English  |  正體中文  |  简体中文  |  Post-Print筆數 : 27 |  Items with full text/Total items : 113648/144635 (79%)
Visitors : 51585097      Online Users : 858
RC Version 6.0 © Powered By DSPACE, MIT. Enhanced by NTU Library IR team.
Scope Tips:
  • please add "double quotation mark" for query phrases to get precise results
  • please goto advance search for comprehansive author search
  • Adv. Search
    HomeLoginUploadHelpAboutAdminister Goto mobile version
    政大機構典藏 > 傳播學院 > 廣告學系 > 學位論文 >  Item 140.119/95012
    Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/95012


    Title: 網路拍賣價格訊息、賣方評價與出價次數對於消費者競標意願影響之研究─以知覺價值為中介變項
    The influence of online auction price, seller reputation and numbers of bids on consumers` bidding intention--perception value as intervening variables
    Authors: 戴瑋
    Contributors: 賴建都
    戴瑋
    Keywords: 網路拍賣
    賣方評價
    參考價格
    出價次數
    知覺價值
    Date: 2010
    Issue Date: 2016-05-09 14:41:05 (UTC+8)
    Abstract:   國內電子商務發展蓬勃,其中又以網路拍賣平台的使用風氣最為旺盛,隨著消費者對於網路拍賣的接受度愈來愈高,網路拍賣儼然成為現代人重要的購物管道。然而,隨著網路拍賣使用人數與交易頻率的增加,網路詐騙與交易糾紛頻傳,形成消費者擔心甚至不信任網路交易的主要因素,同時也顧慮到自網路購買的商品與購買前預期的可能有所差異。由於拍賣網站上並不提供賣方的個人資料,競標者可參考的主要訊息為賣方評價,另外就是競標所出現的價格訊息及出價次數。因此僅憑藉此部份的訊息,消費者將如何提高知覺價值?並進而決定是否該參與競標?
    為探討以上的問題,本研究利用網路問卷模擬拍賣網站的方式,以實驗設計法來探討賣方評價、價格訊息及出價次數對於消費者知覺價值之影響,並再研究賣方評價對於競標意願是否造成顯著之影響。研究結果發現,賣方評價對於消費者的知覺價值及競標意願皆有顯著性的影響,然而出價次數並不影響消費者的知覺價值。此外,直接購買價如果過低也會導致消費者對於價格訊息的不信任,進而使得廠商訂價無法達到提高消費者知覺價值的功能。對於未來研究方向的建議與實務上的意涵也會在本研究中探討。
    Reference: 【中文部分】
    1. 王薇婷(2006),消費者知覺風險、網站特性與賣方特質對消費者拍賣網站競標意願影響之研究,國立東華大學,國際企業研究所碩士論文。
    2. 林育申(2003),網路二手拍賣內容、消費者知覺價值與競標意願關係之研究──賣家類型之干擾效果,輔仁大學管理學研究所未出版碩士論文。
    3. 吳萬益及林清河(2000),「企業研究方法」,華泰書局。
    4. 洪芳芷(1999),線上拍賣網站市場分析與經營策略之研究,國立台灣大學資管研究所碩士論文。
    5. 苗惠茹(2004),影響網路拍賣消費者投標意願之因素,東吳大學,資訊科學研究所碩士論文。
    6. 連文湧(2004),網路拍賣參與者之參與動機與滿意度之研究,淡江大學,管理科學研究所碩士論文。
    7. 梁安昌(1993),不同價格訊息呈現方式下參考價格對消費者行為影響之研究,國立政治大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    8. 陳佳志(2004),線上拍賣競標行為之研究:以雅虎奇摩拍賣消費性電子產品市集為例,國立東華大學,企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    9. 張重昭、周宇貞(1999),知覺品質與參考價格對消費者知覺價值與購買意願之影響,企業管理學報,第45 期,頁1-36。
    10. 張重昭、高麗文(1995),參考價格對消費者行為之影響,中山管理評論,頁80-107。
    11. 陳孟鴻(2004),網路拍賣機制之研究--以台灣E-Bay拍賣網站和台灣YAHOO奇摩拍賣網站為例,國立交通大學,管理科學學程碩士論文。
    12. 陳昶昱(2004),網路拍賣消費者滿意度與忠誠度之研究-以YAHOO!奇摩拍賣網站為例,輔仁大學,應用統計研究所碩士論文。
    13. 陳順宇(2000),「多變量統計分析」,華泰書局。
    14. 張漢伯(2000),網路拍賣與競標出價行為之研究,東吳大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
    15. 陳歷鋒(2000),網際網路拍賣機制之初探研究,國立台灣大學商學研究所碩士論文。
    16. 創市際市場研究顧問(2007),新聞稿「台灣網路拍賣穩定成長 Yahoo!奇摩拍賣獨占鼇頭」,2009年4月11日取自網址:http://www.insightxplorer.com/news/news_11_09_07.html。
    17. 創市際市場研究顧問(2009),研究報告「2009年3月創市際拍賣調查」,2009年9月1日取自網址:http://www.insightxplorer.com/specialtopic/2009_3_auction.htm。
    18. 資策會(2008),新聞稿「2008年台灣電子商務市場規模2,430億元」,2009年4月11日取自網址:http://mic.iii.org.tw/intelligence/。
    19. 廖耕億(2001),電子商務環境中網路拍賣系統之研究,國立交通大學,資訊管理研究所碩士論文。
    20. 謝昭熠(1992),拍賣制度之研究,國立中山大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。




