Loading...
|
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.tw/handle/140.119/94741
|
| Title: | 綠色供應鏈中風險評估之研究–以國內某主機板廠商為例 |
| Authors: | 林盈君 |
| Contributors: | 林我聰
林盈君 |
| Keywords: | 綠色供應鏈
風險因子
風險評估
失效模式與效應分析
灰關聯分析 |
| Date: | 2008 |
| Issue Date: | 2016-05-09 11:45:53 (UTC+8) |
| Abstract: | 隨著工業發展而產生的環境污染問題，促成了綠色供應鏈管理的提倡，尤其歐盟公佈危害物質禁用指令 (RoHS) 和廢電機廢電子設備指令 (WEEE) 的法令，讓企業對於環境保護的責任要盡更多心力。在現有供應鏈上加入綠色的考量，對於公司而言勢必是一種新的挑戰與壓力，這中間存在著許多的不確定性，風險也變得越來越複雜，在經營的過程中不可能完全去除風險，一個不利事件的發生會使得企業在營運、績效表現、成本、品質上，造成負面影響及損失，因此對於風險更應該站在事先預防的角度來管理它。如果能適當地評估，依據風險對於公司的重要性、潛在反應及其嚴重性，得知風險控管的優先順序，才不會將資源浪費在發生機率很小、影響程度不大的風險因子上。
綠色供應鏈的實施會關係到上下游廠商，是一種整合、全面性的作業活動，從上游的採購原料、製造過程、到下游的回收動作，都必須要有綠色的考量，需要彼此互相整合才能成功實施，這當中也會產生許多的問題。由於危害物質限用指令 (RoHS) 有規定八大類的電子電機產品限制使用鎘、鉛、汞、六價鉻等物質，會影響到採購和製造階段；而廢電子電機設備指令 (WEEE) 有規定回收率和與回收再利用率，會影響到企業的回收階段。因此從不同角度出發，找出企業在綠色採購、綠色製造、回收當中，不同階段中可能衍生出的風險因子，如此才能做到完整的考量。
本研究建立整體的綠色供應鏈風險評估模式，探討企業在實施綠色供應鏈可能所衍生的風險，找出影響的風險因子，並透過失效模式與效應分析(FMEA)，加入模糊語意概念、灰關聯分析的方式，針對風險因子可能所帶來的嚴重性、發生度、難檢度進行分析評估，藉由計算出的風險值，可以排列出風險因子的風險大小，讓企業能知道控管的優先順序。
Along with the industrial development has brought the environmental pollution question. Therefore green supply chain management was promoted. European Union announces the WEEE directive (Waste Electrical & Electronic Equipment) and RoHS directive (The Restriction of the use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment). These regulations make manufactures & retailers take charge of environment protection. The green consideration will be subsumed into the supply chain. It’s a new challenge and pressure for company. Because green supply chain management implies uncertainty, the risk will be become more and more complex. The company couldn’t remove risk. The occurrence of harmful event may cause cost, quality, performance negative affection and financial failure. The company should manage risk in advance. If the company can appropriately assess risk, according to the importance, severity, occurrence of risk, the company will get the priority of risk control, we won’t waste our resources on the risk that the occurrence probability is very small and influences degree is not very great.
To implement the green supply chain will influence supplier, manufacturer, recycler and Name Brand Vendor. It’s a conformability and comprehensive activity. From supplier purchase raw material to Name Brand Vendor recycle the product, they all need a green consideration. They need the mutual conformity, so they can successfully implement the green supply chain. The RoHS has already ruled the restriction that Electrical and Electronic Equipment are limited to use Lead, Cadmium, Mercury, Hexavalent Chromium, Polybrominated Biphenyls, etc, and therefore will influence the purchase stage of business and the manufacturing stage of business. The WEEE regulation include recovery rate and recue/recycling rate, so will influence the return stage of business. We should assess risk from the different viewpoint, and find out risk factor of the purchase stage, the manufacturing stage of business, and therefore we can have a complete consideration.
