of stock market and accounting data. Corporate Governance 4(2): 71-77.
    Daily, C. M., and D. R. Dalton. 1993. The relationship between governance structure and corporate performance in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Business Venturing 7: 375-386.
    Daily, C. M., D. R. Dalton, and A. Cannella. 2003. Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review 28: 371-382.
    Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, A. E. Ellstrand, and J. L. Johnson. 1998. Meta-analytic reviews of board composition, leadership structure, and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal 19: 269-290.
    Dalton, D. R., and I. F. Kesner. 1985. Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of Management Journal 28(4): 749-762.
    Datta, D. K., N. Rajagopalan, and Y. Zhang. 2003. New CEO openness to change and strategic persistence: The moderating role of industry characteristics. British Journal of Management 14: 101-114.
    David, P., M. A. Hitt, and J. Gimeno. 2001. The influence of activism by institutional investors on R&D. Academy of Management Journal 44(1): 144-157.
    Davis, G. F. 1991. Agents without principles: The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 583-613.
    Davis, J. H., and L. Donaldson. 1991. Stewardship theory of agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16(1): 49-64.
    Davis, J. H., D. F. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22: 20-47.
    Demsetz, H., and B. Villalonga. 2001. Ownership structure and corporate performance. Journal of Corporate Finance 7: 209-233.
    Dess, G. G., and P. S. Davis. 1984. Poter’s (1980) Generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organizational performance. Adacemy of Management Journal 27: 467-488.
    Deutsch, Y. 2005. The impact of board composition on firms’ critical decisions: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management 31: 424-444.
    Dierickx, I., and K. Cool. 1989. Asset accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35: 1504-1511.
    Douglas, S. P., and D. K. Rhee. 1989. Examining generic competitive strategy types in U.S. and European markets. Journal of International Business Studies 437-463.
    Drucker, P. F. 1954. The practice of management. New York, NY: Harper Press.
    Eisenhardt, K. M. 1989. Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review 14: 57-74.
    El-Gazzar, S. M. 1998. Predisclosure information and institutional ownership: A cross-sectional examination of market revaluations during earnings announcement periods. The Accounting Review 73(1): 119-129.
    Fama, E. F. 1980. Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 88: 288-307.
    Fama, E. F., and M. C. Jensen. 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26(2): 301-326.
    Ferrier. W. J., M. F. Cormac., G. S. Ken, and M. G. Curtis. 2002. The impact of performance distress on aggressive competitive behavior: A reconciliation of conflicting views. Managerial and Decision Economics 23: 301-316.
    Ferrier, W. J., K. J. Smith, and C. M. Grimm. 1999. The role of competitive action in market share erosion and industry dethronement: A study of industry leaders and challengers. Academy of Management Journal 42(4): 372-388.
    Finkelstein, S., and R. A. D’Aveni. 1994. CEO duality as a double-edged sword: How boards of directors balance entrenchment avoidance and unity of command. Academy of Management Journal 37: 1079-1108.
    Foster, W. G. 1982. Board and room. Forbes 130: 219-227.
    Franks, J., and C. Mayer. 1996. Hostile takeovers and the correction of managerial failure. Journal of Financial Economics 40(1): 163-181.
    Fried, V. H., G. D. Burton, and R. D. Hisrich. 1998. Strategy and the board of directors in venture capital-backed firms. Journal of Business Venturing 13: 493-503.
    Fuerst and Kang. 2000. Corporate governance, expected operating performance, and pricing. Working paper, Yale School of Management.
    Fulghieri, P., and L. S. Hodrick. 2006. Synergies and internal agency conflicts: The double-edged sword of mergers. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy 15: 549-576.
    Geneen, H. S. 1984. Why directors can’t protect the shareholders? Fortune 17(9): 28-32.
    Glueck, W. F. 1976. Business policy: Strategy formation and management action, 2nd. New York, NY: McGraw Hill Book.
    Golden, B. R. and E. J. Zajac. 2001. When will boards influence strategy: Inclination x Power = strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 22: 1087-1111.
    Goodstein, J., K. Gautam, and W. Boeker. 1994. The effects of board size and diversity on strategic change. Strategic Management Journal 15: 241-250.