    【英文部分】
    1. Ariely, Ockenfels and Roth, “An Experimental Analysis of Ending Rules in Internet Auctions”, The RAND Journal of Economics, 36 (4), pp. 890-907, 2005.
    2. Beam, C. and Segev. A., “Auctions on the Internet: A Field Study,” unpublished manuscript, Haas School of Business University of California, Berkeley, pp. 1-30, 1998.
    3. Bikhchandani, Hirshleifer, and Welch, “A Theory of Fads, Fashion, Custom, and Cultural Change as Informational Cascades,” Journal of Political Economy, 100 (5), pp. 992, 1992.
    4. Biswas, A. and Blair E. A., “Contextual Effects of Reference Price in Retail Advertisement, ” Journal of Marketing, 25 (11), pp. 251, 1991.
    5. Budish and Takeyama, “Buy prices in online auctions: irrationality on the internet,” Economics Letters, 27 (3), pp. 325-333, 2001.
    6. Cassady, R., “Auctions and Auctioneering,” Berkeley, University of California Press, 1967.
    7. Chang and Wildt, “Price, product information, and purchase intention: an empirical study,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22 (1), pp. 16-27, 1994.
    8. Chapman, Joseph D. and Kent B. Monroe, “The Framing Effects of Alternative Price Promotions on Buyers’ Subjective Product Evaluations,” working paper, Bell State University, 1990.
    9. Chapman, Joseph D., “The Impact of Discounts on Subjective Product Evaluations” working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1986.
    10. Della, Alber J., Kent B. Monroe and John M. McGinnis, “Consumer Perceptions of Comparative Price Advertisements,” Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (11), pp. 416-427, 1981.
    11. D. Grewal, R. Krishnan, J. Baker, N. Borin, “The effect of store name, brand name and price discounts on consumers` evaluations and purchase intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 74(3), pp. 331-352, 1998.
    12. Dholakia, U. M. and Soltysinski K., “Coveted or Overlokked? The Psychology of Bidding for Comparable Listings in Digital Auctions, ” Marketing Letters, 14 (2), pp. 277-286, 2003.
    13. Dhruv Grewal, Kent B. Monroe and R. Krishnan, “The Effects of Price-Comparison Advertising on Buyers` Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (2), pp. 46-59, 1998.
    14. Dhruv Grewal and R. Krishnan, “The Effects of Store Name, Brand Name, and Price Discounts on Consumers’ Evaluations and Purchase Intentions,” Journal of Retailing, 74 (3), pp. 331-352, 1998.
    15. Donald R. Lichtenstein and William O. Bearden, “Contextual Influences on Perceptions of Merchant-Supplied Reference Prices,” Journal of Consumer Research, 16 (1), pp. 55-66, 1989.
    16. Grewal, Dhruv, Kent B. Monroe and R. Krishnan, “The Effects of Price-comparison Advertising on Buyers’ Perceptions of Acquisition Value, Transaction Value, and Behavioral Intentions,” Journal of Marketing, 62 (4), pp. 46-59, 1998.
    17. J Bulow, M Huang and P Klemperer, “Toeholds and Takeovers,” Journal of Political Economy, 107 (3), pp. 427-454, 1999.
    18. Joel E. Urbany, William O. Bearden and Dan C. Weilbaker, “The Effect of Plausible and Exaggerated Reference Prices on Consumer Perceptions and Price Search”, Journal of Consumer Research, 15 (1), pp. 95-110, 1988.
    19. JR Lumpkin, JM Hawes and WR Darden, “Shopping patterns of the rural consumer: Exploring the relationship between shopping orientations and outshopping,” Journal of Business Research, 14 (1), pp. 63-81, 1986.
    20. Kaylanaram and Winer, “Empirical Generalizations from Reference Price Research,” Marketing Science, 14 (3), pp. 161, 1995.
    21. Kent B. Monroe and R. Krishnan, “The Effect of Price on Subjective Product Evaluations,” in Perceived Quality, J. Jacoby and J. Olson, eds. Lexington, MA Lexington Books, pp. 209-232, 1985.
    22. Kirmani and Zeithaml, “Advertising, perceived quality, and brand image”, in Brand equity and advertising: advertising`s role in building strong brands, Psychology Press, pp. 143, 1993.
    23. KR Lord, MS Lee and P Choong., “Differences in Normative and Informational Social Influence,” Advances in Consumer Research, 28 (1), pp. 280-285, 2001.
    24. Lascu, Dana-Nicoleta, and George Zinkhan, “Consumer conformity: Review and applications for marketing theory and practice,” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7 (3), pp. 1, 1999.
    25. L Ross, G Bierbrauer and S Hoffman, “The Role of Attribution Processes in Conformity and Dissent──Revisiting the Asch Situation,”American Psychologist, 31 (2), pp. 148-157, 1976.
    26. Lucking-Reiley, “Auctions on the Internet: What`s Being Auctioned, and How,” Journal of Industrial Economics, 48 (3), pp. 227-252, 1999.
    27. Malhotra, D. and Murninghan J. K., “Milked for All Their Worth: Competitive Arousal in the Chicago Cow Auctions,” Marketing Letters, 13(2), pp. 15-23, 2001.
    28. McAfee and McMillan, “Auctions with Entry,” University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1987.
    29. Mazumdar and Tridik, “Experimental Investigation of the Psychological Determinants of Buyers’ Price Awareness and a Comparative Assessment of Methodologies for Retrieving Price Information from Memory,” working paper, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1986.
    30. M Fishbein and I Ajzen, “Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior : An introduction to theory and research,” Reading, Mass. : Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, 1975.
    31. Ockenfels and Roth, “Last-Minute Bidding and the Rules for Ending Second-Price Auctions: Evidence from eBay and Amazon Auctions on the Internet”, American Economic Review, 92 (4), pp. 1093-1103, 2002.
    32. Olson, Jerry C., “Price as an Information Cue: Effects in Product Evaluation,” Consumer and Industrial Buying Behavior, pp. 267-286, 1977.
    33. Puto, “The Framing of Buying Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 14 (3), pp. 301-315, 1987.
    34. R. Dickson and G. Sawyer, “The Price Knowledge and Search of Supermarket Shoppers,” Journal of Marketing, 54 (3), pp. 42-53, 1990.
    35. Reynolds and Wooders, “Ascending bid auctions with a buy-now price”, working paper, University of Arizona, 2002.
    36. RE Burnkrant and A Cousineau, “Informational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (3), pp. 206-215, 1975.
    37. Schiffman, LG and LL Kanuk, “Consumer Behavior 7th ed.”, Prentice Hall, Inc.Schultz, Sales Promotion Management, Chicago, 2000.
    38. SE Asch, “Effects of Group Pressure Upon the Modification and Distortion of Judgments,” in Group, Leadership and Man, New York, Carnegie Press Pittsburgh, pp. 178, 1951.
    39. STAMFORD, Conn. (2008, July 24). Press Releases. “Gartner Says 17Countries to Surpass 60 Percent Broadband Penetration into the Home by 2012.” Retrieved April 21, 2009 from the Gartner website: http://www.gartner.com/it/page.jsp?id=729907.
    40. T Erdem and J Swait, “Brand Equity as a Signaling Phenomenon,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7, pp. 131-157, 1998.
    41. Thaler and Richard, “Mental Accounting and Consumer Choice,” Marketing Science, 4 (3), pp. 199-214, 1985.
    42. UM Dholakia and K Soltysinski, “Coveted or Overlooked? The Psychology of Bidding for Comparable Listings in Digital Auctions,” Marketing Letters, 12 (3), pp. 225-237, 2001.
    43. Vickrey, “Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders”, Journal of Finance, 16 (1), pp. 8-37, 1961.
    44. Ward and Clark, “Bidding Behavior in On-line Auctions: An Examination of the eBay Pokemon Card Market,” International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6 (4), pp. 139-155, 2002.
    45. Valarie A. Zeithaml, “Consume r Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence,” Journal of Marketing, 52 (7), pp. 2-22, 1988.
    Description: 碩士
    國立政治大學
    廣告學系
    96452012
    Source URI: http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0096452012
    Data Type: thesis
    Appears in Collections:[廣告學系] 學位論文