This research constructs the risk assessment model for green supply chain, and probes into influential risk factors when the company implements the green supply chain. This study based on Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) that combine fuzzy set theory and grey theory, to analyze severity, occurrence, detection of risk factor. Results of this study show that risk value of risk factor, the arrangement of risk factors and the priority of risk control. |
| Reference: | 1.小野寺勝重，民90，『實踐FMEA手法』，張書文譯，台北：長榮國際股份有限公司。
2.毛穎崙，民95『綠色供應鏈電子化管理系統規劃』，工業污染防治季刊，第二十五卷．第二期：149~168頁。
3.史開泉、吳國威、黃有評，民83，灰色信息關係論，台北：全華圖書股份有限公司。
4.向殿政男，民81，Fuzzy手法進階，台北：全華圖書股份有限公司。
5.李昀育，民94，供應鏈風險評估架構發展與分析之探討，大葉大學事業經營學系碩士論文。
6.李若蘭，民95，WEEE資訊系統設計之研究，長庚大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
7.李彥仕，民95，影響現金卡違約風險之因素分析，國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
8.林士彥、黃宗成，民94『應用灰關聯分析軟體業聲望評價之研究』，管理科學研究，第二卷．第一期：17~33頁。
9.林進財、張哲維、陳啟斌，民94『量化及質化多準則決策運用於產業投資優勢評估』，管理科學研究，第二卷．第二期：29~45頁。
10.紀岱玲，民95，供應商績效評估硏究 : 結合ANP及DEMATEL之應用，國立政治大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
11.胡憲倫、許家偉、吳唯丞，民95『環境風險觀點之綠色供應鏈管理』，工業污染防治季刊，第二十五卷．第二期：103~121頁。
12.許享承，民95，綠色供應鏈管理機制建構之研究，國立中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班論文。
13.吳唯丞，民96，綠色物料風險評估架構之研究–以電子產業為例，國立臺北科技大學環境規劃與管理學系碩士論文。
14.韋俊仲、何順全、丁冰和，民94，『 SCOR 在紡織產業供應鏈應用』，第二十一屆纖維紡織科技研討會，台南女子技術學院主辦。
15.徐村和、林凌仲，民94『應用模糊理論建立旅遊風險分析矩陣』，中山管理評論，第十三卷．第二期：479~509頁。
16.夏郭賢、吳漢雄，民88『灰關聯分析之線性數據前處理探討』，灰色系統學刊，第一卷．第一期：47~53頁。
17.陳明儀、夏郭賢，民91，『定量化灰關聯度研究』，第七屆灰色系統研討會，中華民國灰色系統學會與遠東技術學院合辦。
18.陳文欽、許惠玲、蔡志弘、羅展興，民94『模糊失效模式與效應分析於企業決策之應用–以新產品開發風險為例』，機械工業雜誌，第268期:112~127頁。
19.陳嘉仁，民85，模糊邏輯失效模式、效應與關鍵性分析系統之研究，國立中央大學資訊管理學系碩士論文。
20.陳膺仁，民95，供應鏈風險衡量模式之建立，東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
21.陳文凱，民96，電子業因應歐盟化學物質管制風險管理之研究，國立臺北科技大學環境規劃與管理學系碩士論文。
22.陳璟鴻，民96，紡織業全球運籌績效指標架構，國立政治大學資訊管理系碩士論文。
23.黃聯海、陳政徽、劉文雄，民95，『綠色供應鏈管理之分析』，中華民國品質學會第42屆年會暨第12屆全國品質管理研討會。
24.張清亮，民88，製程設計的改善評估模式，中華大學工業工程與管理學系碩士論文。
25.張致莊，民95，綠色採購對供應風險影響之研究，東吳大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
26.孫宗瀛、楊英魁，民94，Fuzzy控制:理論、實作與應用，台北：全華圖書股份有限公司。
27.楊致行，民94，『電子產業之環保要求及企業的因應策略分析』，工業污染防治季刊，第二十四卷．第二期：155~180頁。
28.湯敏儷，民94，運用FMEA技術於審計風險之研究–光陽公司案例，義守大學管理學系碩士論文。
29.廖偉全，民91，營建工程風險確認分析模式–以隧道擠壓變形潛能為例，國立成功大學土木工程學系碩士論文。
30.鄭燦堂，民84，風險管理－理論與實務，台北：五南圖書出版有限公司。
31.鄧聚龍，民89，灰色系統理論與應用，台北：高立圖書有限公司。
32.謝長宏，民70，系統動態學–理論．方法與應用，台北：中興管理顧問公司。
33.AIRMIC, IRM, ALARM, A Risk Management Standard, ALARM, IRM, ALARM,2002
34.Beamon, B. M. “Measuring supply chain performance,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management (19:3) 1999, pp.275-295
35.Chang, C.L. , Tsai, C.H. and Wei, C.C. “A New Evaluation Method for Failure Mode And Effects Analysis,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Industrial Engineers (17:1) 2000,pp:51-64
36.Chen, S.J. and Hwang C.L. , Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods and Applications, Berlin, New York, 1992
37.Dangayach, G. S. and Deshmukh S. G. “Manufacturing Strategy: Experiences from Select Indian Organizations,” Journal of Manufacturing Systems, (19:2) 2000,pp:134-148
38.Fawcett, S. E. , Stanley, L. L., and Smith, S.R. “Developing a logistics Capability to Improve the Performance of International Operations,” Journal of Business Logistics (18:2)1997, pp:101-124