    Haleblian J., and S. Finkelstein. 1993. Top management team size, CEO dominance, and firm performance: The moderating roles of environmental turbulences and discretion. The Academy of Management Journal 36(4): 844-863.
    Hambrick, D. C. 1983. Some test of the effectiveness and function attributes of Miles and Snow’s strategy types. Academy of Management Journal 26(1): 5-26.
    Hambrick D. C., and R. A. D’Aveni. 1992. Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science 38(1): 1445-1465.
    Hamel. G., and C. K. Prahalad. 1994. Competing for the future. Massachusetts, MA. Harvard Business Press.
    Hansen, G. S., and C. W. L. Hill. 1991. Are institutional investors myopic? A time-series study of four technology-driven industries. Strategy Management Journal 12: 1-16.
    Harrison, J. R. 1987. The strategic use of corporate board committees. California Management Review (Fall): 109-126.
    Hart, O. D., and J. G. Sanford. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. The Journal of Political Economy 94(4): 691-719.
    He, J., and J. T. Mahoney. 2006. Firm capability, corporate governance, and firm competitive behavior: A multi-theoretic framework. Working paper, Illinois University.
    Helmer, H. W. 1996. A director’s role in strategy. Directors & Boards 20(3): 22-25.
    Hendry, K., and G. C. Kiel. 2004. The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organizational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review 12: 500-520.
    Henke, J. W. 1986. Involving the board of directors in strategic planning. Journal of Business Strategy 7(2): 87-95.
    Heracleous L. 2001. What is the impact of corporate governance on organizational performance? Corporate Governance 9(3): 165-173.
    Hermalin, B. E., and M. S. Weisbach. 2003. Boards of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A Survey of The Economic Literature. FRBNY Economic Policy Review.
    Herman, C. 1981. Corporate power and corporate control. Oxford: Oxford Press.
    Hill, C. W. L., and S. A. Snell. 1988. External control, corporate strategy, and firm performance in research-intensive industries. Strategic management Journal 9(6): 577-590.
    Hill, C. W. L., and T. M. Jones. 1992. Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Stud ies 29: 131-154.
    Hillman, A. J., A. Cannella, and R. L. Paetzold. 2000. The resource dependence role of corporate directors: Strategic adaption of board composition in response to enviornmental change. Journal of Management Studies 37: 235-256.
    Hillman, A. J., and T. Dalziel. 2003. Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review 28: 383-396.
    Hitt, M. A., J. S. Harrison, and D. R. Ireland. 2001. Mergers and acquisitions: A guide to value creating for stakeholders, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
    Hofer, C. W., and D. Schendel. 1978. Strategy formulation: Analytical concepts. Minnesota: St Paul.
    Holthausen, R. W., and R. E. Verrecchia. 1990. The effect of informedness and consensus on price and volume behavior. The Accounting Review 65(1): 191-208.
    Hovakimian, A., T. Opler, and S.Titman. 2001. The debt-equity choice. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 36: 1-24.
    Hull, R. M. 1999. Leverage ratio, industry norms, and stock price reaction: An empirical investigation of stock-for-debt transactions. Financial Management 28: 32-45.
    Huse, M. 2007. Boards, governance and value creation. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
    Huson, M. R., R. Parrino, and L. T. Starks. 2001. Internal monitoring mechanisms and CEO turnover: A long-term perspecitve. The Journal of Finance 56(6): 2265-2297.
    Jensen, M. C. 1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control system. Journal of Finance 148: 831-882.
    Jensen, M. C., and W. Meckling. 1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics 33: 305-360.
    Jensen, M. C., and K. J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98(2): 225-264.
    Jensen, M. C., and R. Ruback. 1983. The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 11: 5-50.
    Jensen M. C., and J. B. Warner. 1988. The distribution of power among corporate managers, shareholders, and directors. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 3-24.
    Jensen, M. C., and E. J. Zajac. 2004. Corporate elites and corporate strategy: How demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 25: 57-524.
    Johnson, B. L. 1995. Resource dependence theory: A political economy model of organizations. University of Utah.
    Johnson, R. A., and D. W. Greening. 1999. The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership Types on corporate social performance. The Academy of Management Journal 42(5): 564-576.