    Files in This Item:

    File SizeFormat
    index.html0KbHTML2357View/Open


    All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.


    社群 sharing

    著作權政策宣告 Copyright Announcement
    1.本網站之數位內容為國立政治大學所收錄之機構典藏,無償提供學術研究與公眾教育等公益性使用,惟仍請適度,合理使用本網站之內容,以尊重著作權人之權益。商業上之利用,則請先取得著作權人之授權。
    The digital content of this website is part of National Chengchi University Institutional Repository. It provides free access to academic research and public education for non-commercial use. Please utilize it in a proper and reasonable manner and respect the rights of copyright owners. For commercial use, please obtain authorization from the copyright owner in advance.

    2.本網站之製作,已盡力防止侵害著作權人之權益,如仍發現本網站之數位內容有侵害著作權人權益情事者,請權利人通知本網站維護人員(nccur@nccu.edu.tw),維護人員將立即採取移除該數位著作等補救措施。
    NCCU Institutional Repository is made to protect the interests of copyright owners. If you believe that any material on the website infringes copyright, please contact our staff(nccur@nccu.edu.tw). We will remove the work from the repository and investigate your claim.
    DSpace Software Copyright © 2002-2004  MIT &  Hewlett-Packard  /   Enhanced by   NTU Library IR team Copyright ©   - Feedback