39.Gilchrist,W. “Modeling Failure Modes and Effects Analysis,” International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (10:5) 1993, pp:16-24
40.Handfield, R. ,Sroufe, R. and Walton, S. “Integrating Environmental Management and Supply Chain Strategies,” Business Strategy and the Envrionment (14:1) 2005, pp:1-19
41.Harland, C. , Brenchley, R. and Walker, H. “Risk in supply networks,” Journal of Purchasing & Supply management (9) 2003, pp:51-62
42.Hall, K. “Defending lead-free,” Electronics Weekly (2265) 2006, pp:16-18
43.Hervani, A. A., Helms, M. M. and Sarkis J. “Performance measurement for green supply chain management,” Benchmarking: An international Journal (12:4) 2005, pp: 330-353.
44.Jorensen, B. “IT’S TOUGH to be GREEN,” Electronic Business (32:3) 2006,pp:30-37
45.LIU, H. , Chen W. and Kang Z. “Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making for Evaluating Aggregate Risk in Green Manufacturing,” TSINGHUA SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (10:5) 2005,pp:627-632
46.Maskell, B.H. “Performance Measurement for World Class Manufacturing,” Manufacutring Systems(7:9) 1989,pp:26-41
47.Mucha, S. “EMS Challenges in an RoHS world,” Circuits Assembly(18:3) 2007,pp:16-17
48.Norrman, A. and Jansson, U. “Ericsson`s proactive supply chain risk management approach after a serious sub-supplier accident,” International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management (34:5) 2004, pp:434-456
49.Rao, P. and Holt, D. “Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic,” International Journal of Operations & Production Management (25:9) 2005, pp:898-916
50.Sheu, J.B. , Chou, Y.H. and Hu C.C. “An integrated logistics operational model for green-supply chain management,” Transportation Research Part E (41) 2005,pp:287-313
51.Sharratt, P.N. and Choong, P.M. “A life-cycle framework to analyze business risk in process industry projects,” Journal of Cleaner Production (10) 2002, pp:479-493
52.Sharma, R.K. , Kumar, D. and Kumar, P. “Systematic failure mode effect analysis(FMEA) using fuzzy linguistic modeling,” The International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management (22:9) 2005,pp:986-1004
53.Shea, D. “The Greening of Electronics,” Circuits Assembly (17:7) 2006,pp:24-26
54.Stamatis, D. H. Failure mode and effect analysis: FMEA from theory to execution. ASQC Quality Press,Wisconsin,1995
55.Teng, J. Y. and Tzeng, G. H. “Fuzzy multicriteria ranking of urban transporation investment alternative,” Transporation Planning and Technology (20:1) 1996,pp:15-31.
56.Ward, P. T., McCreery, J. K., Ritzman, L. P. and Sharma, D. “Competitive Priorities in Operations Management,” Decision Sciences (29:4) 1998,pp: 1035-1046.
57.Williams, J. “Overcoming Product Identification Challenges,” SMT (21:1) 2007, pp:44
58.Zsidisin, G.A. “Managerial perceptions of supply risk,” Journal of Supply Chain Management (39:1) 2003,pp:14-26 |
| Description: | 碩士
國立政治大學
資訊管理學系
95356004 |
| Source URI: | http://thesis.lib.nccu.edu.tw/record/#G0095356004 |
| Data Type: | thesis |
| Appears in Collections: | [資訊管理學系] 學位論文
|
Files in This Item:
| File |
Size | Format | |
|---|
| index.html | 0Kb | HTML2 | 234 | View/Open |
|
All items in 政大典藏 are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.
|