    Johnson, R. A., R. E. Hoskisson, and M. A. Hitt. 1993. Board of director involvement in restructuring: The effects of board versus managerial controls and characteristics. Strategic Management Journal 14: 33-50.
    Johnson, J. L., C. M. Daily, and A. E. Ellstrand. 1996. Boards of directors: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management 22: 409-438.
    Judge, W. Q., and C. P. Zeithaml. 1992. Institutional and strategic choice perspectives on board involvement in the strategic decision process. Academy of Management Journal 35: 766-794.
    Kalbers, L., T. J. Fogarty. 1993. Audit committee effectiveness: An empirical investigation of the contribution of power. Aduiting: A Journal of Practice & Theory 12(1): 24-48.
    Kennedy, P. 2008. A guide to econometrics 6th. Cambride. MA: MIT Press.
    Kerr, J., and R. A. Bettis. 1987. Boards of directors, top management compensation, and shareholder returns. The Academy of Management Journal 30(4): 645-664.
    Kesner. I. F. 1987. Directors’ stock ownership and organizational performance: an investigation of Fortune 500 Companies. Journal of Management 13(3): 499-508.
    Kesner, I. F., and R. B. Johnson. 1990. An investigation of the relationship between board composition and stockholder suits. Strategic Management Journal 11(4): 327-363.
    Kiel, G. C., and G. J. Nicholson. 2003. Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review 11: 189-207.
    Kor, Y. Y. 2006. Direct and interaction effects of top management team and board compositions on R&D investment strategies. Strategic Management Journal 27: 1081-1099.
    Kosnik, R. D. 1987. Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 163-185.
    Kosnik, R. D. 1990. Effects of board demography and directors’ incentives on corporate greenmail decisions. Academy of Management Journal 33: 129-150.
    La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 2002. Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance 57: 1147-1170.
    Lazareva, O., and T. Summanen. 2008. Emerging boards of directors: Board behavior, functions and firm performance. Working paper, Moscow University.
    Lee, P. M., and H. M. O’Nell. 2003. Ownership structures and R&D investments of U.S. and Japanese firms: Agency and stewardship perspectives. Academy of Management Journal 46(2): 212-225.
    Lee, Y. S., S. Rosenstein, and J. G. Wyatt. 1999. The value of financial outside directors on corporate boards. International Review of Economics and Finance 8(4): 421-431.
    Lenz, R. T. 1980. Environment, strategy, organization structure and performance: Patterns in one industry. Strategic Management Journal 11: 209-226.
    Lipton, M., and J. Lorsch. 1992. A modest proposal for improved corporate governance. Business Lawyer 48: 59-77.
    Lorsch, J., and E. MacIver. 1989. Pawns or potentates. The reality of america’s corporate boards. Boston: HBS Press.
    Mace, M. 1971. Directors: Myth and reality. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
    MacAvoy, P. W., and I. M. Millstein. 1999. The active board of directors and its effect on the performance of the large publicly traded corporation. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance 11(4): 8-20.
    MacMillan, I. C., D. C. Hambrick, and D. L. Day. 1982. The product portfolio and profitability-a PIMS-based analysis of industrial products businesses. Academy of Management Journal 25: 733-755.
    Makadok, R. 2003. Doing the right thing and knowing the right thing to do: Why the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 1043-1055.
    Mangel, R., and H. Singh. 1993. Ownership structue, board relationships and CEO compensation in large US corporations. Accounting and Business Research 23: 339-360.
    Mcconnell, J. J., and H. Servaes. 1990. Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. Journal of Financial Economics 27: 595-612.
    McNichols, T. J. 1977. Executive policy and strategic planning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    McNulty, T., and A. M. Pettigrew. 1999. Strategists on boards. organization studies 20: 47-74.
    Mehran, H. 1995. Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics 38(2): 163-184.
    Miles, R. E., and C. C. Snow. 1978. Organizational strategy, structure, and process. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    Miller, D. 1988. Relating Porter’s business strategies to environment and structure: Analysis and performance implications. Academy of Management Journal 31(2): 280-308.
    Millstein, I. M. 2001. The evolution of corporate governance in the United States. The forum for US-EU legal ecnomics affairs, Rome, Italy: 12-15.
    Mintzberg, H. 1983. Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall.
    Mizruchi, M. S. 1983. Who controls whom? An examination of the relation between management and boards of directors in large Amercan corporations. Academy of Management Review 8: 426-435.
    Morck, R., A. Schleifer, and R. W. Vishny. 1988. Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 293-315.
    Mosakowski, E. 1993.A resource-based perspective on the dynamic strategy-performance relationship: an empirical examination of the focus and differentiation strategies in entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Management 19: 819-839.
    Muth, M. M., and L. Donaldson. 1998. Stewardship theory and board structure: A contingency approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review 6:5-29.
    Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2004. OECD Principles of Corporate Governance. OECD, Paris.
    Parkinson, J. E. 1995. Corporate power and responsibility. London: Oxford University Press.
    Patton, A., and J. C. Baker. 1987. Why do not directors rock the boat? Harvard Business Review 65: 6-18.
    Penning, J. 1980. Interlocking directorates. Jossey-Bass: San Francisco.
    Pfeffer, J. 1972. Size and composition of corporate boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly 17: 218-228.
    Pfeffer, J. 1973. Size, Composition and the function of hospital boards of directors: The organization and its environment. Administrative Science Quarterly 18: 349-366.
    Pfeffer, J., and G. R. Salancik. 1978. The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
    Porter, M. E. 1980. Competitive strategy, techniques for analyzing industries and
    Competitors. New York, NY: Free Press.
    Porter, M. E. 1985. Competitive advantage: Creating and sustaining superior performance. New York: Free Press.
    Porter, B. A., and P. J. Gendall. 1998. Audit committees in private and public sector corporates in New Zealand: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Auditing 2(1): 49-69.
    Pound, J. 1988. Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder overshight. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 237-265.
    Pound, W. 1992. Sstate legislative careers: Twenty-five years of reform. In changing patterns in state legislative careers, edited by Gary F. Moncrief and Joel A. Thompson, Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Press.
    Prevost, A. K., R. P. Rao, and M. Hossain. 2002. Board composition in New Zealand: An agency perspective. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 29: 731-760.
    Provan, K. G. 1980. Board power and organizational effectiveness among human service agencies . The Academy of Management Journal 23(2): 221-236.
    Rajgopal, S., and M. Venkatachalam. 1998. The association between earings sensitivity measures and market determined risk exposures: The case of oil price risk for petroleum refiners. Working paper, Stanford University.
    Randoy, T., and S. Goel. 2003. Ownership structure, founder leadership, and performance in Norwegian SMEs: implications for financing entrepreneurial opportunities. Journal of Business Venturing 18(5): 619-637.
    Ravasi, D., and A. Zattoni. 2006. Exploring the political side of board involvement in strategy: A study of mixed-ownership institutions. Journal of Management Studies 48: 1672-1704.
    Ravasi, D., and A. Zattoni. 2008. Ownership structure and the strategic decision process: A comparative case study. Working paper, Bocconi University.
    Rhoades, D. L., P. L. Rechner, and C. Sundaramurthy. 2000. Board composition and financial performance: A meta-analysis of the influence of outside directors. Journal of Managerial Issues 12(1): 76-92.
    Rosenstein, S., and J. G. Wyatt. 1990. Outside directors, Bboard independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics 26(2): 175-191.
    Rumelt, R. P., D. E. Schendel, and D. J. Teece. 1994. Fundamental issues in strategy MA: Harvard Business School Press.
    Sanders, W. M., and M. A. Carpenter. 1998. Internationalization and firm governance: The roles of CEO compensation, top team composition and Board Structure. Academy of Management Journal 14: 158-178.
    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
    Schmidt, S., and M. Bauer. 2006. Strategic governance: How to assess board effectiveness in guiding strategy execution, Corporate Governance: An International Review 14: 13-23.
    Serrano, R. 1996. Salt tolerance in plants and micro-organisms: Toxicity targets and defense responses. Int. REV. Cytol 165: 1-52.
    Shortell, S. M., and E. J. Zajac. 1990. Perceptual and archival measures of miles and Snow’s strategy types: A Comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity. Academy of Management Journal 33(4): 817-832.
    Smith, M. S., F. M. Newmann, and R. A. Rutter. 1989. Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, Community, and Expectations. Sociology of Education 62(4): 221-238.
    Spence, M. 1973. Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3): 355-374.
    Stulz, R. M. 1988. Managerial control of voting rights: Financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics 20: 25-54.
    Subramanyam K. R., and J. J. Wild. 1996. Going-concern status, earnings persistence, and informativeness of earnings. Contemporary Accounting Research 13(1): 251-273.
    Sundaramurthy, C., J. M. Mahoney, and J. T. Mahoney. 1997. Board structure, antitakeover provisions, and stockholder wealth. Strategic Management Journal 18(3): 231-245.
    The Michigan Business Corporation Act of 1989.
    Treacy, M., and F. Wiersema. 1995. The discipline of market leaders-choose your customers, narrow your focus, dominate your market. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 4th printing.
    Tricker, B. 1984. Corporate governance. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Limited.
    Upton, N., E. J. Teal, and J. T. Felan. 2001. Strategic and business planning practices of fast growth family firms. Journal of Small Management 39(1): 60-72.
    Useem, M. 1982. Classwide rationality in the politics of managers and directors of large corporations in the United States and Great Britain. Administrative Science Quarterly 27: 199-227.
    Useem, M. 2003. Corporate governance is directors making decisions: Reforming the outward foundations for inside decision making. Journal of Management and Governance 7: 241-253.
    Vance, S. C. 1983. Board of directors: Structure and performance. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon Press.
    Weir, C., D. Laing, and P. J. McKnight. 2002. Internal and external governance mechanisms: Their impact on the performance of large UK public companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting 29: 579-611.
    Weisbach, M. S. 1993. Corporate governance and hostile takeover. Journal of Accounting and Economics 16: 199-208.
    Westphal, J. D. 1998. Board games: How CEOs adapt to increases in structural board independence from management. Administrative Science Quarterly 43: 511-537.
    Westphal, J. D., and J. W. Fredrickson. 2001. Who directs strategic change? Director experience, the election of new CEOs, and change in corporate strategy. Strategic Management Journal 22: 1113-1137.
    Wheelen T. L., and J. D. Hunger. 1998. Strategic management and business policy: entering 21st century global society. Addison-Wesley.
    Williams, F. P., D. E. D’Souza, and M. E. Rosenfeldt. 1995. Manufacturing strategy, business strategy, and firm performance in a mature industry. Journal of Operations Management 13: 19-33.
    Wolfson, N. 1984. The modern corporation: Free market versus regulation. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
    World Bank. 1999. Corporate governance: A framework for implementation overview. The World Bank, Washington D. C.
    Wright, P., C. D. Pringle, and M. J. Kroll. 1994. Strategic management, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
    Yawson, A. 2006. Evaluating the characteristics of corporate boards associated with layoff decisions. Corporate Governance: An International Review 14: 75-85.
    Yermack, D. 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics 40: 185-211.
    Zahra, S. A. 1990. Increasing the board’s involvement in strategy. Long Range Planning 23: 109-117
    Zahra, S. A., and J. A. Pearce. 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model. Journal of Management 15: 291-334.
    Zahra, S. A., and I. Filatotchev. 2004. Governance of the entrepreneurial threshold firm: A knowledge-based perspective. Journal of Management Studies 41: 885-897.
    Zahra, S. A., D. Neubaum, and M. Huse. 2000. Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management 26: 947-976.
    Zajac, E. J., and J. D. Westphal. 1994. The costs and benefits of managerial incentives and monitoring in large U.S. corporations. Strategic Management Journal 15: 121-142.
    Zald, M. N. 1969. The power and functions of board of directors: A theoretical synthesis. American Journal of Sociology 75: 97-111.
    Zeitlin, M. 1974. Corporate ownership and control: The large corporation and the capitalist class. The American Journal of Sociology 79(5): 1073-1119.
    Zimmer, T. W., and N. M. Scarborough. 1996. Entrepreneurship and new venture formation. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall International Inc.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    會計學系
    96353019
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096353019
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[Department of Accounting] Theses

    Files in This Item:

    There are no files associated with this item.



    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback